Originally posted by counterterrorist
I have no interest in arguing or debating whether Emory, Manning, Bormann or Loftus exist. ...or, if they are important.
I am concerned making people aware that the threat of 2012 is trace-able directly to the Bank-of-England/Fed/Bundesbank/etc. interlocking corporate
directorate that funds al Qaeda and all the other para-military terrorist operatives, owns all the banks, own all the oil companies, raises food
prices, poisons food and wants to eliminate 90% of humanity -- and also funded the Nazis, Russians, Americans, British, Arabs, Israeli's Vietcong and
so forth to bring about 2012.
This is what interests me too. I have good reason to believe that Bormann is a false flag, if indeed he was a conduit I would hazard the his
'controllers' would have had him killed as soon as he turned himself in - just as they did Himmler. Therefore, I am unwilling to 'flog a dead
horse', it will get neither of us anywhere. However, I have traced all the connections to and from Himmler, with very few exceptions - this is not
to say that I do not respect your point of view of Bormann, just that I don't think it is necessary or important (to me) to pursue that angle any
further than I have - there is nothing new to be found at this stage. The point to understand is that whatever happened to Bormann, he was a cog and
not a very important one at that. Some mysteries you have to let go, simply because we only have one lifetime, and proving something one way or
another will propel you no further ahead.
Similarly there is no need to argue whether Odessa existed, the Rat Lines did. We also can trace the paths of the former SS and understand what
purpose they filled post-war. At the end of the war, Nazis were aided by the Vatican (via Alois Hundal) to escape to South America, these are very
well documented and based up on the testimony of those who used them. We also have some information regarding Skorzeny's post war activities, but
this is somewhat more shrouded.
Skorzeny was at this stage going through the trial system having been captured by US forces in May 1945, but there is was very little evidence
produced against him (again we can argue the whys and wherefores but the result is the same) and he like many others, escaped from an internment camp
in 1948. The Vatican Rat Lines had by this time dried up.
During the war, Skorzeny had led a Commando unit based upon the British model set up by Churchill, his unit after some initial failures had succeeded
in rescuing Mussolini in 1943. This placed him favourably with Hitler and Himmler promoted him to Major-General. He was used in 'Action Horthy',
the plan to kidnap the Hungarian king who was at that time (Oct 1944) engaged in talks with the Russians. Once again he was successful. The infamous
Operation Greif followed in December. He was a man who believed that the ends justified the means and was happy as long as he got paid. He was also
about as far-right as you can get.
Skorzeny opened an import and export business in 1951 in Madrid. This was a front through which he helped former members of the SS to escape Germany.
Skorzeny then formed these men into mercenary units. Via his hotel in Denia (on the mediterranean coast) he transferred these units to Africa, the
Middle-East and South America (for which he was rewarded handsomely). Additionally, he set up HIAG (Federation of German Soldiers) which not only
funded the escape of the men from Germany but also funded denialist propaganda. There are also a number of rumours that suggest he supplied
mercenaries for use by the French in Indo-China. This is more heavily concealed, for obvious reasons.
Skorzeny obviously must have had a contact list, every good mercenary runner needs high level contacts. He obviously made a vast amount of money as
he bought a number of properties both in Spain and Ireland (which may give you a hint as to his contacts). Franco though initially in business with
the Nazis soon changed sides to support Britain when the Nazis ran out of hard currency, and Churchill authorised regular and large payments to the
Spanish dictator. It can be therefore assumed that Skorzeny was in contact, via Franco, with the Churchill faction (which included Sir William
Stephenson, another mercenary runner).
Now for me, this is all the information I need. Skorzeny organised mercenaries, those mercenaries were used in illegal wars and by governments
against their own citizens. Skorzeny arranged assassinations. For all this he was rewarded. These represent any number of factions and concerns.
Again, it helps fill in the picture but we are no nearer our goal. Skorzeny was a cog, a vicious and brutal one, but like the mercenaries he ran,
trained by Theodor Eicke, they were of no use otherwise. The only skills they had, were to murder with impunity. They were protected by those who
hired them, but the employers varied.
Incidently another great book by Forsyth, The Dogs of War (please read the book if you are interested, do not settle for the film, it pales in
comparison) deals with the mercenary system and the mess that was made of Africa as a result. If you want to learn more about Skorzeny I recommend,
although I can't remember the title, Charles Whiting's book on him. He interviewed him a number of times.
I've just googled it and here is a link - great book and writer (I have read a number of his books - he actually lived a couple of streets down from
me, but I didn't, sadly, find that out until he died)
www.amazon.com...=sib_dp_pt#reader-link
I have found that time and time again on this subject, I come to a dead end. Sometimes I try to find a chink, but often I have found it most
productive to trace back my steps and try another route. You have to let some things go, because to do otherwise is to chase shadows...but that is
me, we perhaps are looking for different things.
As I said I can talk about this all day, I love the subject (as macabre as it may be to some) and it is good to find someone who shares my enthusiasm
for detail. I am happy to discuss Bormann up until 1945, but after that the trail is cold and irrelevant. He is not important enough to warrant my
time, I hope that doesn;t seem dismissive, I don't intend it to be, but like you I have my own priorities and I have been there done that already,
got no-where. There are far more interesting paths to follow, productive too. Bormann like the denialist debate only expends time and energy without
any reward or foreseeable conclusion.
[edit on 22-4-2008 by KilgoreTrout]