 |
reply posted on 12-6-2008 @ 04:01 PM by SGTChas
|
The dilemma faced uniquely by evolutionary creationist when dealing with evolutionary theory, apart from any concern of the materialistic
evolutionists, is the placing of the very credibility of Jesus Himself on the line. As the Bible emphatically states that by and through Jesus Christ
all things were made (John 1:1-5), might it not be reasonable to assume He would have a firm apprehension of all of the details of creation; to
include its time line? Jesus stated (Matthew 19:4-6) “…at the beginning…” man and woman were created and joined together as man and wife. The
use here of the definite article “at”, as well as the Greek sentence structure of this passage leave absolutely NO room for a “Gap” and
“Day/Age” justification for any evolutionary hybrid of creationism out of the Genesis account of creation. Jesus is either lying here or He is
deluded; there are no other possible explanations for the specificity of this passage; the “beginning” in the Greek means just that, the
beginning.
Furthermore, any time one extracts from any passage of scripture that which is not clearly a fuller explanation of its intent; through some contortion
of the original languages into what appears to be a contradiction of a plain text reading of the passage under consideration, they’ve entered the
realm of a cultist application of the Word of God. In effect they have made themselves editors of God’s Word, correcting what the Bible plainly says
to tell you what God really meant. The scriptural warnings against such are numerous and severe.
If Jesus is not lying or deluded then, one need only take the genealogical information supplied in to Bible to find that the earth is approximately
6000 years old and that about 4400 years ago there was a flood. Observable unbiased scientific data would be reasonably expected to support these
approximations; it does.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-6-2008 @ 04:53 PM by SGTChas
|
The law of physics called The Conservation of Angular Momentum basically states that any spinning object that breaks apart in a frictionless
environment will continue spinning in the same direction. Why then are at least two planets in our solar system spinning backwards? Why are there at
least 6 moons in our solar system spinning backwards, with some spinning backwards around their planets? This makes ANY model of the Big Bang Theory
impossible under this law of physics. (The Big Bang Theory simply stated states that all the matter in the universe started as a swirling mass about
the size of a period on this page; this mass then exploded to become the universe as we know it. Cosmologists have taken this a step further to
hypothesize that all matter started as nothing, which then exploded to become the universe as we know it.)
Another violation of law of physics by this theory is called The Conservation of Angular Momentum; is the fact that our sun has less than 5% of the
total mass of our solar system, yet it has 90% of the angular momentum! A physical impossibility to explain from the explosion of any size swirling
mass.
The Big Bang Theory is a big dud.
[edit on 6/12/2008 by SGTChas]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-6-2008 @ 07:14 AM by Neo Christian Mystic
|
You can't possibly believe that the earth is 6000 years old?! Both childish and utter ignorant. You dissmiss all science and progress by saying such.
"In the beginning the majestic God created the great expance and matter, and the matter was lifeless and empty... Then said God: Become light! And
there was a great light... And there were evenings and there were mornings a first age".
That would be a more or less direct translation with alternate choices of meaning for Hebrew words in the text, of parts of Genesis 1. As you can see
God says more or less exactly the same as does modern astrophysics.
To fully understand the bible, especially the Torah, you have to go back to the source and study the meaning of the words used and understand the
stories told as allegories. They have a factual side, but every move, name, place, war - you name it - is also a prophecy and witness of many things.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-6-2008 @ 07:19 AM by Neo Christian Mystic
|
Originally posted by SGTChas
Why then are at least two planets in our solar system spinning backwards? Why are there at least 6 moons in our solar system spinning backwards, with
some spinning backwards around their planets? 
Think out of the box my friend. Is there anything against these planets actually started out spinning in various directions. Look at the moon, it
doesn't spin at all! And what about the insane movements of Mercury, it baffles everyone, but I guess you have a liable eggsplanation for that...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-6-2008 @ 09:13 AM by dave420
|
reply to post by SGTChas
So you are using your complete lack of knowledge about the solar system to deem the big bang theory impossible? And you expect others to believe
you?
If that's the level of your logical reasoning, no wonder you're delusional.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-6-2008 @ 09:30 AM by SGTChas
|
If you cannot assail the facts, attack he who dares mention the "emperor has no clothes"! Perhaps your obviously superior intellect would enlighten
me as to why the law of physics called The Conservation of Angular Momentum does not apply ONLY when speaking about OUR solar system? I've listened
to many lecturers attempt and fail to do so. But then they were obviously not as enlightened as you...
[edit on 6/13/2008 by SGTChas]
[edit on 6/13/2008 by SGTChas]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-6-2008 @ 09:37 AM by SGTChas
|
[edit on 6/13/2008 by SGTChas]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-6-2008 @ 09:40 AM by SGTChas
|
Originally posted by SGTChas
reply to post by Neo Christian Mystic
I guess I am both "childish and utterly ignorant" because I believe the Bible EXACTLY as it is written. I'll take that comment in the way I am sure
it was written and meant, as a high complement and badge of honor.
[edit on 6/13/2008 by SGTChas]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-6-2008 @ 11:16 AM by Bigwhammy
|
reply to post by SGTChas
I believe the Bible EXACTLY as it is written.

Your intentions are good. Really. I'm not a Darwinist. But YEC was a mistake we need to admit that. Just like with Galileo and the sun revolving
around the earth.
It wasn't written in English dude. I am a Southern Baptist and very conservative. I know Baptist seminary professors that have written books on
Genesis. You are misunderstanding the text horribly and discrediting the name of Jesus. I wish you would stop.
[edit on 6/13/2008 by Bigwhammy]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-6-2008 @ 05:12 PM by SGTChas
|
reply to post by Bigwhammy
Please sir, give me examples without the crass generalizations. Koine Greek and the Bible are among my passions. If you accuse me of a disservice then
establish it with two examples at least.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |