This topic is in the Political Conspiracies discussion forum.  (rss)


Media Blackout? Robert Kahre Defeats IRS in Court 161-0


<<  1    2    3  >>



reply posted on 16-7-2008 @ 10:36 AM by Anonymous ATS


How did Mr. Kahre account for the acquisition of the coins he paid to his employees on the company's books?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-7-2008 @ 11:14 AM by josephine


this man is brave, the IRS has the power to turn peoples
lives into hell.

a website everyone needs to check out is
www.losthorizons.com
this man is currently fighting the IRS, he has gotten
back money from previous years taxes .
if you take time to read his material, he shows the income
tax was never meant for everyone , only federal workers.

lots of people have received their taxes back, they post copies
of their refund checks from the IRS. this is proof, there is
a lot of proof on this website.
the irs claims theirs a glitch in the computer system, thats why
they keep refunding taxes, haha yeah right.

he has a book to buy, but theres a lot of stuff on his website to get a
full understanding, so you dont have to.

I wish more people were brave to do this. sadly most people dont
want to bother with the IRS.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-9-2008 @ 10:40 AM by Anonymous ATS


i think everyone on this thread has missed the big one. if they want to tax this guy on the real value of a silver dollar,then why cant we claim the real value of a federal reserve note? ( about 4 cents) doesnt it work both ways? how do you prosecute both?
you wanna say that a silver dollar is woth more than a dollar ,then you have to admit that the federal reserve note dollar is not worth a dollar. this is because the dollar is specifically 27.07 grams of .903 pure silver.
this was the first sd minted by the us.
so,if they're going to get this guy for the value of silver,then we should be be able to claim 100,000 as 4000.


Spectors point is what needs to be pushed. This truly reveals the hypocrisy and shows the duplicity of the IRS's argument.

They cannot demonstrate a consistent position as long as it is based on deceit.

They left the door wide open when they allowed the word 'dollar' to be put on both the paper and the gold coin. It is indisputable that their own government mint wrote '50 Dollars' on the gold coin just as they wrote '50 Dollars' on a paper bill.

It is also indisputable that that the law states that BOTH coin AND paper are declared to be LEGAL TENDER.

The following is a quote off the IRS website concerning the legal tender laws of the US:

the Coinage Act of 1965, specifically Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," which states: "United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues."

It is impossible to say that the double eagle gold coins are not a US coin therefore both paper and coin are considered legal tender.

There is no law that states that the face value of gold coins are to be based upon market value or that paper is to be received at face value.

This is just another very apparent demonstration of the IRS coming on as if they had the law behing them which they don't.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:





























ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.012 seconds
Page processed in 0.059 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread