It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Well, it wasn't my categorization... just what I was transcribing. I'll frame it this way: the authors considered them non-fiction when they wrote them, or at least purported to. In fact a big reason the HBHG authors lost their plagiarism suit against Dan Brown was because they'd tried to push off their theories as "fact"... If they're claiming historical accuracy, how can they even pretend exclusivity for the ideas they're putting forth?
Originally posted by ConspiracyNut23
PS: JoshNorton, i couldn't help noticing that you listed Holy Blood, Holy Grail, World Revolution, Proofs of a Conspiracy, and quite a few others as non-fictional works!
Originally posted by ConspiracyNut23
i couldn't help noticing that you listed Holy Blood, Holy Grail, World Revolution, Proofs of a Conspiracy, and quite a few others as non-fictional works...
Originally posted by JoshNorton
When did the ideal of treating people fairly become a fringe belief?
Originally posted by Tha Pope
Are there any encyclopedia style books out there that cover secret socities?