|
reply posted on 25-2-2004 @ 10:36 AM by DontTreadOnMe
|
I'm no expert in all lot of what has been said here. But, reading it has led me to some questions and observations.
Way back when, Standard Oil was deemed too big and was forced to break up into smaller companies. Except, those companies were all still connected,
it just wasn't obvious. It now seems that those companies are re-merging to form fewer and large companies. So, now we have big oil.
In the last few years, banks have been doing the merger shuffle. Just yesterday Citicorp (?) opted to purchase some big foreign bank. They are
falling all over each other to buy each other up. So, our money is being controlled by fewer people in larger mega-banks. Doesn't that scare
anyone?
It's not just big corporations that are the problem, it is big utilites, big media, big banks. big government.
Probably all run by the same few!!!
[Edited on 25-2-2004 by DontTreadOnMe]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-2-2004 @ 10:38 AM by Eternal
|
Big companies are taking over and theres nothing we can do about it.
One day corporations will be the only government, but hopefully I want be alive when this happens.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-2-2004 @ 11:01 AM by GrndLkNatv
|
This too will pass
Remember the robber barons at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th century? They were brought down. All of the scum who run's these
giants will come down too, the beauty about nature and earth is what goes up must come down. The only problem the CEO's of these megacorps have is
that they will die, mother nature sees to that and then their spoils will be spread to the 4 corners of the earth.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-2-2004 @ 11:32 AM by IMMORTAL
|
Originally posted by Agent47
My god when did we become so powerless? And when will we wake up? Do the American people even have the ability to be progressive and stop
this dangerous trend?Furthermore and this is a question that sholud encite even more discussion than a black jesus....Is there any sort of good
corporation at all? Now Im not a socialist or anarchist (actually right wing on most issues) but I think we need to break up all
corporations and the sleaze of society. Either we conserve our country ore we lost it to money forever. Now what do the rest of you think?
[Edited on 24-2-2004 by Agent47]
[Edited on 24-2-2004 by Agent47]
[Edited on 24-2-2004 by Agent47]
[Edited on 24-2-2004 by Agent47]
[Edited on 24-2-2004 by Agent47]
[Edited on 24-2-2004 by Agent47]
[Edited on 24-2-2004 by Agent47]
Everyone who is not in the position of the major stock owners and multinational corporation owners are
powerless. The acceptance of capitalism on a worldwide scale is greater, and trade, with a hoardable thing as money, was when people became
powerless.
When will you wake up? You will only wake up when you are ready to let go of the system the worldwide capitalists and people have come to embrace.
American citizens support capitalism, plain and simple, and we who are in the capitalistic countries likewise will not give it up. We depend on it,
and you know that.
I believe that the american people can be progressive, not only in terms of scientific/technological/monetary terms, but in the way of going back to
our roots as a one humanity, sharing, like a tribal nation, where we cooperate with the sharing of resources. Are we intelligent enough to actually
put this type of system into place? Sure we are! If humans can go into space, we can set up a different system to operate on earth, beside of hoarding
wealth in the few.
A sort of corporation that is good at all? Well, they are in it for profit, with the selling of their products. Do they want to share their wealth?
No, they want to keep it for themselves, the select few, who give themselves comfort, and ignoring the poor. A corporation that gives equally among
all would be a sort of good corporation.
Breaking up of corporations is trying to be accomplished by humanity out there. This you should see. The toppling of the WTC, if it was actually done
by Al-Qaeda, was an attempt or the expression against the system that American Government upholds dearly. The mindset after this was: Us against them.
We still have that mentality. America reacted greatly against this "terrorist" act, but did you really "see" what it symbolized? You are unable to
let go of the system, plain and simple.
Breaking the system we are currently in now is almost an impossible task, but there are groups of people out there that are trying to get their
message across. And when they try to do it, the people only react to protect the system they depend on, hence, war on terrorism.
You can't break the corporation movement without a breaking of barriers between people as one. Once humanity accepts their fate as one, then
something can be done to change the movement of the present system.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 25-2-2004 @ 11:34 AM by riffraffalunas
|
Originally posted by GrndLkNatv
Remember the robber barons at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th century? They were brought down. All of the scum who run's these
giants will come down too, the beauty about nature and earth is what goes up must come down. The only problem the CEO's of these megacorps have is
that they will die, mother nature sees to that and then their spoils will be spread to the 4 corners of the earth.
