It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
These three examples above are different objects, yet they all some how "instantly" appear into view, and they all look exactly the same. No difference in size, shape, brightness, or anything. The are all exactly the same, and show up the same. What are the chances of that??? YES, I DO know how long they were invisible. One or two of them were invisible the entire length of the movie, and don't show up untill a certain moment. When they do show up in the screen, they are STATIONARY. Some how, they gain speed...
So you are going out on a limb, and you are going to pass these off as ice crystals hitting each other and some how acceleraing and stopping. Which means you are insisting that these things are being hit multiple times, in order for them to do the maneuvers they are doing.
Do you understand how far fetched that is?
A UFO teleports in one spot, gains speed, slows down to a stop for a second, then slowly gains speed in the opposite direction, and leaves the screen completely lit, with he same exact brightness the entire time. The light did not "dim" one bit.
You are trying to tell me that a rotation made it go from invisible to visible, then you are trying to say that object got hit by multiple objects to make it gain speed slowly, then you are saying that same object collides with MORE things to some how make it perfectly slow down and come to a stop, then you are saying MORE collisions made to turn around, and MORE multiple collisions made it slowly GAIN speed. Keyword "GAIN" speed, not "INHERIT" speed.
Not only are you trying to saying 1 "ice particle" does this in the camera, but MULTIPLE ones do this.
That is by far the most ridiculous thing I have ever herd
Do you know the chances of only 1 "ice particle" colliding with another to make it come to a COMPLETE STOP??? Naturally?
Yeah actually. A few of the UFO's were in the dark for the entire length of the video before they suddenly teleported to the middle of the screen and then accelerated away with a speed faster than the speed they started with when they became visible.
Damn you know what? Some of those so called "ice particles" are travelling so fast, you would think it would be near impossible to get anything done. That sure is a lot of "ice particles" floating around. You would think that the majority of the vacuum of space is 70% ice.
Some peoples imaginations are wild. ICE LOL! Did you know that ICE would probably melt instantly if it was in contact with the Sun and it had no protection like an atmosphere to save it?
Did you know in outer space, dark is extreme cold, and light is extreme hot?
Well as the biggest consensus on this footage is that it is ice particles.
Certainly things can appear to 'light up' all of a sudden if rotating into reflective side towads the light source, however this would mean that the object is still rotating, meaning that it should continue to rotate, thereby 'blinking' on and off as it rotates, like a lighthouse beacon (but reflective light only).
So that must mean that it was impacted by some other object, thereby turning the impacted object towards the reflective side towards the light source. In that case, unless PERFECTLY impacted face on, some degree of rotation will have been imparted to the impacted object. So in this case as well, the struck object should continue to rotate, albeit a different rotational period and also a different path vector. Correct?
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
Just because people come up with complicated explanations involving debris, ice crystals and whatnot and create reasonable doubt (or try to, at least ), does not mean that those explanations are correct
Originally posted by nablator
and simple explanations: teleportation.
The space tether experiment, a joint venture of the US and Italy, called for a scientific payload--a large, spherical satellite--to be deployed from the US space shuttle at the end of a conducting cable (tether) 20 km (12.5 miles) long. The idea was to let the shuttle drag the tether across the Earth's magnetic field, producing one part of a dynamo circuit. The return current, from the shuttle to the payload, would flow in the Earth's ionosphere, which also conducted electricity, even though not as well as the wire.
These UFO's are not even close to the thrusters! Did you not see the camera ZOOM IN? If the UFO's were closer to the camera, then the pure action of zooming in would have made the UFO's leave the view!
If the UFO was slowly rotating, I would expect the reflection to start from a dim light that slowly changes to a bright light. But we don't see a slow prgression of brightness, we see and INSTANT brightness, that I have timed AT LESS THAN 1 second.
The UFO that you claim is "rotating ice" would have a DIFFUSE reflection, but in the video it appears to have a SPECULAR one.
Your arguments are WEAK!
I don't think you are paying attention enough. When 1 object is stationary, and another moving object hits it. That stationary object has an instant change in velocity.
Originally posted by nablator
You don't have ANY arguments. See, I can write in CAPS too. That makes me STRONG.
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
Who the heck is talking about out of focus objects, and translucent objects??
Because I can.
The thread is about THE MOVEMENT OF THE OBJECTS.
Then do you agree that they could be small sized object near the camera?
Of course the objects are blury! Of course the lenses are making them look round with a little cut out! Why do they move like they are intelligently controlled, and why do they go from 100% invisible to 100% visible?
I agree, and if you read the thread to which I pointed on my first post in this thread you would have seen that I talked about that too, but the size and relative position of the objects influences the possibilities.
Some of these movements are not natural.