Covenant theory, Jews and the Nordics

page: 3
11
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Apr, 27 2008 @ 01:48 AM
link   
reply to post by Mark Roazhar
 


No no, what I mean is the story of King Solomon’s temple with the use of magic and all is strikingly similar to the lord of the rings story - almost like a prophecy that will soon be fulfilled. The two towers speak for itself and then you've got the return of the king - possibly Jesus, then there's the all seeing eye - eye of Horus egypt - you get the picture....

‘ka0s69’

Here’s some info -

Genesis 6

And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth and daughters were born unto them, that the Sons of God saw the Daughters of men that they were fair and they took them wives of all which they chose

‘Sons of God’ ? Bene HaElohim – angels

‘Bene HaElohim’ is a term that’s always used direct creation of god, Adam was a direct creation of god, you and I in the natural are not according to the bible we are sons of Adam

“Daughters of men” in Hebrew – Benoth Adam – daughters of Adam

In the Old Testament this term in Hebrew in Job 1:6, 2:1, 38:7 is always used of angles because they are a direct creation of god – in the new testament Luke 20:36. Also the book Enoch was very popular from about the second century before Christ to the second century after. It is useful in understanding the vocabulary and the grammar of the time and clearly in the book the term is used there also to refer to angels, the Septuagint also makes it clear that we're dealing with angels

Verse 4 of Genesis 6

There were Nephilim in the earth in those days and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men and then bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown

What this verse seems to indicate is that these Nephilim were offspring of a strange union. ‘The sons of God’ these are angels according to Hebrew “came in unto the daughters of men” – daughters of Adam, this is not Cane, Seth or any of that, ‘they bare children to them’ it’s those children that are the Nephilim

Nephilim – ‘the fallen ones’ it comes from the verb Nephal: ‘to fall, be cast down to fall away, to desert’

Now what the passage portrays is fallen angels, these are not the good guys, when Satan fell a third of the angles fell with him not all of them but a group of them apparently chose to try to create a hybrid race. Angels can’t multiply they are eternal, the reproduction is a process for mortals according to the bible. At the same time Satan’s got a problem a third of the angles fell with him so he’s got a deficiency of 2 to 1 in the war that comes up, he’s got to find a way to strengthen himself.

Now the offspring or Nephilim they are also called the HaGibborim ‘the mighty ones’

Now where the confusion starts is when this Hebrew passage was translated into Greek in Septuagint, the word they used for the Nephilim was ‘gigantes.’ It sounds like giants and it turns out they were giants but that’s not what the word means, Gigantes comes from Gigas – ‘earth-born’ So in Hebrew they are called the fallen ones and in Greek they’re called earth-born.

Verse 9 of Genesis 6

These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with god

And ‘perfect in his generations’ perfect in Hebrew is tamiym – ‘without blemish, sound, healthful, without spot, unimpaired’ What that verse seems to indicate is that Noah’s genealogy was unblemished, this comes on right after the verses that talk about these fallen angels that have created a hybrid but Noah was unblemished in his generations and that’s one of the reasons that god chose Noah and his three sons and four wives to start over again. The purpose of the flood was becuase the genealogy of man was imperfect due to the Nephilim hybrids.




posted on Apr, 27 2008 @ 02:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by andre18
reply to post by Mark Roazhar
 


No no, what I mean is the story of King Solomon’s temple with the use of magic and all is strikingly similar to the lord of the rings story - almost like a prophecy that will soon be fulfilled. The two towers speak for itself and then you've got the return of the king - possibly Jesus, then there's the all seeing eye - eye of Horus egypt - you get the picture....


Tolkien was a devout Roman Catholic and helped his friend CS Lewis convert, so I'm pretty sure he was influenced by the Bible.
I think you can pretty much scrap the prophecy link at that point.



Nephilim – ‘the fallen ones’ it comes from the verb Nephal: ‘to fall, be cast down to fall away, to desert’

Actually, it means Nephilim mean 'the causers of others to fall'



posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 02:25 AM
link   
reply to post by Mark Roazhar
 


Even so there is more I can relate to the Jews and the covenant, basically the media has mislead the public into believing that Queen Elizabeth II is a symbolic ceremonial figurehead with little or no real power, that she is a cold but harmless old relic who passes her time sipping tea at the palace, nothing could be further from the truth. As British monarch, Queen Elizabeth II is the wealthiest most powerful person on earth, she embodies the crown and supreme world power. Presidents of the United States are forbidden any title of nobility and are subservient to the monarch. The US president is commander and chief of the armed forces based at Camp David, which is known to insiders as Camp king David! Prime Ministers in commonwealth nations like Canada and Australia are also subservient representatives of the British King or Queen, they are her spokesmen, the Governor Generals of the Queens commonwealth nations and exercise the queens power on her behalf. What the general public doesn’t realize, is that their leaders are only representatives of the monarch and do not poses the power, they excise the power, they do not reign – they rule. The monarch on the other hand reigns but does not rule, possess the power but does not exercise it. By delegating her powers instead of exercising her powers, the Queen is left safely outside and above the conflicts and divisions of the political process, she is protected from becoming a target of political hostilities.

Meanwhile the general public is kept in the dark about the true powers the queen actually possesses, powers that she delegates but has not yet chosen to exercise. Her powers include:

The power to choose the Prime Minister and to dismiss the Prime Minister through her governor general
The power to dismiss Ministers and the government
The power to dissolve parliament and call new elections
The power to refuse legislation passed by parliament
The power to command the armed forces and raise a personal militia
The power to read confidential government documents and intelligence reports
The power to declare a state of emergency and issue proclamations
The power to call elections and enact laws in her majesty's name

Few people realize that not a single law is passed without the Queens consent, she has the power to exercise crown prerogatives which means the queen can declare war through her Prime Minister without even the agreement of parliament and even power to pardon convicted criminals.

So why has the queen been allowed to legally posses all of these supreme powers, for the sake of tradition? And for those who don’t know the meaning of the term the crown – the crown is defined as executive powers exercised in the name of the monarch, the actually crown itself worn by the monarch is a symbol of the queens executive powers. The parliamentary oaths act of 1866 requires all leaders of 54 commonwealth nations to swear an oath of loyalty to the queen, not to the people who elected them. “I swear by almighty god that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, her airs and successes according to law so help me god.” Those who do not swear allegiance to the queen are deemed unfit for office, including the Prime Minster, police, military, judges, legislators, lawyers and public servants. New citizens to the queen’s commonwealth nations must swear allegiance to her majesty the queen. Public land and the queens colonies like Canada is called crown land includes aboriginal land, government corporation’s are called crown corporation’s, the central bank of Canada and the Canadian mint are crown corporation’s independent of most government controls.



posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 08:03 AM
link   


“I swear by almighty god that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, her airs and successes according to law so help me god."


...is the oath of allegiance

The second part of which is the declaration:



I will give my loyalty to the United Kingdom and respect its rights and freedoms. I will uphold its democratic values. I will observe its laws faithfully and fulfil my duties and obligations as a British citizen.


You're quite correct about the powers, and they are called the prerogative powers and are used under rare circumstances bu the Queen herself. It would not be correct that she sits on her throne all day shuffling papers thinking about who to fight with next. In this case she has her privy council to do the work for her, giving her time to walk the corgis, open supermarkets and wave at people.
I would hardly call her the most powerful person in the world. In the Commonwealth maybe. The Pope has more power than her



posted on Apr, 29 2008 @ 01:29 AM
link   
(A few more things about the queen you may or may not know about)

Canadian warships are called HMCS - Her Majesties Canadian Ship and in Australia they’re called HMAS - Her Majesties Australian Ship, Canada’s national police force is called the Royal Canadian Mounted police. All government contracts are between a company or individual and her majesty, court summons are issued in the name of the queen and all public inquiries are called royal commission. Commonwealth money carries the queen’s image world wide as a reminder of her authority. The queen is the lifetime hereditary head of state of Great Britain and her colonies and is unelected and unaccountable, it is against the law to advocate the abolition of the monarchy.

The public accounts committee and national audit office are forbidden to examine Queen Elizabeth Windsor’s family finances. The Queens wealth as the monarch includes 54 commonwealth nations worldwide, millions of acres of crown land and resources, thousands of crown cooperation’s and the cooperate City state of London which is the capital of world finance. The Queen’s visible personal wealth which was accumulated tax free until 1992 includes royal yacht, Roys Royce’s, race horses, five castles, the world’s largest collection of jewels, 20,000 old masterpieces and billions of class A shares and blue chip stocks and bonds which have been invested and reinvested over and over again tax free.

Most of the Queens family fortune was inherited from her ancestor’s illegal opium trade with China and the black slave trade. In 1977 the bank of England nominees was established to hide the queen’s personal portfolio of wealth. As the British monarch, the queen as access to privileged information, state secrets and the world’s top financiers. She is immune to accusations of insider trading or conflicts of interest. Her financial portfolio includes; Rio Tinto, General Electric, Royal Dutch Shell, British Petroleum, Archer Daniels Midland and the list goes on.



posted on Apr, 29 2008 @ 06:26 AM
link   
Excellent. So she has a lot of money.
She is the head of the Comonwealth, therefore is symbolised on coins etc because she is the Queen. It is best not to think of the Queen as a person, but the representation of the United Kingdom and its commonwealth. When you stop thinking of her, and think of the title instead, you may then change your thinking

Sweden also has ships bearing HMS in the title and bears the Kings image on the coins
Carl XVI Gustaf has no prerogative powers as such, these have been assigned to the Prime Minister instead.
There has been talk in the past of moving the Queen's prerogative powers to the Prime Minister, but this has (and I personally hope always will) remain blocked.
I would say the King of Sweden does have better looking children than the Queen.
www.niceguyuk.ukshells.co.uk...

Although this is a fascinating trip through the information about the Monarchy, you still have not provided resolute evidence as to your original theory regarding Nordic Aliens, Ancient Egypt and the Queen



posted on Apr, 29 2008 @ 07:48 AM
link   

you still have not provided resolute evidence as to your original theory regarding Nordic Aliens, Ancient Egypt and the Queen


Yeah I’m getting to that, it's a work in progress


As I’ve explained briefly back on the first page there are three city states: Washington’s District of Colombia, the inner city of London and Vatican City. These city states have their own independent flag their own separate laws and their own separate identity

Vatican City is in fact a state, the smallest principality in the world it has it’s own newspaper and postal serves, radio and television station, it’s own flag, it’s own army of Swiss guards and it even has its own prison

Like Vatican City, London’s inner city is also a city state, located right smack in the heart of greater London. It became a sovereign state in 1694 when King William the third of Orange, privatized and turned the bank of England over to the bankers. By 1812 Nathan Rothschild crashed the English stock market and scammed control of the bank of England, today the city state of London is the city state of the words financial power center and the wealthiest square mile on the face of the earth. It houses the Rothschild controlled bank of England, Lloyds of London, the London stock exchange, all British banks, the branch offices of 385 foreign banks and 70 US banks. It has its own courts its own laws, its own flag and its own police force. It’s not apart of greater London or England or the British commonwealth and pays no taxes

Like the city state of London and the Vatican a third city was officially created in 1882, that city state is called the district of Columbia and is located on 10 square miles of land in the heart of Washington. When congress past the act of 1871, it created a separate corporate government for the District of Columbia. The District of Columbia flies its own flag and has its own independent constitution, although geographically separate, the city states of London the Vatican and the District of Columbia are one interlocking empire called empire of the city. The flag of Washington’s District of Columbia has 3 red stars, one for each city state in the 3 city empire, this corporate empire of three city states controls the word economically through London’s inner city militarily through the District of Columbia and spiritually through the Vatican. The Constitution for the District of Columbia operates under a Roman law known as Lex fori, which bares no resemblance to the US constitution.

