It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

WTC 7 Serious Proof of Controlled Demoltions

page: 15
14
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 12 2008 @ 11:43 PM
link   
BOOM! BOOM! BOOM!








And this video is amazing.

Eyewitnesses heard a countdown on authority radio before the collapse of WTC 7.

Numerous credible people heard and saw multiple sequenced explosions.

Eyewitnesses, witnessed explosions in WTC 7 prior to any collapse of WTC 1 and 2.







Hmmmm I would rather believe what eyewitnesses and survivors have to say about the controlled demolitions that they witnesses and experienced at World Trade Center 7 rather than some kids with grudges with a hot link to "Debunking 911 myths" on their clipboard.

Poor debunking.Sigh

Cant debunk facts.

[edit on 12-4-2008 by IvanZana]

[edit on 12-4-2008 by IvanZana]




posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 12:33 AM
link   
Amazing first..lol

Last video..video4. “And this video is amazing.
Eyewitnesses heard a countdown on authority radio before the collapse of WTC 7.”

You have to be joking. Lol This proves you take evidence and spin it your way. He said he COULD NOT hear what was going over the radio-More speculation...Who are the kids twisting evidence from the clipboard now?

Video-1 Same video seen over and over on you tube that Cter’s use as. “evidence.” The explosion sounds could have been anything, including the sounds of floors collapsing, as well flammable explosives. Lets try and be intelligent and realize these people had just experienced tragedy and were confused and shocked as to what was happening. Try again.

Video 2-Don’t even know what you are trying to prove here? What, blasts from windows? Ivan, have you ever been at the scene of a building that collapsed accidentally? I don’t think so….

Video 3-Don’t see what your point is! These videos are easily cut and you can clearly tell this one was cut more than once.

Now it makes a little more sense where you come up with the "I am right, end of story" attitude. You are easily swayed by all the twisted videos on youtube and other sites, and you take what Alex Jones says as the 100% truth without involving logical thought.




[edit on 13-4-2008 by Comsence2075]



posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 12:54 AM
link   
reply to post by IvanZana
 


Also, I would appreciate it if you could respond to the following threads. Since you seem to be the leader of the, "I am right 9/11 was an inside job and you are arrogant and ignorant if you don't side with me movement."

It appears as if you abandon threads when you see information you can not twist and start new threads.

www.abovetopsecret.com...


www.abovetopsecret.com...'



posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 10:15 AM
link   
I tryto not debate with liars and ignorant kids. My time is precious and shall not be wasted on nobodies with pointless, low-iq arguments.


You have failed to prove to anybody that fire took down WTC 7. Your just making yourself look foolish. Atleast you show you got a wild imagination that cannot understand fact.

A time comes when you realize that some people just dont have the intelligence to handle the truth and facts. THis is the time.

World Trade Center 7 - Controlled demoltions
World Trade Center 1 - Controlled demoltions
Wolrd Trade Center 2 - COntrolled demoltions
Pentagon - Plane hit
Shanksville Flight 93 - No Plane, originally a mock plane crash exercise drill.


I know of people who work in the disinfomation department and collect a government check. I know whats on the list. I know whats on the program. I know the truth. In due time names and forums who play this losing game will be revealed.

Sucks to be wanting money. Ever since I hit my first million i noticed how pathetic people are and what they will do for money, even lie about 911.

[edit on 13-4-2008 by IvanZana]



posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 01:16 PM
link   
This will probably be my last post in this thread though I will continue to read it as it developes. The main reason is that this is probably the last piece of information that I could intelligently add to this conversation.

www.serendipity.li...

I highly recommend that anyone participating or even just reading this thread take a look at this link.

If you can read that (and any follow up links within it) and STILL not think something is fishy going on here, then I cannot help you any further... One of the main points for me posting it is this one at the bottom:

Also in February 2005 the 32-story Windsor Building in Madrid, Spain, caught fire and burned for two days. The building was completely engulfed in flames at one point. Several top floors collapsed onto lower ones, yet the building remained standing.

Take a good hard look at that picture...



posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 01:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Comsence2075
 


I think your missing the fact on the CNN video someone is actually predicting what is going to happen....

"THE BUILDING IS ABOUT TO BLOW UP"! "KEEP YOUR EYE ON THAT BUILDING, IITS GOING TO COME DOWN SOON"

Its one thing to have a building collapse in a free fall toward its own footprint, it another to have people predict it!



posted on Apr, 13 2008 @ 08:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by IvanZana
I tryto not debate with liars and ignorant kids. My time is precious and shall not be wasted on nobodies with pointless, low-iq arguments.


You have failed to prove to anybody that fire took down WTC 7. Your just making yourself look foolish. Atleast you show you got a wild imagination that cannot understand fact.



Ivan, once again, I am not trying to prove you wrong, nor have I said I was right. I am trying to find out information and seek answers to questions. Thanks for being so rude though, appreciate it.



posted on Apr, 14 2008 @ 02:23 PM
link   
reply to post by IvanZana
 


OK where is this"Serious Proof of Controlled Demoltions" as I don't see anything here,maybe there's a link here is there ? I can't see it.



posted on Apr, 14 2008 @ 03:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Zelong
reply to post by IvanZana
 


OK where is this"Serious Proof of Controlled Demoltions" as I don't see anything here,maybe there's a link here is there ? I can't see it.


i posted serious proof, that it collapsed due to major damage of main supports. other than that, the rest is just blasphemy.



posted on Apr, 14 2008 @ 04:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by IvanZana
I tryto not debate with liars and ignorant kids. My time is precious and shall not be wasted on nobodies with pointless, low-iq arguments.


You have failed to prove to anybody that fire took down WTC 7. Your just making yourself look foolish. Atleast you show you got a wild imagination that cannot understand fact.

A time comes when you realize that some people just dont have the intelligence to handle the truth and facts. THis is the time.

World Trade Center 7 - Controlled demoltions
World Trade Center 1 - Controlled demoltions
Wolrd Trade Center 2 - COntrolled demoltions
Pentagon - Plane hit
Shanksville Flight 93 - No Plane, originally a mock plane crash exercise drill.


I know of people who work in the disinfomation department and collect a government check. I know whats on the list. I know whats on the program. I know the truth. In due time names and forums who play this losing game will be revealed.

Sucks to be wanting money. Ever since I hit my first million i noticed how pathetic people are and what they will do for money, even lie about 911.

[edit on 13-4-2008 by IvanZana]



I know of people who work in the disinfomation department and collect a government check. I know whats on the list. I know whats on the program. I know the truth. In due time names and forums who play this losing game will be revealed.
Is this why your evidence does not support your thread title?

Are you hiding the list of people with your real evidence? And what is planned for me and others who are not falling for the false implications you posted, but you seem to lump us in your veiled threat?

Where is the real evidence to prove the CD? So far the evidence supports the opposite.?



posted on Apr, 14 2008 @ 05:15 PM
link   
There was video with explosions sounding.

That is a fact.

No fault found on that yet.

However the planes on video, no so proven fact.

Demolition by plane, unheard of before.

Probability does wonders in atoms and Einstein, who would steal
A bomb plans again to bomb the people who did 911.
If he was any kind of a humanitarian.



posted on Apr, 15 2008 @ 06:51 PM
link   
reply to post by beachnut
 


Oh come on now, we don't need to start new conspiracies!

The fact is I, and others like me are just childish, pathetic-nobodies, that do not have the intelligence to understand facts.

On the contrary, I have said I respect others opinions and research before being attacked for asking REAL questions. And people wonder why their "facts" are not taken seriously.

I think the blatant put downs and complete insults show the moral well being as well as the intelligence of people on their own.



posted on Apr, 15 2008 @ 07:35 PM
link   
As I am reading the first post in this thread, I can't help but notice how the "undamaged" buildings around it are heavily damaged.



posted on Apr, 15 2008 @ 08:04 PM
link   
reply to post by docpoco
 


Damaged by which collapse is the question.



posted on Apr, 15 2008 @ 09:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by nicepants

Originally posted by IvanZana
Mabey the wtc 7 was prewired with demolition charges incase of an terrorist attack or major fire, the fire department or a terrorist dressed as a fireman could gain access to extremely sensitive information in the name of fire fighting so it would be prudent to pull it.


So you think that the FDNY demolished it and are covering it up?


Read what he wrote exactly as he suggests. Hes suggesting that buildings were constructed with demolitions 'in case' of terrorist attack or fire. Again more conjecture with the use of terms of maybe and ideas that a terrorist dressed as a fireman actually destroyed a building.

Buildings are not constructed with 'self-destruct' mechanisms in place. But if we go with the conjecture ideas floating about, I bet the tooth fairy exists too and that bitch probably was in on this too, since she can fly.



posted on Apr, 15 2008 @ 09:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by talisman
Comsence2075

I appreciate the thought involved here, but I think we can have good reasons to conclude that something is amiss with certain elements of the Gov.

Recall...

#1. The Human Radiation experiments and how many were involved and for how long.

#2. Operation Northwoods a plan to commit terror for the cause of war with Cuba. The very fact it was planned and was elaborate signifies that the planners thought that something of this kind "CAN BE COVERED UP"
The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba's then new leader, communist Fidel Castro.

#3 Former CIA John Stockwell talks on the deaths caused by the CIA


In my opinion, debunkers cant use supposed past events as proof that these events occurred. I think it affects your overall credibility on the subject and shows your weakness as far as not being able to stay focused and on target.



posted on Apr, 15 2008 @ 09:58 PM
link   
reply to post by DisInfo
 



In my opinion, debunkers cant use supposed past events as proof that these events occurred. I think it affects your overall credibility on the subject and shows your weakness as far as not being able to stay focused and on target.


So past examples of the government acting contrary to the good of the people cannot be used as evidence to suggest that they may have done it again?



posted on Apr, 15 2008 @ 10:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Griff

About your question. Imagine if it wasn't our government but another government and our government is hiding the fact that they f'ed up and let it happen?


I hope you are suggesting the illusive Shadow Government here, because that would actually make sense.

I seriously doubt it was any other government that wanted these attacks to occur. This administration, by admission by all the debunkers here, was hell bent on war with Iraq. Why did we go to Afghanistan and not directly to Iraq, or Saudi Arabia. The only thing of value in Afghanistan is poppy seeds.



posted on Apr, 15 2008 @ 10:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Nola213
Alex Jones Has more credibility in his little finger than all of the government RUN , MSM stations all mashed together....(hmmm MSM all MASHED together into a soup), what a pleseant thought.


Whatever drugs your smoking, or cool-aide your drinking, you must disclose your source if this is really what you believe. Alex Jones is nothing more than a sensationalist on the lunatic fringe.



posted on Apr, 16 2008 @ 12:34 AM
link   
reply to post by DisInfo
 



The only thing of value in Afghanistan is poppy seeds.


And the real estate to put a major oil pipeline through.




[edit on 4/16/0808 by jackinthebox]



new topics

top topics



 
14
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join