It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Pilgrum
The closer I look at the micro-details of the whole event, the more I find that supports the suggestion of AA77 having impacted at the Pentagon while at the same time I'm seeing progressively less against it.
Originally posted by Pilgrum
There's plenty of evidence pointing to it but how do you explain the flight recorders being found in the wreckage if it wasn't AA77?
Originally posted by TheEnlightenedOne
There were no planes that hit the towers, the engine found at the site was not even the ones used on the planes that allegedly hit the towers.
Originally posted by KarmaIncarnate
Cite some sort of credible source to back up what you're saying or be lumped into the "ludicrous crackpot" category with Roger.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
I think we've pretty well determined that a modern hi-bypass jet engine will continue to operate, even when pushed beyond its temperature parameters, for at least a few minutes, and possibly longer.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
But there is still the point about the JETBLAST / JETWASH that people still do not want to discuss.
Originally posted by Disclosed
I'm betting they will discuss that in a "jet blast" or "jet wash" thread, rather than a "jet engine sim" thread.
Wouldnt you think?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Disclosed
I'm betting they will discuss that in a "jet blast" or "jet wash" thread, rather than a "jet engine sim" thread.
Wouldnt you think?
Well you just proved you do not read post or you would have seen that part of my original post as well as several other thread on here was about JET BLAST as well as the engine overheat.
Thanks for keep proving my point about the believers.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
the engines provide 'jet-blast' when on the ground....
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Thanks for keep proving my point about the believers.
Originally posted by Disclosed
Whats that? That believers try to stick to the forum topics,
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Disclosed
Whats that? That believers try to stick to the forum topics,
No that believers like you do not read post or you would have seen that my OP was about jet blast also.
Originally posted by Disclosed
[ You mention jet blast, but your link doesnt show or mention jet blast at all. It mentions THRUST...but show me where it mentions jet blast, please.
posted on 5-4-2008 @ 09:08
Jet engine sim for testing 9/11 planes
Here is a jet engine sim that can be used to test how the engines would have performed.
To show what kind of jet blast the engine would have been putting out at the Pentagon.
www.grc.nasa.gov...
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
I will be waiting for an apology, since you were wrong about the thread not being about jet blast.