At the center of each city state is an Egyptian obelisk!



posted on May, 1 2008 @ 04:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by andre18
At the center of each city state is an Egyptian obelisk!


These are obelisks, Not all Egyptian though.
The one in London is not in the centre or Egyptian
The one in Washington is not in the centre or Egyptian
There are Eight in Rome, which one?

But there are other obelisks:


There are 28 known ancient Egyptian obelisks in the following current locations:
Tip of Hatshepsut's fallen obelisk, Karnak
The Obelisk of Tuthmosis III, Istanbul, Turkey

* Egypt – 8
o Pharaoh Tuthmosis I, Karnak Temple, Luxor
o Pharaoh Ramses II, Luxor Temple
o Pharaoh Hatshepsut, Karnak Temple, Luxor
o Pharaoh Senusret I, Heliopolis, Cairo
o Pharaoh Ramses III, Luxor Museum
o Pharaoh Ramses II, Gezira Island, Cairo, 20.4 m
o Pharaoh Ramses II, Cairo International Airport, 16.97 m
o Pharaoh Seti II, Karnak Temple, Luxor, 7 m
* France – 1
o Pharaoh Ramses II, in Place de la Concorde, Paris
* Israel – 1
o Caesarea obelisk
* Italy – 11 (includes the only one located in the Vatican City)
o 8 in Rome (see Obelisks in Rome)
o Piazza del Duomo, Catania (Sicily)
o Boboli Gardens (Florence)
o Urbino
* Poland – 1
o Ramses II, Poznań Archaeological Museum, Poznań (on loan from Ägyptisches Museum und Papyrussammlung, Berlin[7]
* Turkey – 1
o Pharaoh Tuthmosis III, in Square of Horses, Istanbul
* United Kingdom – 4
o Pharaoh Tuthmosis III, Cleopatra's Needle, on Victoria Embankment, London
o Pharaoh Amenhotep II, in the Oriental Museum, University of Durham
o Pharaoh Ptolemy IX, Philae Obelisk, at Kingston Lacy, near Wimborne Minster, Dorset
o Pharaoh Nectanebo II, British Museum, London
* United States – 1
o Pharaoh Tuthmosis III, Cleopatra's Needle, in Central Park, New York



BUT, you've included NON-Egyptian obelisks so these also have to be included, and these are not all either:



17th century

* Aix-en-Provence – Fontaine des Quatre Dauphins, 1667

[edit] 18th century
The Washington Monument in Washington, D.C., USA
The Wellington Monument in Phoenix Park, Dublin
Obelisk at the Plaza Francia, Caracas, Venezuela
Obelisk, Buenos Aires.

* St Luke Old Street (church), London, spire by by Nicholas Hawksmoor circa 1727-33.
* Stowe School, Buckinghamshire – General Wolfe's Obelisk, 1754
* Kagul Obelisk in Tsarskoe Selo, 1772
* Chesma Obelisk in Gatchina, 1775
* Rumyantsev Obelisk in St Petersburg, 1799
* Obelisk at Slottsbacken, Stockholm, erected 1800

[edit] 19th century

* Villa Medici, Rome – a 19th century copy of the Egyptian obelisk moved to the Boboli Gardens in Florence in 1790
* Nelson memorial, Springfield Park, Liverpool, circa 1805.
* "Brightling Needle", Brightling, East Sussex (65 ft), circa 1815[9]
* Patriots' Grave, Old Burying Ground, Arlington, Massachusetts (1818)
* Captain Cook's Monument, Easby Moor, Great Ayton, North Yorkshire, 1827 (51 ft)[10]
* Bunker Hill Monument, Charlestown, Massachusetts – built between 1827 and 1843, the first monumental public obelisk erected in the United States
* Villa Torlonia, Rome – two obelisks erected 1842
* Reggio Emilia obelisk, comemorates marriage of Francis V, Duke of Modena to princess Adelgunde of Bavaria, built 1842.
* Rutherford's Monument near Anwoth, Scotland erected in 1842 as a memorial to Samuel Rutherford
* Newcastle, New South Wales – "The Obelisk", built 1850.
* Wellington Monument, Wellington, Somerset, completed 1854 53.34 m (175 ft)
* Obelisk of Fontenoy, 1860
* Wellington Monument, 1861, 62m (205 ft), Phoenix Park, Dublin, Ireland.
* Lincoln's Tomb in Springfield, Illinois, 1865, 35.66 m (117 ft)
* Brigadier-General John Nicholson's monument on top of the Margalla Pass, GT Road, Pakistan, 1868.
* Captain Cook Obelisk, Kurnell, New South Wales, 1870
* The Dauphin County Veteran's Memorial Obelisk in Harrisburg, PA, completed 1876, 33.52m (110ft)
* The Washington Monument in Washington DC, USA, measuring 169.29 m in height, is the world's tallest true obelisk; completed in 1884
* The Oriskany Battlefield monument in Rome, NY, dedicated in 1884 as a memorial to the Revolutionary War battle in 1777.
* The Bennington Battle Monument in Bennington, Vermont, 1889
* Dalhousie Obelisk, in Raffles Place, Singapore, 1891

[edit] 20th century

* The William Dudley Chipley Memorial, in the Plaza Ferdinand VII, Pensacola, Florida, dedicated in 1901
* The Sergeant Floyd Monument, on US Highway 75, in Sioux City, Iowa, dedicated in 1901.
* Joseph Smith Birthplace Memorial in Vermont dedicated in 1905.
* McKinley Monument, on Niagara Square, in Buffalo, New York, USA, 1907 (96ft)
* The Veterans' Monument obelisk, constructed primarily from river rock collected from the nearby Doe River in downtown Elizabethton, Tennessee and guarded by two short American Civil War field cannon, dedicated in 1904 to Union and Confederate veterans from Carter County, Tennessee.
* The Chalmette Monument, in Chalmette, Louisiana, commemorating the Battle of New Orleans, dedicated in 1908
* The War Memorial in London Square, Southport, Lancashire, England, erected in 1923 to a design by Grayson and Barnish. It is flanked by two colonnades each supported by Doric columns, all constructed of Portland stone.
* Jefferson Davis Monument at Jefferson Davis State Historic Site in Fairview, Kentucky, 351 feet (107 m) tall, mostly of concrete, completed in 1924.

* The Foshay Tower, in Minneapolis, Minnesota, modeled after the Washington Monument, completed in 1929.
* Obelisk of Montevideo, Uruguay - built in 1930
* High Point Monument, 1930, in Montague, New Jersey. A 220 foot (67 m) obelisk sitting on top of New Jersey's highest point, 1,803 ft above sea level.

SOURCE - WIKI
This is not a full list and even misses the one out the one you mentioned in London. How will all these tie in? and if not why not?

By the way, Rome is not a principality as it has no prince. If its seperate from Italy, then it does have to have its own systems in place to govern itself
There is no State in London, its called the "City of London" and they DO pay taxes


[edit on 1-5-2008 by Mark Roazhar]



posted on May, 2 2008 @ 03:07 AM
link   
reply to post by Mark Roazhar
 


These are the three I’m referring to – and the one in London is Egyptian, it’s called Cleopatra’s needle










posted on May, 2 2008 @ 03:51 AM
link   
Well the one you're showing in London is Cleopatra's Needle, which isnt in "The City of London"

Map of "The City of London" showing boundaries



Map showing Cleopatra's Needle


It's not even at the entrance to it, which the ancient Egyptians use the obelisks in pairs to mark the entrance

BUT, I did find this which you may find of interest, which if it IS a work in progress as earlier stated may help:
home.hiwaay.net...




posted on May, 2 2008 @ 06:08 AM
link   

Cleopatra's Needles are a trio of obelisks in London, Paris, and New York City. They were originally erected in the Egyptian city of Heliopolis on the orders of Thutmose III, around 1450 BC.


en.wikipedia.org...'s_Needle

I find it a strange coincidence how the obelisks originates with Thutmose III, to me it seems these obelisks are monuments put in places around the world honoring Thutmose III. The fact is all these and every other obelisk world wide are monuments honoring Amen Ra. Why in the world would the Vatican, a fortress of Christian values erect a monument symbolizing Amen? Also even today Thutmosis III is immortalized in stone in London right next to the Egyptian obelisk!





[edit on 2-5-2008 by andre18]



posted on May, 2 2008 @ 07:58 AM
link   
How can they honour Thutmoses III when above on Ancient Egyptian obelisks, Thutmosis I is listed?



posted on May, 7 2008 @ 04:08 AM
link   
Ah, see your point!

The London and New York Needles were made in Egypt for the Pharaoh Thutmosis III around 1460 BC
The Paris Needle was made for Pharaoh Ramses II
Apparently there were 9 known obelisks of Thutmosis III, the London & New York mentioned above were transported from Heliopolis to Alexandria around 18BC to adorn the entrance to the Caesarium Temple (AKA Sebastium). The other 7 are in Karnak and are available from this link
interoz.com...

Moving back to the original point though, The London (Cleopatra's) Needle is not in the "The City Of London" but further down the Thames
The One in Washington is manufactured in America
The one in St Peter's Square in Rome was (rumoured to be) made in the reign of Nebkaure Amenemhet II (B.C. 19th Century)

So now we've established where & when these needles are from how do they fit in?

[edit on 7-5-2008 by Mark Roazhar]



posted on May, 7 2008 @ 06:17 AM
link   

The London Needle is not in the "The City Of London" but further down the Thames


But still in London none the less, with origins to Thutmosis III and even with him in stone right next to the obelisk.


The One in Washington is manufactured in America


And it's also one of the Cleopatra’s Needles. It was dedicated to freemason George Washington by the freemason grand lodge of the District of Columbia. The Freemasons laid the Washington obelisk corner stone in 1848 and contributed 22 Masonic memorial stones, 250 Masonic lodges financed the Washington monument obelisk.

query.nytimes.com...


The one in St Peter's Square in Rome was made in the reign of Nebkaure Amenemhet II


But the fact still remains it’s Egyptian, though not constructed during the reign of any of the five main pharaohs I’ve been referring too, it’s still a monuments honoring Amen Ra no matter which way you look at it. All of these three obelisks have Egyptian qualities to them.


[edit on 7-5-2008 by andre18]



posted on May, 7 2008 @ 08:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by andre18


But still in London none the less, with origins to Thutmosis III and even with him in stone right next to the obelisk.


But for your theory to even begin to have a chance of holding water, it has to be in "The City of London". You can't just say it's nearby, otherwise you could also say that The British Museum is only a short bus ride away and they've got a lot of Egyptian stuff as well!



And it also one of the Cleopatra’s Needles. It was dedicated to freemason George Washington by the freemason grand lodge of the District of Columbia. The Freemasons laid the Washington obelisk corner stone in 1848 and contributed 22 Masonic memorial stones, 250 Masonic lodges financed the Washington monument obelisk.

query.nytimes.com...

No it isnt a Cleopatra Needle. The link refers to New York
The Washington Monument differs from other obelisks, in the fact thats it's hollow. That certainly isnt Egyptian.

One key point would be that for it to be Egyptian, it would have to be made there.
If they were that concerned on getting one, they could have bribed the Egyptians for a genuine one. Would have been cheaper.



But the fact still remains it’s Egyptian, though not constructed during the reign of any of the five main pharaohs I’ve been referring too, it’s still a monuments honoring Amen Ra no matter which way you look at it. All of these three obelisks have Egyptian qualities to them.


Actually it contains no hieroglyphs so its dedication is certainly not clear as to who or what it was intended for.

You're clutching at straws again.

To reiterate:
The Washington monument is not Egyptian, but looks like one, except it has no hieroglyphs, hollow and was built long after 3,000 years after ThutIII
The one in Rome also has no hieroglyphs and is not built by ThutIII
The one in "The City of London" is not in "The City of London" but IS the only one of the ones you stipulate built by ThutIII



posted on May, 7 2008 @ 09:02 AM
link   

You're clutching at straws again.


I’m better off bringing up some new evidence seeing how this Egyptian obelisk evidence isn’t helping this theory at the moment – and so I give you this………

“The US president is commander and chief of the armed forces based at Camp David, which is known to insiders as Camp king David”

Knights of the temple of Solomon – knights templar ….today’s Freemasons.

en.wikipedia.org...

Today Amen is one of the most popularly used words in the entire world, it is used in religions such as Christianity, Islam, Hinduism and Judaism at the end of prayer. Without realizing it people are all over the world praising Amen, the Old Testament of the bible is the holy book of both Christians and Jews, Amen us used repeatedly throughout the bible and is hidden within the word test-amen-t

God save Queen ELIZABETH
Long live Queen ELIZABETH
May the Queen live for ever

God save the king Solomon
Long live the King Solomon
May the King live forever, Amen

Also if you back to the link amen is used repeatedly throughout the coronation

www.statusquo.org...

[edit on 7-5-2008 by andre18]



posted on May, 7 2008 @ 02:17 PM
link   
reply to post by andre18
 





historical records show that the Semitic hyksos kings ruled Egypt for over a hundred years. The Egyptian people rebuild against these Semitic kings and pushed them into northern Egypt. By 1500 BC a peace agreement was reached between the Egyptians and the Semitic hyksos, which allowed the hyksos people to leave Egypt peaceably and move to Palestine and Jerusalem in the Egyptian controlled land of Canaan. Their gradual and peaceful migration closely matches the bible story of the Semitic Hebrew exudes from Egypt into Canaan in 1447 BC.



The Hyksos ruled Egypt for just over 200yrs not 100yrs.They also did not conquer all of the country because of the Theban dynasty oposition.
They also adopted several Egyptian gods,a strange practise for Hebrews is it not?
And they didn't leave peacefully,they were driven out by Ahmose 1st the founder of the 18th dynasty.(his father Seqenenre Tao II and his uncle Kahmose died fighting the Hyksos.)






And so from Yakubher (Jacob) seizing the throne of Egypt....the rulers of Egypt were Jewish hyksos kings such as Psusennes, Siamun, Amenemhet I and Thutmosis III


Salatis (Sheshi/Shalik) was the first Hyksos ruler,not Yakubher.

Psusennes was a king of the 21st dynasty.(after hyksos)
Amenemhet I was the 1st ruler of the 12th dynasty.(before hyksos)
And Thutmosis III was a ruler of the 18th dynasty.(after hyksos)

www.historyfiles.co.uk...





[edit on 7-5-2008 by jakyll]



posted on May, 7 2008 @ 02:36 PM
link   
reply to post by JanusFIN
 





So, no official history for King of Sweden. How can history of the crown be unknown? Really? Do you believe it, or they will not say where their King came in first place... From Byzantine Body Quard. ( Brotherhood of Royals )


Did you actually read the article you linked to


Here's a list of Swedish monarchs for you.
encarta.msn.com...

If you look at the history of the Vikings and the Byzantium empire you will see that there is a much stronger link with Russia than there is with Sweden.



posted on May, 7 2008 @ 02:38 PM
link   
reply to post by andre18
 





Yes i know a little about the Viking history - they named themselves after their six great ancestors, the six Hebrew hyksos kings who once ruled Egypt. Six – Hyksos – kings = VI-Kings. The ‘vi’ in their name is the Roman numeral for 6 – 6 Kings.



Incorrect.
The name Viking comes from the Old Norse word "vikingr" meaning "one who came from the fjords."



posted on May, 7 2008 @ 02:47 PM
link   
reply to post by andre18
 


Answers to points 21 and 22.

The coin you refer to is from a movie,nothing more.

Caeser called this island Britannia after one of the local tribes.
The oldest know name for Britain is Albion.
The Egyptians called us the Tin Isles.



Oh,and the picture of the crown,that one has 16 stones in the base,not 12.





[edit on 7-5-2008 by jakyll]

[edit on 7-5-2008 by jakyll]





top topics
 
11
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join