It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

US Air Force shot down Flight 93

page: 1
7
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 12:19 AM
link   
The following comment was posted to my blog today (I do not know who the author is -- he posted semi-anonymously; so decide for yourself whether or not you believe him):



"I am an Air Force veteran. I was serving at Langley AFB, Virginia on Sept. 11. (not to be confused with CIA headquarters at Langley, VA). The "Alert Squadron" of 4 F-16 Falcons also stationed at Langley AFB was scrambled AFTER the "plane" crashed into the Pentagon. Because of my position as a ground equipment mechanic, I had access to the flightline operations that day.

My friends were Crew Cheifs and Weapons Loaders, among other professions on the flightline that day. One of my [unusual] duties that day was to drive a Loader (personal friend) along with a rack of live missiles (AIM-9's and AIM-120's) across the active runway to the Alert Squadron and drop them off. I was towing equipment to the flightline, so when it was time to go back and pick up the Loader (and our missile trailer) I was unable to do so, but another member of my Flight (a good friend, and later roommate) did go.

According to my roommate (and I later confirmed with the Loader) the Loader was completely silent most of the trip back to our side of the base, after they crossed the active, he spoke. "They shot one down." JJ replied "WHAT?" Loader:"One of those 16's came back with one less missile than it left with" That was all. As they pulled back in to the squadron area, The loader was whisked away by his commanders for debriefing. I didn't see him for a few days, but when I did, he said he couldn't talk about it, but he confirmed that what my roommate had told me was true.

The US Air Force shot down Flight 93. I haven't told this to many people. I told my parents and other family members shortly after I left the military. They didn't believe it. I figured no one else would either. I kept my mouth shut. Everyone was dedicated to the president and the country (not really) And anything that went against the Official, media delivered story was viewed as unpatriotic. I knew that I loved this country, so I kept my mouth shut. I just can't do that anymore. I know that I don't have any documents to prove it, and I have no way of knowing where the others involved are now days, so I can't prove anything. All I have is my word. and with God as my witness that is the truth."


georgewashington.blogspot.com...

My comment:

All we have is our words. Many is asking why there is not more whistleblowers? Answer is very simple: They are afraid. There is many reasons to be afraid, like this writing tell us. And all you have is your words, its difficult to be specialist in your point of view.

Like in here, people are all the time screaming about more evidence, but even if you had been the pilot who shot the plane, what evidence you have to back up your words, that you did pull the trigger?

Truth is over there, and we have to feel it: We cant know it, but we can hear it. Truth is a powerful message witch want to come out from darkness, and we should welcome all of them who has words to say about it.

Courage them to come to us.

[edit on 13-4-2008 by JanusFIN]




posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 12:32 AM
link   
I believe this is a good post because of the topic that entails. I personally believe that there are many who are silent, because frankly they believe the majority of people wouldn't believe it.

I also believe that there are people who are silent because they feel they did what was for the "greater good" and think they did the "right" thing.

Some people are silent for fear of what may happen to their family.

How do we know that there hasn't been people killed for trying to speak?

In the case of the above, I also believe that flight 93 was shot down and what the poster says is actually very intriguing.

[edit on 13-4-2008 by talisman]



posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 12:36 AM
link   
Perhaps, as he is a reader of your blog, you might point him our way?

Just a thought.

I flagged this as i tend to believe the writer

Cheers

Mungo



posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 12:38 AM
link   
Wasn't their a video of the F-16 pilots getting medals and 1 of the pilots recieved an extra medal but i do not believe it was stated what it was for?



posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 01:18 AM
link   
reply to post by JanusFIN
 

Why is false information so poorly made up?

The planes this guy is talking about were over DC, never in PA. Oops, made up stuff comes out, 6 years too late. Bigfoot like made up story, and this is full of scat. Why do people repeat hearsay, and believe it. At least no one at ATS will believe this shallow sham.

How far is that missile shot? 127 miles, can that be done. But why is the FDR not showing an engine problem, or any problem on 93.

[edit on 13-4-2008 by beachnut]



posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 02:47 AM
link   
Flight 93 was shot down:

forum.prisonplanet.com...



posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 07:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by Markshark4


Flight 93 was shot down:

forum.prisonplanet.com...



The Earth is flat... so says Alex Jones.

Yes Prison Planet is reliable!!



posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 07:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Yes Prison Planet is reliable!!


Funny how people that believe the official story state that certain websites are not reliable but they can use the information from the same type of websites to support the official story.



posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 07:31 AM
link   
I've been to brownsville, fredericstown, uniontown, vestaburg many times.
Born raised in Cleveland, Ohio, but my grandparents were all PA 10 miles shy of WV. God's coal country. Whatever happened to whatever supposed plane had a couple hellfire missile deftly placed in its hind end.



posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 10:21 AM
link   
This theory was started by some entities in the government.

This is a classic disinformation straw man tactic.

Letsroll911 who brought you lasers and holograms, missiles and pods on flight 175 started this theory so it can be featured in POPULAR MECHANIC's debunking 911 myths.


You will know that these shills have a hand in Rense.com, whatreallyhappened, and prisonplanet and other 'leading' sources for alternative non msm news.

Oh this rabbit hole goes sooo deep.

[edit on 13-4-2008 by IvanZana]



posted on Apr, 14 2008 @ 04:46 AM
link   
Please don't bash Alex Jones, the following was taken from George Washington Blog:





georgewashington.blogspot.com...

"I am an Air Force veteran. I was serving at Langley AFB, Virginia on Sept. 11. (not to be confused with CIA headquarters at Langley, VA). The "Alert Squadron" of 4 F-16 Falcons also stationed at Langley AFB was scrambled AFTER the "plane" crashed into the Pentagon. Because of my position as a ground equipment mechanic, I had access to the flightline operations that day.

Snip

"They shot one down." JJ replied "WHAT?" Loader:"One of those 16's came back with one less missile than it left with" That was all. As they pulled back in to the squadron area, The loader was whisked away by his commanders for debriefing. I didn't see him for a few days,











COMMENTS

I believe this Airman is telling the exact truth. That morning my wife and I were watching a TV broadcast that was 'live' with an emergency operator talking with someone on flight 93. The person onboard said something like "They're shooting at us; they've hit the wing", and the connection ended. To my knowledge, that was never rebroadcast. We've never heard anything about that conversation since, or talked to anyone who saw the broadcast. A few days later, my brother-in-law, an air-traffic controller, told us the USAF shot 93 down for certain. Many ATC's were monitoring USAF radio traffic. The official story is diversion and feel-good. To me, none of this diminishes the final moments of those loved ones lost on that black morning. We will best honor these fallen comrades by pressing for ALL the truth of September 11,2001. I think it's quite likely the pilots were not attacked by anyone, but had lost control of their aircraft to an overriding signal to their transponder.

[mod Edit - reduced external quote]
Mod note - Please review: Tags For Quoting External Sources

Using Content From Other Websites on ATS










[edit on 15/6/2008 by Sauron]



posted on Apr, 14 2008 @ 04:52 AM
link   
If the Air Force shot it down, why lie about it? Wasn't that supposed to be protocol? Shouldn't we be more upset that the other planes DIDN'T get shot down?



posted on Apr, 14 2008 @ 04:54 AM
link   
COMMENTS


The Funny thing is... I was convinced that day on 9-11 that we had shot down a plane. As a high school student in Arlington, VA at the time. This day was very vivid for me still. As soon as I got to school rumors were floating around about what was going on. but the #1 thing people were saying was we shot one down! We shot one down. Teachers & Students were saying this. (A lot of Students parents work for very high positions in the gov't; pentagon, CIA, defense dept, military bases) I even had asked my fellow classmate, who's father work at the Pentagon, he even confirmed this. He told me the one in PA. DC was on lock down for three days, no one in or out.... and you go home and watch the TV... No plane shot down? nothing.... The thing that gets me about Flight 93 was that "Hollywood" version of that tragedy!!







On Sept. 12, 2001 I was at work and my buddy called me into his office while he was on a 3 way call with his wife, sister-in-law and brother-in-law who was in the Air Force. Putting the speaker phone on I heard the airman repeat that the "rumor" had spread like wildfire throughout the ranks that they had shot down flight 93. He said the pilot was either from North or South Dakota. He actually was quite excited about it and felt that they had done their job.








considering all that has transpired since, the fact that someone was promoted for being in command of US defenses at the time, having read elsewhere alleging that the 2 people in the F16 that allegedly shot down Flight 93 were awarded medals, and it's debris scattered over 8 miles on 2 sides of a mountain, it is very plausible that the guilt has now forced him to say something. IMO.

i hope more people step forward to tell what they know, so we don't have to wait 40-50 years, before the truth comes out.








Thank you for coming forward!!

Most people of intelligence knew that flight 93 was shot down, military confirmation is all that was needed to make it known.

People, when are you going to wake up, 9/11 was an inside job to create legislation to weaken American's rights and to create a war for more resources for the Elite, not for Americans.

This type of thing has always happened when the people in charge need to justify their won existence.

Thanks!


georgewashington.blogspot.com...






Donald Rumsfeld says Flight 93 was shot down:

youtube.com...



posted on Apr, 14 2008 @ 09:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by IvanZana
This theory was started by some entities in the government.

This is a classic disinformation straw man tactic.

Letsroll911 who brought you lasers and holograms, missiles and pods on flight 175 started this theory so it can be featured in POPULAR MECHANIC's debunking 911 myths.


You will know that these shills have a hand in Rense.com, whatreallyhappened, and prisonplanet and other 'leading' sources for alternative non msm news.

Oh this rabbit hole goes sooo deep. [.quote]


HELLO!

I wasnt speculating.



posted on Apr, 14 2008 @ 12:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by JanusFIN
All we have is our words. Many is asking why there is not more whistleblowers? Answer is very simple: They are afraid.


Maybe the other possible answer is very simple too: They dont exist.



posted on Apr, 14 2008 @ 02:14 PM
link   
Well maybe the airforce did the right thing and shot down the global hawk I mean plane . You get my point it's very hard for an operation this big to have complete control of everything that happened that day maybe some General not in the loop acted out of pure conscience . If you can hide a plane at the pentagon why not one buried into the capital.

I sometimes wonder what if that so called 3rd plane hit the capitol and destroyed it how much more would it of angered us? not to mention the chaos it would of done to our political system imagine wiping out two thirds of congress all the more easier to let W get away with his unconstitutional agenda.



posted on Apr, 15 2008 @ 11:06 AM
link   
No question that it was shot down - there was debris for miles in all directions. It's a no-brainer.

One of the most important things to realise is how they spun it - the heroic battle for the cockpit, which of course was pure fiction. It has just ended up as another part of the coverup. At the end of the day, what we got told had happened was very different from what did actually happen, and flight 93 proves how easy it was to manipulate the real events to get almost the whole country to believe 'the official story' they were being told.



posted on Apr, 15 2008 @ 11:25 AM
link   
WOW! Great post. I would like to see the video footage of the strike. Surely that will HAVE to leak one day



posted on Apr, 15 2008 @ 11:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by chris0871
I sometimes wonder what if that so called 3rd plane hit the capitol and destroyed it how much more would it of angered us? not to mention the chaos it would of done to our political system imagine wiping out two thirds of congress all the more easier to let W get away with his unconstitutional agenda.


I believe a single successful strike against a single landmark building on US soil would have achieved the same response - even if the building didn't collapse. Having 4 planes increases the chance of success in that regard.

A shootdown of 1 plane which was the last in the air doesn't go against my thoughts on what happened on the day. If it was actually shot down I have to wonder whether it was because it was a threat to another site (the obvious) or to keep the plane from being landed safely with the 'hijackers' available for interrogation.



posted on Apr, 15 2008 @ 11:52 AM
link   
i wish i could remember where i heard this. shortly after 9-11, when the investigators were going around interviewing air traffic controllers on what was seen and heard that day, (you guys remember, where the tapes were soon cut up and dumped in many different garbage bins?) one controller stated," we were following 93 the entire time, and the f-16 that following it must have seen the whole thing go down as well."



new topics

top topics



 
7
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join