It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dave420
reply to post by polomontana
That's stretching it a great deal.
God has nothing to do with this.
Originally posted by polomontana
We have to expand beyond our perception if we are ever going to understand the nature of reality.
God could be the sum of all things. The sum of every energy state throughout the multiverse or the wave function of the multiverse.
This is not far fetched or a stretch unless it runs up against a belief system. Some think any mention of God threatens what they already believe therefore they rather remain in the cave instead of coming out in the open and experiencing the light of day.
At the end of the day the only thing that exists is light.
Maybe all that exists is pure light that gets disturbed by quantum fluctuations which in turn produces an infinite number of universes.
this is one of those meaningless statements.. either explain it consistent with science terms or dont use them since its irritating and wrong
Maybe light escapes into a vacuum and takes on a speed. From our point of view we call it the speed of light but actually no such thing exists beyond our perception.
"a vacuum" means there are other vacui?
where does your "actually" come from?
it just reads like "bluff-word + bluff-word = god + bigger bluff-word"
Originally posted by DaRAGE
Please someone help me!?!??!
Originally posted by polomontana
Your whole post is basically saying, you can only talk about science if it fits my worldview.
Science is not immune to metaphysics, paranormal or ufology. Science is only limited by your perception of reality.
If you are a secularist or athiest you want the world to be wrapped in a box that fits your pre-existing belief system. So when people incorporate science into these things your reason shuts off and your belief kicks in.
Metaphysics, paranormal events and ufology all are "natural explanations" When a person says they are looking for a natural explanation it just means they are looking for an explanation that supports what they already believe.
Have you ever heard of M-Theory? You asked where would the vacuum originate. It would originate in the bulk.
Light is actually infinite and has no speed. This goes back to Plato and the allegory of the cave. You can't see past your perception because ignorance is bliss. There's comfort in the cave.
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
Don't bosons have energy although they have no mass? Bosons have photons in their family a laser is composed of photons ....lasers do damage. so hows that work if light has no energy?
Even crazier All fermions-particles with mass are really bosons temporarily manifesting themselves as fermions.
you know a harmonic of the background radiation. wave theory string theory. solid particles with mass are really just a harmonic of the universal background energy signature. when the energy wave stacks up and creates a harmonic it manifests its self as a fermion. a packet of energy(boson) with enough juice to appear solid and thus a fermion. they then can transition back into a boson from a solid mass state. the transition is a meson particle.
although I do admit that einstein is getting refuted more and more these days. but for lots of reasons other than light has no mass and therefor no energy, but just because something has no mass by no means means it has no energy. try telling that to a destructive laser beam.
I do admit that einstein is getting refuted more and more these days. but for lots of reasons other than light has no mass and therefor no energy, but just because something has no mass by no means means it has no energy. try telling that to a destructive laser beam.
something that has no mass will not be influenced by gravity