It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Media Blackout? Robert Kahre Defeats IRS in Court 161-0

page: 2
<< 1    3 >>

log in


posted on Apr, 12 2008 @ 05:42 AM
reply to post by Spectre0o0

Thats exactly the problem we are facing. Either the Fed has to go...and the IRS for that matter, or we eventually lose everything (assuming we have not already..)

The real wealth of the US was pilfered long ago, what is being taken from us at this very moment is any remaining wealth we stood to gain in the future. We've become slaves to an institution with which we entrusted our way of life and in return for our way of life, they are offering nothing less than servitude.

posted on Apr, 12 2008 @ 07:05 AM
I have never posted anything on here , but I have a special interest in the IRS as I owe them money. I have found the IRs is seriously full of inconsistencies. As you see by this topic. So we just need to go back to the origin of the maker of that money that states it is legal tender and that it's value indeed printed on the coin itself is $1 dollar. So how can there be any question? Only the IRS knows I guess for sure . So My question is who is policing them? I wish I knew.
I don't like owing them money but with the compounded interest it is hard to pay them off and you can't choose which bill or year if you owe multiple years , which one to pay they use a little of each payment to apply to each bill so it goes on and on. More interest compuonding. Seems like it will never end. And I only owe less than 20.000.00 dollars but the way it is compounded keeps me in debt. Any way thanks for letting me spew

posted on Apr, 12 2008 @ 03:13 PM
reply to post by portbearmike

ask them to show you the law that states that they can tax you. it doesnt exist
they are a rogue extension of the fed, and they only operate for them. they do NOT collect taxes for the services you receive. 100% of what the irs collects goes to the fed. they do not abide by the constitution
they take an oath to uphold the constitution ,they don't ,so doesn't that make them traitors, or since they work for a foreign owned agency,an enemy of the united states?
one standard tax is just a disguise for the same thing,except that you pay it little by litte ,which makes the job easier for thegovernment. excetp no breaks for the poor. YOUR RESULT? TOTAL SLAVERY,WITH ONE MASTER . THE GOVERNMENT THAT NO LONGER OBEYS


[edit on 12-4-2008 by Spectre0o0]

posted on Apr, 12 2008 @ 03:23 PM
Ok, so if the guy is disputing being taxed for the market value of the silver and instead says that he should be taxed on the dollar amount printed on the coin--and if he succeeds--then cannot he be charged with violating federal minimum wage laws since he'd therefore only have been paying his workers like, I don't know, let's say, a few "dollars" per week?

posted on Apr, 12 2008 @ 03:32 PM
reply to post by Threadfall

IF YOU LISTEN, THEY WERE CONTRACTORS this allieviates him from minimum wage and paying income taxes on can work as a contractor for any wage. the laws are completely different.
to be a contractor you agree to work for a flat fee for every piece of work you do,without guidance. as soon as the boss comes in and tells you how to do your job,you become an employee. kinda simplified ,but thats how it works

[edit on 12-4-2008 by Spectre0o0]

posted on Apr, 12 2008 @ 03:33 PM
reply to post by Threadfall

Keep in mind his workforce were all 1099 Independant Contractors. In this case I do not believe minimum wage laws are applicable.

posted on Apr, 12 2008 @ 03:59 PM

Originally posted by SystemiK

Interestingly, he states in the interview posted above that he initiated a lawsuit against the IRS in 1993 and paid his filing fees with 240 of these same silver coins (even though the value of the coins was in excess of the $1 face value). The coins were accepted and he was not reimbursed in any way for the excess. Quite interesting that the gov will accept them just fine but takes great exception to them being used as wage re-imbursement.

I would say that the above sets the legal precedent. If he paid using silver dollars as dollar for dollar to the legal system the legal system has validated it's worth as a dollar.

Interesting thread, please do keep us informed as to how this moves along. I had never heard anything of this and it must be a can of worms.

posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 06:38 PM
Robert Kahre is a true hero and I DO NOT splash that word around. I read the articles and watched the whole video and it takes a guts to do what he is doing. It takes even more than that it takes the highest commitment and that is exactly what the ravenous, tyrannical Fed fears. It doesn't want you to know that it can be challenged. This man has balls the size of church bells and he is a true patriot. To oppose this kind of tyranny takes a special breed of man and we are short of their kind.


posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 11:12 PM
This all ties in nicely with Tom Cryers victory over the IRS.
Many of you may know the story, many more may not.
Either way feel free to research and/or join the movement at


posted on Apr, 14 2008 @ 09:27 PM
Our money is just an over glorified IOU.

If you look at the money it says NOTE and not certificate which
is what it used to say when it was backed by gold.

If our money is not backed by anything what is being stored
at Ft Knox?
Most probably it just dust and not gold.


posted on Apr, 16 2008 @ 11:01 AM
Not enough states ratified the income tax law to make it legal.
It goes on from there, but the bottom line is incometax is a scam....pure and simple.
The reason they get away with it is the cowardice of the people who suffer under its yoke.
Out of 350 million people, is there just one dissenter willing to put himself on the line for the good of all?
I am sure there must be more who would be willing to follow suit if assisted in doing so through an organised resistance movement.
The access to the media is what is making these things unheard of.
With 90% of American news controlled by the CFR we do not get a free independant press that the constitution expressly calls for.
It is patently obvious that the corporations are running everything now......
The goverment a mere rubber stamp for the big lobbies,and big grafters.
Its high time we stopped corporate CEOs and such from obtaining public office, or paid closer attention to the rewards they get when out of opffice.
I believe that the payoffs for services rendered come in the form of after term rewards so they cannot be detected as easily.
Retired politicos getting cushy private corporate positions which pay large for mere consulting etc.
The capitalist and the communist systems are both top hjeavy and corrupted through and through.
Nothing short of radical redistribution of the wealth (and morals)will fix this boggle up.

posted on Apr, 16 2008 @ 11:30 AM
reply to post by SystemiK

Beautiful post- starred and flagged. I said in another post that the IRS and federal income tax is illegal. Huge arguments raged on in that thread and I was brutally attacked for being a lazy government sponger who refused to get a job and work for a living- you know that old tactic!

I have swiped the video for a few other posts and have sent this video to everyone in my database and several key people will pass this on- its speaks to everyone's paranoia and alarmism.


IMHO- anyone who tries to debunk this or support the the government and police are complete disinfo agents/government elitist lackey spies.

[edit on 16-4-2008 by dk3000]

posted on Apr, 17 2008 @ 10:30 AM
Why does the IRS work for the IMF and World Bank ?...

Excerpts from jailed Congressman James Traficants' speech to the House on March 1st, 1993:

"It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; Declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H. J. R. 192, 73rd. Congress in session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Government Offices, Officers and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only."

"...The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a defacto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now
dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States."

"This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H. R. 13955 reads in part: "The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States?"

Interesting huh ?...

Starred/Flagged, Thanks

[edit on 17-4-2008 by FewWorldOrder]

posted on Apr, 21 2008 @ 06:32 PM
The Constitution says: "The Congress shall have power to coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures." Also, "No State shall coin money, emit bills of credit, make anything but gold or silver coin a tender for payment of debts."


Congress isn't creating money. The treasury is doing that under the direction of the Fed. Not to mention all the credit money created by commercial banks. (For some reason "credit" and "money" have become the same thing - a "dollar" - even though they are distinctly different entities, and not dollars anyway.)

A "dollar" is defined and standardized as 371.25 grains of silver (a grain being 1/480 th of an ounce).

We most certainly are not paying our debts with gold and silver coin...

Why has all this changed, how, and are the changes constitutional?

[edit on 21-4-2008 by ianr5741]

posted on Apr, 22 2008 @ 02:26 PM

[edit on 22-4-2008 by SystemiK]

posted on Apr, 22 2008 @ 02:53 PM
Excellent thread!

I'll need to read up on this more, but from what I have already covered, it's very interesting. But, unfortunately, I feel that in the end the IRS will win.

They will change the laws to suit them. I can see it boiling down to this:

If the coin is not in circulation, you pay taxes on it as though it were an investment.

If the coin is in circulation, your taxes are based on what the metal value of the coin is, or the face value, which ever is greater. They will probably come up with some convoluted calculation to determine this, adding yet more pages and another form to an already bloated tax form.

But, sadly, I think we can agree that if the Government OWES you, it will be the face value.

posted on Apr, 22 2008 @ 04:23 PM
I supported Huckabee for no greater reason than to take the IRS down.
...yeah, he probably would have failed but it would get the topic into the public forum. I normally don't give CT stuff much weight but this isn't CT stuff, it is a crappy truth.
I haven't taken any, and don't plan on, taking any tax law classes because it pisses me off so bad.
But if the Country declared Bankruptcy in 1933 (was it?) where is the discharge? Why didn't we go Chapter 7? Can't the President say, "yeah, our debt is done, we are going to start over with a gold, or silver, or oil standard" I don't know how any of this stuff works but I do know it doesn't work now.

posted on Apr, 23 2008 @ 08:27 PM

Originally posted by ianr5741
The Constitution says: "The Congress shall have power to coin money,

I think how they get around this goes into the "it's not expressly forbidden" interpretation of the Constitution, as opposed to the "it's not expressly permitted" view.

The thing is, that our Founding Fathers could(should) have easily avoided misinterpretation by using the word 'Only' in place of 'The' in the quote above.

only Congress shall ...

[edit on 23-4-2008 by FewWorldOrder]

[edit on 23-4-2008 by FewWorldOrder]

posted on May, 15 2008 @ 02:46 PM

Originally posted by SystemiK
reply to post by Spectre0o0

Thats exactly the problem we are facing. Either the Fed has to go...and the IRS for that matter, or we eventually lose everything (assuming we have not already..)

The real wealth of the US was pilfered long ago, what is being taken from us at this very moment is any remaining wealth we stood to gain in the future. We've become slaves to an institution with which we entrusted our way of life and in return for our way of life, they are offering nothing less than servitude.

"Hunt goes on to say that World Bank loans, as they stand now, are not collateralized. They’re saying, we want collateral, so when we loan-swap this debt, we’re going to own the Amazon if you default. They’re going to make their bad loans good by collateralizing them after the fact with all of this land and somebody is going to end up with title to twelve and half billion acres. They have multi-trillions of dollars upon which they can create currencies and loans and they’re going to begin to barter and counter-trade and loan-swap against the United States. The World Conservation Bank is a scheme to monetize land. This will function as a world central bank and out of that bank there will grow a one-world fiat currency."

...and they are actually trying to figure out how to get more. Read the link above and you will see that their greed is insatiable and incorrigible!

posted on Jun, 9 2008 @ 03:08 PM
I was just looking around the web for any recent articles on this case. Not much new news out there but I did find an excellent article at Liberty-Watch:

Good as Gold

new topics

top topics

<< 1    3 >>

log in