It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Evidence Grows of Drug Use on Detainees

page: 1

log in


posted on Apr, 6 2008 @ 04:58 PM
"There can be little doubt now that the government has used drugs on terrorist suspects that are designed to weaken their resistance to interrogation. All that’s missing is the syringes and videotapes.

Another window opened on the practice last week with the declassification of John Yoo’s instantly infamous 2003 memo approving harsh interrogation techniques on terrorism suspects.

Yoo advised top Bush administration officials that interrogators could employ mind-altering drugs if they did not produce “an extreme effect” calculated to “cause a profound disruption of the senses or personality.”"

-- Permissible Assaults Cited in Graphic Detail --

"Thirty pages into a memorandum discussing the legal boundaries of military interrogations in 2003, senior Justice Department lawyer John C. Yoo tackled a question not often asked by American policymakers: Could the president, if he desired, have a prisoner's eyes poked out?

Or, for that matter, could he have "scalding water, corrosive acid or caustic substance" thrown on a prisoner? How about slitting an ear, nose or lip, or disabling a tongue or limb? What about biting?"

Aren't lawyers wonderful?

posted on Apr, 6 2008 @ 05:05 PM
I wonder which MKULTRA derivatives the CIA are using this time.

Anyway, what would be point of using drugs as an interrogation method if it didn't "cause a profound disruption of the senses"?

Double-speak in action, sirs.

posted on Apr, 8 2008 @ 02:08 AM

Originally posted by RabbitChaser
or disabling a tongue

Yes. A perferct way to get a terrorist to talk.

Disable their tongue????


new topics

log in