Scientific Evidence Of Life On Mars!! Why is NASA Obfuscating The Truth?, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 173 times


reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 01:23 AM by chunder
reply to post by mikesingh



I assume NASA didn't consider a nuclear powered probe, that wouldn't have the same constraints as a solar powered probe ? Maybe disregarded on environmental grounds, which I can understand.

When reading parts of this thread I can't help being reminded of Monty Python's Galaxy song.


reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 04:59 AM by mikesingh
reply to post by Shere Khaan



Well brought out shere khaan!

Let’s check out some more evidence…

Red Rain

Firstly, as regards the ‘red rain’ over Kerala, India in June 2001, it is interesting to note that electron microscopic studies of the red particles shows fine cell structure indicating their biological cell like nature. EDAX analysis shows that the major elements present in these cell like particles are carbon and oxygen, though any traces of DNA were not found.


Courtesy: Centauri dreams

According to the published results in the Astrophysics and Space Science Journal, an international peer reviewed journal of astronomy, astrophysics and space science, the red particles, which caused the red rain of Kerala, are possibly of extraterrestrial origin.


More on this Here… I will be dealing with this subject later in a separate thread.

Meteorite From Mars


Courtesy: NASA

A group of scientists led by David McKay of NASA's Johnson Space Center published an article in the 16 August 1996 issue of Science magazine announcing the discovery of evidence for primitive bacterial life on Mars.

An examination of a meteorite found in Antarctica and believed to be from Mars shows:

1) Hydrocarbons which are the same as breakdown products of dead micro-organisms on Earth.

2) Mineral phases consistent with by-products of bacterial activity

3) Tiny carbonate globules which may be microfossils of the primitive bacteria, all within a few hundred-thousandths of an inch of each other.
nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov...


So what do we have here? Evidence that life may be teeming in the universe! So is the possibility of life on Mars such a big deal?

Cheers!



reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 07:14 AM by vze2xjjk
Gullivers Travels. I'm told that most of the humanoids wear hats.These people (2 guys) wear hats ,side by side,in a sea of animal faces watching Spirit.Recent pic marsrover.nasa.gov... I cropped a small section from bottom left side and used negative. The large oval "rock" is an indicator,and is probably a live face,but I whited it out to get better enhancement on 20 other faces.Many times it's a sacrifice to lose detail on a few good faces to get better detail on some others.You can always go back for them later. That's why I posted the Oval above pic to show something like what the "Oval Rock" looks like alive..And the rule of thumb applies here.If all eyes are on the rover then chances are,if it's facing the rover it's alive.
But ,sorry Nasa,Bob Cummings is dead,so go fake somewhere else. Love That BOB
Draw your own red heart.


reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 08:58 AM by itisibrian
reply to post by seridium



I wonder about that myself. They are clearly artifacts, especially at high magnification.

Posts like that makes me wonder if they are really being serious or perhaps think its funny.


reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 09:05 AM by MrPenny
reply to post by seridium



Yeah, it's kinda' getting to the point where one starts wondering if those submissions are simply a case of yanking ATS's chain.

20 tiny little heads crammed into that one image, with other creatures crowded in around them.....hmmmm, the surface of Mars should appear to squirm with a writhing mass of biological inhabitants.


reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 10:55 AM by vze2xjjk
reply to post by seridium


Admittedly it's hard to get past the image degradation when dealing with these images,and detail gets lost. It's easier to find a big beautiful image of a skull that doesn't move and get blurred or corrupted by nasa masking.It's a gauntlet,because then,downstream few can see what you are trying to point out,so you get back negativity for your efforts,when,really why waste time?
Even with extra effort few will see the faces I see since I've worked hard 4 years to see them in so much variety.


reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 11:38 AM by itisibrian
reply to post by vze2xjjk



I found a face or some kind of animal here.



The image is found at www-robotics.jpl.nasa.gov...

This photo was taken here on earth. I appreciate the efforts you did, but you got to be careful because we can not determine very much at high magnification.

We all are hoping to find a sign of life or what's left of it on Mars. We got to keep digging



reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 05:20 PM by vze2xjjk
reply to post by itisibrian


I see faces in Earth,Mars and Moon pics. The fact that I can't see them unless condensed in pics is a handicap. Just knowing they are there is amazing to me.The solid ones on Mars I believe are quite different from the see thru beings on Earth. But,I'm pretty sure it's movement that blurs them in the Mars pics. They have a different look than the see-thru invisible beings on Earth I call(native American term) "animal spirits" and are mostly seen in nature,especially with green plants.



reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 05:21 PM by waffles
quote]Originally posted by Shere Khaan
Originally posted by waffles
Did anybody even read my goddamn post? You are the most unscientific bunch of kooks I've ever chanced to hear opinionate, and I thought *I* was a kook.

I cannot believe that the train of logic for this thread that everyone is debating is "Did NASA # with the colors of the pictures? If so, then they must be hiding something, and if they are hiding something, there must be life on Mars! #!"

Aaack.


There are many trains of thought in this thread and the photo colour is just one part. Try checking out some of the other sources and you might be quite surprised where it leads you. For instance we were told that no liquid water can exist on Mars, and yet the surface temperature does in fact go above 0 degrees celcius, and that water ice clouds form at the equator.



I addressed the question of water in my post, and was promptly ignored. Maybe if I had more psychadelically colored pictures of landscrapes with FACES--> written in Paint everywhere someone might have paid me some attention.

Let me restate, since I think my post was too scientific for this crowd.

YES- TEMPERATURES ON THE SURFACE OF MARS GET ABOVE THE FREEZING POINT OF WATER.

YES- WATER ICE AND WATER VAPOR EXIST ON MARS.

NO- LIQUID WATER CANNOT EXIST EVEN AT ABOVE-FREEZING TEMPERATURES, BECAUSE THE ATMOSPHERE OF MARS IS 1/100 THAT OF EARTH, SO ANY ICE THAT MELTS WILL IMMEDIATELY BOIL INTO VAPOR.


You people need to read a 6th grade textbook. Most scientists agree that there is probably enough water locked in the ground and atmosphere of Mars to cover the surface of the planet uniformly with 50 feet of water. The next argument I foresee from anyone that cares to respond to me is that 'OMG NASA is only telling us that Mars has 0.01 atmospheres because the people already there don't want us to know that Mars is just like Earth!'
When you get to that stage, you might as well just deny every single thing we've learned about Mars in the modern age and start talking about the advanced alien civilization building the 'canals' all over the damn planet.


reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 06:22 PM by rikriley
reply to post by waffles



Calm down a little waffles we appreciate your input. That is the problem too many are reading 6th grade science books that have been slanted to stating the atmosphere is 1/100 of that of Earth. Did you mean to say ice would boil off and disappear or did you mean to say evaporate?

We are in agreement that there is plenty of subsurface water that I believe is under pressure keeping it below the freezing point. There are many water geysers that have been detected on the surface of Mars from satellite images. Rik Riley


reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 06:32 PM by rikriley
reply to post by mikesingh



Way to go Mike as the New Conspiracy Master and you deserve every letter of the title because you have put in long hard hours and did your background research to keep us informed about what is going on with Mars, moons and planets of our solar system. Rik Riley
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 17 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 13 days ago with 122 member flags
STOP....Take a STEP BACK....and look at the BIG PICTURE!!
  Posted 19 days ago with 115 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 18 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 17 hours ago, 119 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 13 hours ago, 103 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 11 hours ago, 66 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 7 hours ago, 60 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 15 hours ago, 50 replies