Fed Weighs Its Options in Easing Crunch (FED wants to Issue it's own debt), page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times
Topic started on 8-4-2008 @ 09:38 PM by jefwane

Fed Weighs Its Options in Easing Crunch


online.wsj.com
Among the options: Having the Treasury borrow more money than it needs to fund the government and leave the proceeds on deposit at the Fed, which would issue debt under its own name rather than the Treasury's; and asking Congress for immediate authority for the Fed to pay interest on commercial-bank reserves instead of waiting until a previously enacted law permits it in 2011.
The Issue: The Fed has sold or committed a lot of its Treasury portfolio to support markets. Some worry it will soon run out of room to do more.
• The News: The Fed is considering several contingency plans for getting more lending capacity so that won't happen.
• The Bottom Line: The Fed has lots of firepower left before it has to turn to these contingencies.No moves are imminent because the Fed has plenty of maneuvering room. The internal discussions are part of a continuing effort at the Fed, similar to what is under way at foreign central banks, to determine its options if the credit crunch becomes even more severe. Fed officials believe the plans largely eliminate the risk that the Fed will exhaust its stockpile of Treasury bonds and thus lose its ability to backstop the financial system, as some on Wall Street fear.


(visit the link for the full news article)



Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
In Bankers We Trust -or- Financial Socialism for Dummies
Federal Reserve DISASTER

[edit on 8-4-2008 by jefwane]

[edit on 8-4-2008 by jefwane]


reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 10:42 AM by St Udio
Originally posted by jefwane

Fed Weighs Its Options in Easing Crunch


online.wsj.com



The Issue: The Fed has sold or committed a lot of its Treasury portfolio to support markets. Some worry it will soon run out of room to do more.
• The News: The Fed is considering several contingency plans for getting more lending capacity so that won't happen.
• The Bottom Line: ... the risk that the Fed will exhaust its stockpile of Treasury bonds and thus lose its ability to backstop the financial system, as some on Wall Street fear.





watch as the US Fed. siphons funds from the Swiss, the EU, Japan's, London's, NewZealand & Australia Central Banks..

who were all foolish enough to join in a mutual lending agreement with the US Federal Reserve several weeks ago.


reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 11:45 AM by Gools
Check it out!

This is another link to the story that doesn't require registration and contains more information:

Fed plotting how to achieve infinite money

So the Fed is seeking ways to expand its balance sheet without causing the federal funds rate to drop.


They recognize that it's not good for the rates to go too low yet they keep cutting them.

The likeliest option, one the Fed and Treasury have discussed, is for the Treasury to issue more debt than it needs to fund government operations.

Treasury's principal constraint is the statutory limit debt. Treasury debt was $453 billion below the limit Monday. In the past, Congress always has responded to administration requests to raise the limit, sometimes only after political theatrics.


You get that?

The plan is to allow the Treasury to issue more debt than the statutory debt limit to be used by the FED to create a new class of debt instruments. They are trying to circumvent what little congressional control still exists on the issuance of money and spending limits.

The Fed would use the cash to purchase an offsetting amount of Treasurys in the open market; for legal reasons, it generally cannot buy them directly from Treasury.

It has never done so; the legality is unclear.


No Kidding!!!

Another possibility is seeking congressional approval to pay interest on banks' reserves immediately instead of waiting until a 2006 law permits that in 2011. If the Fed paid, say, 2% interest on reserves, banks would have no incentive to lend out excess reserves once the federal funds rate fell to that level.

Congress put off the effective date because paying interest on reserves reduces the Fed profits that are turned over to the Treasury each year, widening the budget deficit.


Great another way to increase the deficit. These people are brilliant!

Although preliminary explorations suggest Congress would be open to accelerating the date, the Fed is leery of depending on action by Congress.


No kidding!!!

Unbelievable!
.


reply posted on 9-4-2008 @ 11:46 AM by Maxmars
Please, for the love of all that is common in humanity - do NOT equate this action with "America".

