Vote Libertarian. Vote Constitution Party. Write in Ron Paul.
Heck .. Vote for McCain.
(I don't really like the guy, but he's better than Obama).
Vote for any of these ... but not Obama. He's worse.

Of course .. he's CFR and he's their Crown Prince ... we'll probably
be stuck with him no matter what we do.

*YAWN*

Here we go again...this is like your third (at least) anti-Obama post. I guess you are on some sort of mission. Who do you work for?

I guess Obama must be making great strides if so many are doing so much to discredit him. The PTB must just be scared to death of defeat.

Anyway, always info-tained by your posts. Comedy is always aprreciated.

Originally posted by kosmicjack
*YAWN*

Ohhh .. THAT's the problem, eh? Kosmicjack .. WAKE UP!

.this is like your third (at least) anti-Obama post.

Actually, I have opened quite a few EXPOSING-OBAMA threads.

Who do you work for?

A pre-school. Cute little kiddies. Lots of germs though.

so many are doing so much to discredit him.

Actually, Obama provides all the fodder. He's a wealth of lies,
misstatements, contradictions, corrupt business associates, and corrupt
mentors. His wife is just as helpful.

If the Obamatrons weren't so glassy-eyed and in such a zombie state, it
wouldn't be so much fun to expose the guy. Some here have posted
things such as 'obama never lies' ... 'obama is like our savior' ....

Spooky stuff.

Originally posted by Karlhungis
I would vote for Ron Paul if I thought he had even the slightest chance of winning.

I'm most likely going to vote for him. Write him in if I have to. I have to have a clear conscience. At this point, he's the only one that I can point to and say that I could sleep well at night with my vote for him.

As a non-US citizen, I'm not entirely up to scratch with your candidates but I always assumed Obama to be America's best choice at this point in time.

I guess he's not so squeeky clean afterall, but then again... can you name a politician who is?

Originally posted by Communist-Cola
I guess he's not so squeeky clean afterall,

It's a matter of finding the least worst. Right now .. the worst is Obama.
Followed closely by Hillary. McCain has his problems too, but he isn't 'the worst'. Ron Paul is probably the best of the mainstream contenders - IMHO.

I'm not saying Flyers Fan doesn't bring a lot to his/her posts...I'm am saying that we should not pretend it's for informational purposes only. When the last three posts are all about dismantling Obama, there is a definite agenda. As such, I'll read the posts with that perspective in mind.

I can disagree with the content and still acknowledge my fellow ATS member's contribution, such as it is.

Originally posted by kosmicjack
his/her posts...

Her

we should not pretend it's for informational purposes only.

You can pretend it's anything you like.
The fact is that it's for information and discussion.
At the moment Obama is providing the fodder.
You don't like it? Talk to him.

there is a definite agenda.

Oh yes .. an old lady/ preschool teacher who has an agenda and decides to set up shop on a conspiracy board ... Conspiracy-board paranoia at it's best.

So FF is posting threads that aren't pro Obama. So? How many threads are anti Bush? Don't see too many people complaining about those. And I've posted my two cents to a few anti-Hillary threads, myself.

I always thought that anyone here could have their opinion on whatever, even if it's bashing Obama.

I have a little hint I'd like pass on: Obama isn't innocent. None of them are.

Keep it up, FF.

I AM NOT THE SUBJECT OF THIS THREAD.
OBAMA's OIL COMPANY LINKS ARE.

Originally posted by Sublime620
All you ever post is "Obama this" "Obama that",

Whine, whine, whine.

but you never support a candidate

Newsflash – I DO NOT HAVE TO. If I never support a candidate … so what? If all I do is expose the candidates lies and what’s wrong with them .. so what? That’s my right. Oh .. for the record .. I HAVE stated that I’ll probably vote for Ron Paul. Probably.

or actually pick a stance.

WRONG. I have been very vocal about where I stand on issues. However, my stand on issues does not change the FACTS about Obama and has no relevance in exposing him or vetting him.

You just link to slanderous articles that are often silly and baseless.

WRONG. I link to FACTS. FACTS that are serious and FACTS that are well documented.

Otherwise, just continue wasting everyone's time.

If you don’t want to read the FACTS that I post, then move along and stop ‘wasting your time’. You know where the exit is .. use it. No one is holding a gun to your head to read these threads and educate yourself on the candidates.

That's all she posts though.

WRONG. I have been here 4 years and have 10,174 posts. I have posted in just about every forum and have posted extensively in ATS, PTS, and BTS. If I have chosen to post in the politics forums for the past two weeks .. that’s my choice.

And it’s none of your business what forums I choose to post in or the topics I choose to post.

if all I did was come here and post anti-Bush threads, there'd be something wrong with me.

Then half the people here have serious problems

Especially if half of them were irrelevant or out-of-context.

REZKO is not irrelevant or out-of-context.
SELMA lies are not irrelevant or out-of-context.
Lies about taking oil company $$ is not irrelevant or out-of-context.
None of the threads were irrelevant or out-of-context.
Lies about ‘not knowing’ about mentor Wrights anti-white, anti-jew, anti-american comments are not irrelevant or out-of-context.

When a candidate for POTUS bases his entire campaign on ‘change’, but then the facts show he is just as corrupt and just as full of lies as the rest, that is NOT irrelevant.

This is a conspiracy site. It has a politics forum for a reason. We discuss the politicians and we VET THEM. We dig in. Welcome to ATS and welcome to the world of conspiracy.

Don’t’ like the facts that are exposed? Feel like you are wasting time? Then feel free to read some other thread.

Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Not sure how Obama is worse than a POW turncoat ...

I have another thread about McCain and the Peabody Oil fiasco.
THIS is about OBAMA.
He claims 'no oil money' and that simply isn't true. It's a lie.
He lies like the rest. No hope. No change.

Originally posted by Sublime620
It's out of context. Anyone's name can be drug the dirt,

EXPOSING the FACTS about Obama's oil money is not 'out of context'.
It's showing that, unlike what he says, he's just like eveyrone else.

She's not telling us anything new,

Again - I AM NOT THE TOPIC.
AND - the exposing the fact that, even though obama says otherwise, he did inded take oil money, IS NEW. It's new to those who buy his lies.

If you are so damn bored .. go to a different thread.

or speaking of anything that holds meaning. I

That's subjective - and plain wrong.

ts the same garbage every post,

Again - I AM NOT THE TOPIC.
And if you don't like that Obama is being exposed .. go to a different thread.

Why can't you make a meaningful post about the candidates?

You are being subjective again. And I AM NOT THETOPIC.
Exposing Obama's lies and his CFR connections IS meaningful.

Why not discuss issues of foreign policy?

Go start a thread about Foreign Policy if you wish. This one is about Obama's OIL MONEY.

Can we focus on that and not who was seen in public picking their nose?

Being caught in a lie is not meaningless.
Being caught in lie after lie is not the same as 'publically picking your nose'.
(btw - eeeeeeeeeewwww)