~~~~
point taken...
but also, the temporary 'head' of these corps is a 'disposable commodity'....IT IS the Corporation ENTITY
that will/must survive & prosper!!
these corps/mega corps are still only servents to the
Political-Institutional-Government [ P.I.G.]
aka Beast!!!
thses corps. given life in the legal sense by the PIG Beast...fufill their obligation to the master by being
a type of Sector Boss....just one level below PIG in the
heirarchy of Control of the Masses
Ya'll are yelling FIRE when the Barns' about to collapse...too late to do anything but CYA
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-2-2004 @ 03:54 PM by Agent47
|
Originally posted by IMMORTAL
Breaking up of corporations is trying to be accomplished by humanity out there. This you should see. The toppling of the WTC, if it was actually done
by Al-Qaeda, was an attempt or the expression against the system that American Government upholds dearly. The mindset after this was: Us against them.
We still have that mentality. America reacted greatly against this "terrorist" act, but did you really "see" what it symbolized? You are unable to
let go of the system, plain and simple.
system.
Could you elaborate on this? Im not saying your offensive or anything but your post answered a lot of questions and yet I still dont see the link to
how AL Quaida is actually helping those of us who want our freedoms from corporations. I see the attack on the WTC more of an attack on US strength
not on our refusal to let go of a capitalist system. And that leads me to my next point, a lot of people have argued for a end to capitalism but with
the exception of a few no one has offered a viable proven historical alternative.
Side Note: Has anyone noticed how although Bell was supposedly supposed to be demolished years ago all of its components are today all under the
banner of SBC, I live in San Antonio (There Headquarters) and they have at least 5 blocks of the city dedicated to office buildings, a little to big
if you ask me for a company that should only be dealing with the southwest but we all know that SBC has pretty much become the head of a new Bell
conglomeration.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-2-2004 @ 04:08 PM by Agent47
|
Originally posted by Eternal
Big companies are taking over and theres nothing we can do about it.
One day corporations will be the only government, but hopefully I want be alive when this happens.
Why that day will be horrible!
[Edited on 25-2-2004 by Agent47]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-2-2004 @ 04:24 PM by IMMORTAL
|
Originally posted by Agent47
Could you elaborate on this? Im not saying your offensive or anything but your post answered a lot of questions and yet I still dont see the link to
how AL Quaida is actually helping those of us who want our freedoms from corporations. I see the attack on the WTC more of an attack on US strength
not on our refusal to let go of a capitalist system.
The strength of the US is exactly corporations and the power they wield with the capital they have. If you want to somehow limit the
proliferation of corporations to merge, you are effectively saying you want to topple the very system America is based on. Therefore, the attacks on
the WTC was an attack on the very system of coporate empiriliasm.
I want to emphasize that the attacks on the WTC was an expression, take it as an example. You want to limit these corporations and be free from them.
So, the attacks on WTC, and the subsequent reaction from the U.S Government show you just how much America protects the corporation, and the system
they rely upon. It would be very difficult, taking the attacks on the WTC as an example, to even try to change the system.
The United States is one large corporation.
There are many people, I guess, or groups of people who have banded together to try to change the system for the better. We know what happens to them.
They get arrested by the FBI as communists, and imprisoned for life.
Changing corporate empirialism is trying to change the very system America is based on, i.e. the American Dream.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-2-2004 @ 04:31 PM by Agent47
|
Originally posted by IMMORTAL
The strength of the US is exactly corporations and the power they wield with the capital they have. If you want to somehow limit the proliferation of
corporations to merge, you are effectively saying you want to topple the very system America is based on. Therefore, the attacks on the WTC was an
attack on the very system of coporate empiriliasm.
I want to emphasize that the attacks on the WTC was an expression, take it as an example. You want to limit these corporations and be free from them.
So, the attacks on WTC, and the subsequent reaction from the U.S Government show you just how much America protects the corporation, and the system
they rely upon. It would be very difficult, taking the attacks on the WTC as an example, to even try to change the system.
The United States is one large corporation.
I'd have to agree if we were talking about your original mega corps like standard oil, bell and well hell microsoft. But I disagreee with you because
corporations are multinational today and well out of the range of American government to control them. I think this problem isnt solely the fault of
America but Corporations everywhere because as I argued earlier, Corporations like DeBiers are from S.Africa and immune to anti trust violations. This
Mega Corps are coming out everywhere not just here and thats whats really scary. America will not be at the helm of a megacorporation world but rather
the WTO backed by Multinational Corporations like GE, and Wackenhut.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2004 @ 03:01 PM by Agent47
|
Hey the more I think about it, the FCCs ability to smack down vulgarity like Howard Stern is in a way some hope for punishing corporations, Mass Media
controls so much of the world as it is, I think its positive that we beef up the FCC , next how bout the anti trust laws on the books.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 26-2-2004 @ 03:07 PM by DeusEx
|
However, you must remember that privitization laws are lagging behind technology...by a lot. Advertising is becoming more pervasive. While the FCC can
control the content of said advertising, they can't control the ammount we see.
DE
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2004 @ 03:09 PM by Agent47
|
So even though the FCC can control the message they cant stop the flow and thats what is so dangerous your saying?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2004 @ 03:34 PM by DeusEx
|
That is a danger factor. For instance, billboards cannot be over a certain size by law, but the companies rent them, just like they rent airtime on
television in which to broadcast their message. TV stations put on as must as they can before people get angry, or half hour shows turn into twenty
minutes of programming and forty minutes of hocking total crap. The shopping channel also provides an excellent example of the point- it is all
advertising, all the time.
DE
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2004 @ 03:40 PM by Agent47
|
Anyone from overseas feel free to answer, compared to American television, how much of your programming is taken up by commercials or advertising.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2004 @ 03:45 PM by McGotti
|
Originally posted by Agent47
So even though the FCC can control the message they cant stop the flow and thats what is so dangerous your saying?
The federal part in the term "FCC" is the part I do not like...the idea that a federal agency can control what goes on t.v. should be the most
important factor in seeing just how easily the can spread their propaganda.
The amount of advertising doesnt worry me nearly as much as who gets to control the message that is being sent out to all the unsuspecting peole.
[Edited on 26-2-2004 by McGotti]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2004 @ 03:46 PM by Agent47
|
Originally posted by McGotti
Originally posted by Agent47
So even though the FCC can control the message they cant stop the flow and thats what is so dangerous your saying?
The federal part in the term "FCC" is the part I do not like...the idea that a federal agency can control what goes on t.v. should be the most
important factor in seeing just how easily the can spread their propaganda.
The amount of advertising doesnt worry me nearly as much as who gets to control the message that is being sent out through out all the unsuspecting
peole.
Well if the government shouldnt be able to protect us from the crap of mass media then who will, I understand your fear of censorship, but more than
likely that will slowly become a role of Big Corporations as the NWO takes over, and Im serious, if the government shouldnt be able to stop them, then
who should.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 26-2-2004 @ 03:49 PM by DeusEx
|
Back to Kobyashi Maru, eh? We are put in a place wehere we have the choice of letting a government we don't trust 'protect' us, or to go it alone
and give the yet more evil corporate bodies more room to manuever in.
DE
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2004 @ 03:54 PM by McGotti
|
Yes and I see that point and it is a hard one to decide.."no government for control or yes to govenment control"
Well I guess that boils down to how the people in the FCC are choosen,are they simply choosen by the current administration or are they elected by the
american citizens?{lol ..I know they are not elected by the citizens}
To say if you would rather have the govenment or corps controll the message maybe considered one in the same..you think?
[Edited on 26-2-2004 by McGotti]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2004 @ 06:39 PM by Agent47
|
Originally posted by McGotti
Yes and I see that point and it is a hard one to decide.."no government for control or yes to govenment control"
Well I guess that boils down to how the people in the FCC are choosen,are they simply choosen by the current administration or are they elected by the
american citizens?{lol ..I know they are not elected by the citizens}
To say if you would rather have the govenment or corps controll the message maybe considered one in the same..you think?
[Edited on 26-2-2004 by McGotti]
Why cant we have control over the FCC because the "people" are supposed to be the ones clamoring for a clensing of the air waves. And another thing
I have been thinking about, how does the Federal Reserve and World Bank factor into this slip into a world run by megacorporations and the WTO, the
Federal Reserve Board is supposedly supposed to be able to be controlled by the American People but I think we dont realize this because Mass Media
downplays that angle.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-2-2004 @ 06:43 PM by McGotti
|
I think the mass media is supporting the censorship of its shows...
There has been alot of media attention over the "super bowl boob" but who really is doing the complaining??
I for one do not think it was the majority of the american people that are complaining..I believe it is a select few that have alot of leverage with
the govenment and media that have pushed this issue as far as it has gone.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |