It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

WTC 7 Serious Proof of Controlled Demoltions

page: 13
14
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 02:06 PM
link   
reply to post by eyewitness86
 


If your theory is correct, there would still be many people that have direct knowledge of what went on that day. Bush and company were certainly not down there drilling and planting bombs themselves. By your logic, you are telling me that they planted bombs all over three buildings, and nobody has come out to state anything with hard evidence?

I will tell you what, there IS still decent people with a conscience on this earth...really. I can almost promise you that some people would come out knowing the horror that took place then, and the horror that has taken place since for so many innocent people. There would be people willing to risk their lives and their career in the name of doing the right thing. Sure not everybody would, but there would absolutely be some.

I am not saying you are not correct, but could you please give me some sources for these high ranking officials you say have came out about 9/11?




posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 02:11 PM
link   
I think this thread got hung up. It's showing that someone posted a new reply, but it's not actually showing it here in the thread. Sometimes another post forces it through the pipeline. Heeeeere we go!

EDIT to add:

Ta-da!

It worked.

[edit on 4/11/0808 by jackinthebox]



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 02:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by jackinthebox
I think this thread got hung up. It's showing that someone posted a new reply, but it's not actually showing it here in the thread. Sometimes another post forces it through the pipeline. Heeeeere we go!


Yes, I don't know why. The last time I checked to see if anybody replied, it said the thread was only 3 pages long, and your reply from last night and mine were gone. Then when I came back it was 13 pages long with my post..Must be some kind of glitch.



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 02:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Comsence2075
 


I think you meant to respond to me, not "eyewitness." Edit your post. I'll be back in a few to respond.



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 02:16 PM
link   
Jackinthebox, I did mean to reply to eyewitness. I was going to reply to you when I get back but I wanted to check the link out you posted. I will reply when I get back home. Thanks again.



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 02:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Comsence2075
 


Have at it. Not too much there, just something to think about. Enjoy. Glad to see someone who has genuine interest in fruitful discussions.



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 02:23 PM
link   
Thanks, feel free to respond to what I asked eyewitness if you think you can add something. I am interested in what everybody has to say.



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 02:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by beachnut

Originally posted by IvanZana
Here is what the newly rebuilt WTC 7 "Solomon brothers" building looks like,

As you can see how close the other building are and how little damage they suffered.

[edit on 7-4-2008 by IvanZana]




It looks like WTC7 got hit the most. And the other buildings in your photo were repaired.
All that is missing for the OP to be correct is evidence.

[edit on 7-4-2008 by beachnut]



OH YES THAT LOOKS A FINE DEMO JOB TO ME



this looks in no way like the way WTC 7 went down,



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 03:19 PM
link   
reply to post by snoopy
 




Please explain why molten metal was found in the WTC basement over 1 month after the attacks? with 1500F surface temps recorded by NASA.


I



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 03:28 PM
link   
Hi.

I have already stated this on the Jesse Ventura thread,that i am pretty sure i can remember the british news (probably Sky news) saying the American authorities were going to have to carry out a controlled explosion on a building that had been too badly damaged in the initial "attack".

I can remember discussing this with work colleagues the very next day.

Wsa this the same building?



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 03:50 PM
link   
reply to post by scobro
 



Wsa this the same building?


I would assume so, though I did not see the report. It would not have surprised nor offended me if officials had determined that it was necessary to deliberately demolish the building in the interests of public safety.

That is actually what I thought had happened until I really started looking into 9/11.



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 03:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Comsence2075
 



I am not saying you are not correct, but could you please give me some sources for these high ranking officials you say have came out about 9/11?



Twenty-five U.S. Military Officers Challenge Official Account of 9/11



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 04:05 PM
link   
reply to post by jackinthebox
 

They have no evidence. Where are they hiding their evidence. They say some funny stuff, and mess up the facts. That is a funny find. Good job.



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 04:10 PM
link   
reply to post by beachnut
 



They have no evidence. Where are they hiding their evidence. They say some funny stuff, and mess up the facts. That is a funny find. Good job.


Is that the best rebuttal you can come up with?
Now that's funny.
Rock on dude.



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 04:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by nicepants
If such people exist, the information they have is the only thing that can protect them. Anyone with solid proof of this conspiracy should speak up...for their own safety. The media storm generated from something like that would be enough to protect that person from a sudden "disappearance". A whistleblower on a scale such as this would likely avoid serious punishment for their part, if any, in the conspiracy, so that wouldn't be a concern either.


If this were true, why did it take "deep throat" over 30 years and on his death bed to come clean? Remember that he was a top ranking person in the CIA too. What was he scared of after he took down Nixon?


In short, to suggest that there are people with solid proof of a conspiracy are out there, but afraid to come forward, is ridiculous. The only thing for them to be afraid of is not being heard!


Again. Deep throat is a great example. No one can sit here and say that people have noithing to be afraid of. Especially if you yourself are not one of these people.



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 04:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by Comsence2075
If your theory is correct, there would still be many people that have direct knowledge of what went on that day. Bush and company were certainly not down there drilling and planting bombs themselves. By your logic, you are telling me that they planted bombs all over three buildings, and nobody has come out to state anything with hard evidence?


Let's look at it another way. Whoever did this obviously has no conscience when it comes to murdering people. Why would they start feeling guilty now?


I will tell you what, there IS still decent people with a conscience on this earth...really. I can almost promise you that some people would come out knowing the horror that took place then, and the horror that has taken place since for so many innocent people. There would be people willing to risk their lives and their career in the name of doing the right thing. Sure not everybody would, but there would absolutely be some.


There are people who have come out. They are ridiculed and ignored. What do you think about the EMS worker who is on film stating what he experienced? William Rodriguez? Or do these people who were there not count? Why, because the only outlet they have to tell their story is Alex Jones, Prison Planet, Loose Change etc.? The MSM doesn't give 2 craps about it other than to call us crazy conspiracy theorists.



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 04:47 PM
link   


There are people who have come out. They are ridiculed and ignored. What do you think about the EMS worker who is on film stating what he experienced? William Rodriguez? Or do these people who were there not count? Why, because the only outlet they have to tell their story is Alex Jones, Prison Planet, Loose Change etc.? The MSM doesn't give 2 craps about it other than to call us crazy conspiracy theorists.


No, I do count testimony from EMS/Police/Fire. You don't need to be a govt. official to give an account of what happened. I have watched a lot of videos of what people say but what I always think is how traumatizing it would have been to be there and see this horror unfolding in front of your eyes. That mass chaos could cause a great deal of confusion. A lot of the testimony about hearing explosions can be easily exlained by the sound of the building starting to collapse, along with flamable fluids exploding. Although, I am not close to down with my research, this is how I feel as of now.

I also think you bring up a great point by saying that people that did this have no conscience about murdering people, so why would they start now. Great point, however if this is true you must feel that many people not involved would have to know after? You don't think any of them would come out? I am going to check out the link just posted about military officials.



[edit on 11-4-2008 by Comsence2075]



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 05:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Comsence2075
 



A lot of the testimony about hearing explosions can be easily exlained by the sound of the building starting to collapse, along with flamable fluids exploding.


This is one part of my skeptical side that I try to keep in mind when looking at evidence of a possible CD. There were other things that might have exploded, and even a steel beam snapping might sound like an explosion.

However, I do believe that at this point, there is far too much witness testimony and other evidence, that cannot be so "easily explained" along this legitimate line of critical thinking.



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 05:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by Comsence2075
 



A lot of the testimony about hearing explosions can be easily exlained by the sound of the building starting to collapse, along with flamable fluids exploding.


This is one part of my skeptical side that I try to keep in mind when looking at evidence of a possible CD. There were other things that might have exploded, and even a steel beam snapping might sound like an explosion.

However, I do believe that at this point, there is far too much witness testimony and other evidence, that cannot be so "easily explained" along this legitimate line of critical thinking.



Absolutely. Believe me, I have questions, many. Just because I do not feel it was an inside job, does not mean I do not question anything, I question a lot. I question things such as the steel being sent overseas right after, I question how in the world we didn't get Air Force jets up there, I question how this could have happened with all our intelligence technology, I question this whole NORAD thing...on and on and on. I also have a feeling that many things were not disclosed due to national security. If the government keeps so many details a secret, or used excuses, this is obviously going to lead to many theories...anytime the government is not honest.

I do not however, feel I need to question the sounds of explosions. The chaos must have been insane, along with many other sounds to cause



posted on Apr, 11 2008 @ 05:16 PM
link   
Rubble pile is too small for a catastrophic collapse.

The rubble pile is a true sign of a controlled collapse or demolition.




top topics



 
14
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join