Americans NEVER willingly participated in this scheme of the money-lenders to consolidate global control of the market - that was done DESPITE American desires. Just because these same fascists managed to install a junta of cronies into our legislative, judicial, and administration bodies doesn't make this an 'American' endeavor.

They took advantage of a naive trust, that's all. And many (MANY) other governments are no less compromised.

However, there is a glimmer of hope in this message, the fact that these financial 'super geniuses' have been compelled to reconsider their time-line shows that they finally see the weakness in their plan. A potential 'flaw' which could cost them the game. They must destroy the world economy much sooner, if there to gain total control, and some inconvenient 'facts' have surfaced about such undertakings. If a popular understanding of what is truly happening begins to coalesce, despite their near-total domination of Global MSM, ambitious world 'leaders' may be able to create a consensus regarding the 'Central Bank' ground rules and their unapologetic profiteering from the pain and suffering of gigantic swaths of humanity.

The Central Bankers are, for the first time I can recall, responding to a situation as if they 'fear' - not for 'us' - but for themselves and their enterprise. If their plans fail - we will all suffer badly (they will see to it) - but it WILL be temporary. If they succeed, we will all be their property - permanently.

Watch the 'talking heads' of media closely now, the comedy is about to begin.


reply posted on 10-4-2008 @ 11:36 AM by Gools
Here is some commentary from a well known economist.

The Fed Is Terrified

The Fed is effectively in a position of not to being able to print money to buy Treasuries from banks, because of restrictions mentioned in the WSJ article and also because the banks are insolvent. Simply put, banks do not have the cash to accumulate Treasuries on their books to sell to the Fed this time around. And more writedowns ... are coming. This will require still more capital raising efforts.

The Fed has already sponsored 3 new lending facilities, yet is having still more discussions on what to do next.

Recap Of Fed Sponsored Facilities

* The TAF (Term Auction Facility) failed to restore liquidity.
* The TSLF (Term Securities Lending Facility) failed to restore liquidity....
* The PDCF (Primary Dealer Credit Facility) will be the next "facility" to fail.

The Fed's ongoing discussions shows deep concern that the above facilities will not be sufficient.

The Fed is now considering borrowing from the Treasury (US taxpayers). Were the Fed to have to do this to remain whole, i.e., have the Treasury underwrite the Fed's balance sheet, the US central bank would be de facto insolvent, having insufficient assets to carry out its mandate.

The perceived invincibility of the Fed's ability to reflate is now clearly in question. The Fed's own discussions prove it.


This guy is on the "deflationist" side of the argument about what type of depression we are heading into (deflationary v. inflationary). I'm on the other side, by I respect his opinion and take comfort when all sides in an argument can see the same problem even if they differ on what it means or the potential outcome.

It's starting to look like the US Central Bank is heading for real trouble. If it fails , this will be the third time in US history. Considering the type of economy the US now has (based on credit and "services") this one's gonna hurt.
.

[edit on 4/10/2008 by Gools]


reply posted on 10-4-2008 @ 01:14 PM by Maxmars
reply to post by marg6043



Be my guest - rant away - this is perhaps one of the few thread where you wont find many detractors. It seems like many of us are 'keepers of the secret history" - I can't more than one out of fifty or so people who have even the slightest notion of exactly what the Fed is.

But what can I say, we're competing with talking heads that attract 'viewers' with Paris Hilton, WWE, shiny new cars and game shows.



[edit on 10-4-2008 by Maxmars]


reply posted on 10-4-2008 @ 01:29 PM by marg6043
reply to post by Maxmars



I agree, I see you are new here, I like your line of thinking and so far your posts in this thread are very interesting you called my attention right away.

I know people don't like to get into historical accounts specially when it has to do with our nation, many people like to take what is spoon fed to them through the bias corporate media and our government.

One of the things I love about ATS is that historical facts can be used for the enjoyment of those that wants to learn the truth.

We are right now watching a historical event in this nation that is going to reshape how we see and perceive the fed.

This entity is taking center stage and cementing its control.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^