Explain these photos, page 9
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times


reply posted on 17-4-2008 @ 03:40 PM by Markshark4
Originally posted by ianr5741

Incredible. I've spent hundreds of hours reading about 9/11, and yet this is the first time I've seen photos from this angle.


What really gets me is that if any debris made it through that cross-section of the building, then why is there no damage on the structure running perpendicular to the rings? It clearly would have intersected that wall, yet I see no damage. But somehow something popped out on the other side...


This makes no sense at all.


Where is all the wreckage that MUST exist for such a large plane crash? Not in a single photo I have ever seen does there appear to be anything more than a few small scraps.


Where is all the camera footage?


How could such a large plane get that low to the ground with the phenomenon known as "ground effect"?


If the plane hit so low on the facade of the building, where are the trenches that must have been dug by the engines under the wings?


Why does it seem like there are intact windows where the wings would have hit?


Why was no defense system tracking this plane, monitoring it all the way in to the most heavily defended and highly restricted airspace in the world?


How could there not be any automatic anti aircraft missile batteries near the pentagon which would identify unfriendly targets?


Why has there been no effort made to reconstruct the aircraft by the NTSB like they do with ALL other airline crashes?


Why did bush resist an investigation of the event for over 400 days?


How did the government come to its conclusions of who is to blame BEFORE an investigation was made?


Why was the US and British military already in position for an attack on Afghanistan BEFORE 9/11 happened?


I could ask questions forever. But the point is that there is simply so much guilty demeanor and empty holes in the government story, that for me it simply cannot be coincidence.


This was a plan by hijackers alright. Hijackers of our own government.


This is a great post!

You said you could ask questions forever, I'd be curious to hear your top 50-100 Questions about 9/11!!


reply posted on 17-4-2008 @ 05:00 PM by Disclosed
reply to post by ULTIMA1




If you could post facts and data as well as you do name calling, you would go far ULTIMA1.

It is quite obvious discussing anything with you will only resort to childish namecalling...and zero debate.

For someone who seeks to find the truth, you sure are going about it in an immature way. Quite frankly, I'm sure survivors families would be embarrased about your ways of "finding the truth".

I would have expected a more civilized discussion from someone who claims to work at the NSA.....instead of junior high school namecalling.

Ah well...i'll just sit back I guess and laugh at your ridiculous, factless claims. Trying to show you the truth is like spitting in the wind.

Tootles..


reply posted on 17-4-2008 @ 05:06 PM by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Disclosed
If you could post facts and data as well as you do name calling, you would go far ULTIMA1.



I learned from the best.

If you would do any research at all you would know that i can provide facts and evidence to support what i post.

More inorfmration on the walls of the Pentagon from NIST, your favorite agency.

fire.nist.gov...
The original structural system, including the roof, was entirely cast-in-place reinforced concrete using normal-weight aggregate. Most of the structure used a specified concrete strength of 2,500 psi and intermediate-grade reinforcing steel (yield of 40,000 psi).The floors are constructed as a slab, beam, and girder system supported on columns, most of which are square. Figures 2.4 through 2.8 define the typical framing. Member sizes vary with framing arrangements and special loads.The area of interest
in this study was populated by the typical members shown in the figures. The column sizes vary in each story—generally from about 21 by 21 in. in the first story to 14 by 14 in. in the fifth story—but there are many exceptions. Nearly all the columns that support more than one level are spirally reinforced. The remaining columns have ties.The floor spans are relatively short by modern standards: 5.5 in. slabs span to 14 by 20 in. beams at 10 ft on center.The typical beam spans are 10 or 20 ft,


I will be waiting for your evidnece to show how the aluminummade it through all the walls.


reply posted on 18-4-2008 @ 12:27 PM by jackinthebox
reply to post by beachnut



You and others have made a false statement. Proven false by physics.


Did you bother to do the experiment that I suggested?

Even if the hollow aluminum mass at that velocity could have penetrated, there is no way for the energy to have been focused into that punch-hole coming out the other side.

An aluminum hollow-point bullet will shatter/explode upon initial impact. A steel-core lead round would impact, strip the lead sheath at or near the point of impact, while the steel core went on to punch a nice clean hole through the target.


reply posted on 18-4-2008 @ 12:51 PM by jackinthebox
reply to post by Idoubtit



If the wings of the plane had hit those reinforced steel poles as the video shows, at 500 mph, the wings would have shattered and the plane would have been knocked off-course.


reply posted on 18-4-2008 @ 02:29 PM by jackinthebox
reply to post by PplVSNWO



It's difficult to tell. The data is "turned off" just prior to impact.

Here is a thread on the NTSB flight data...


Official Account of 9/11 Flight Contradicted by Governments Own Data



reply posted on 18-4-2008 @ 02:35 PM by jackinthebox
reply to post by raven bombshell



I can't belive they took your cake plate!

Well, I see you got some apple pie instead.

If you don't mind my asking, did you actually see the plane make impact, or just a plane around the time of impact?

[edit on 4/18/0808 by jackinthebox]
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 13 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags