It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Why push the engines to overheat and possile damage if you did not need to?
[edit on 15-4-2008 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by DisInfo
Why the hell would they care if they jacked up the engines?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
It doesn't MATTER if it increases or decreases as speed does.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by DisInfo
Why the hell would they care if they jacked up the engines?
But why would the need to push the engines, no one was chasing them. They had time to hit the targets.
Originally posted by DisInfo
Its not about being chased. More inertia means more damage, as was the goal.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Why push the engines to overheat and possile damage if you did not need to?
[edit on 15-4-2008 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by HLR53K
Could it be that the terrorists never spent many years learning what each warning light in the cockpit meant? .
Every aircraft generates a wake while in flight. Initially, when pilots encountered this wake in flight, the disturbance was attributed to "prop wash." It is known, however, that this disturbance is caused by a pair of counter-rotating vortices trailing from the wing tips. The vortices from larger aircraft pose problems to encountering aircraft. For instance, the wake of these aircraft can impose rolling moments exceeding the roll-control authority of the encountering aircraft. Further, turbulence generated within the vortices can damage aircraft components and equipment if encountered at close range. The pilot must learn to envision the location of the vortex wake generated by larger (transport category) aircraft and adjust the flight path accordingly.
Lift is generated by the creation of a pressure differential over the wing surface. The lowest pressure occurs over the upper wing surface and the highest pressure under the wing. This pressure differential triggers the roll up of the airflow aft of the wing resulting in swirling air masses trailing downstream of the wing tips. After the roll up is completed, the wake consists of two counter-rotating cylindrical vortices. (See
FIG 7-3-1.) Most of the energy is within a few feet of the center of each vortex, but pilots should avoid a region within about 100 feet of the vortex core.
When the vortices of larger aircraft sink close to the ground (within 100 to 200 feet), they tend to move laterally over the ground at a speed of 2 or 3 knots. (See FIG 7-3-5.)
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by HLR53K
Could it be that the terrorists never spent many years learning what each warning light in the cockpit meant? .
Oh so now you agree the hijackers were not well trained? You guys keep changing your theories.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Clean configuration, wake turbulence.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Clean configuration, wake turbulence.
Can you produce evidnece of turbulance at the pentagon , YES or NO?
Originally posted by HLR53K
Who's "they"?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Clean configuration, wake turbulence.
Can you produce evidnece of turbulance at the pentagon , YES or NO?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Can you provide evidence that jet blast turned 90 degrees and went straight down to rock the cars? YES or NO