Originally posted by ArMaP
What issue? That anyone can put what they want on a Powerpoint presentation?
Yes precisely my friend

that IS the issue... but more to the point is WHY did NASA's chief scientist chose to include a picture of a fossil in a
presentation... that fossil being a trilobite from Earth and showing it on a rock on Mars ("Humphrey") where both you and I have shows there IS NO
FOSSIL... and why is he presenting an ARTIFACT on Mars (in the photo we have not yet identified)
What is the reason? This to me is a Key point... at the very least this shows a tendency on NASA's part to confuse the issue.
The fact that you found both these slides in a totally different presentation... mine is found
HERE means that many people will see this 'fossil and artifact evidence' yet
no explanation, nor image source, is provided to clarify the issue... Perhaps if we were at one of these, Garvin may have added notes, but we were not
invited

so all we have are the slides...
I wrote Garvin himself... but he did not respond... perhaps if others try... we may get results? In case anyone is ambitious here is the info...
Maybe a request from overseas will carry more weight

I am sure I am not on their 'must reply' list
Dr. James B. Garvin
Phone : 301-614-6504
Email : garvin@denali.gsfc.nasa.gov
Building/Office : 33/F326
Mailing Address : Code 921, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771
Fax : 301-286-1616
Does the following mean that NASA (or Jim Garvin and Dan McCleese) know that there were Martians that look like this and had a city that looks like
the one on the background putting fake panoramas in front of Mars Pathfinder?
Well ArMaP you hit the nail right on the head...
IF NASA does in fact know more than they are telling us, it would then follow that their chief scientists would ALSO know what is going on...
this is simple logic...
So IMO what this image tells ME is that NASA is laughing at you (the public) and this slide is a blatant example of 'in your face'
I am, as you know, thoroughly convinced that in fact they DO know much more about life on Mars than they are telling.. and in fact that we already
have a presence on the Moon and on Mars...
This slide... and the previous one 'teasing' us with a fossil and an artifact are just more examples of the many faces of NASA
I say we make a mass email campaign and demand from Jim Garvin
A) The image numbers of the fossil and the artifact (even though we found Humphrey)
B) WHY did he present these slided showing these artifacts
C)
Why is NASA Obfuscating The Truth?
Any takers?
ob·fus·cate
a: darken
b: to make obscure
c: confuse intransitive verb: to be evasive, unclear, or confusing
So I would say both those slides are PROOFZ POSITIVE of Mike Singh's question in the OP
Why is NASA Obfuscating The Truth?
[edit on 12-21-2012 by zorgon]
[edit on 20-4-2008 by zorgon]