It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hanslune
Who would/could be doing this?
The motive behind it?
Originally posted by daddyroo45
Very nice.I went to the secret archives and typed a search for Egyptian text,
Summerian text
Egyptian papayrus
Egyptian tablets
Summerian tablets
Egyptian and Summerian scrolls
Even Mayan codex.
One would think that biblical scholars would cross refrence other material. Or do you think that they just accept things as blind faith?
Originally posted by Hanslune
How long has it been in operation?
Could such a conspiracy operate without being detected by the mainstream?
What portion of the mainstream scientists are "in on it"?
According to Fomenko, the history of humankind goes only as far back as AD 800.
That archaeological dating, dendrochronological dating, paleographical dating, numismatic dating, carbon dating, and other methods of dating of ancient sources and artifacts known today are erroneous, non-exact or dependent on traditional chronology; that their use in conjunction as 'confiming' one another is a statistical fallacy - probabilities can't be added.
Originally posted by daddyroo45
All you have to do is read a little history.The catholic church has been hiding archaeological evidence for about 1800 years.The vatican library is replete with ancient scripts,scrolls and tablets that date back a few thousand years.
Originally posted by diablomonic
AHA
Byrd, Hanslune, have you heard of "The New Chronology of Anatoly Timofeevich Fomenko" ?
en.wikipedia.org...(Fomenko)
He basically seems to have done the sort of analysis you might do if trying to determine if an essay was a plagiarised from another and applied it to history as we know it. What he apparently found was that various histories appeard to be copies of each other, with names and dates altered and events slightly mixed around, but basic things like length or rule, method of death/loss of power etc staying fairly similar
hehe apparently if you can prove him wrong you can get 10000 USD (whats that, 50 euros? (jk))
www.prweb.com...
and speaking of suppression, history channel would not advertise his book
I'm also somewhat "boggled" that his idea of "comparing history" is to track what the length of someone's rule was and as long as it was "close" (8 years in one case), it's considered a match. Oh yes, and it's okay to drop some of them out, according to his rules.
Originally posted by Byrd
But I do see evidence that he's wrong. For instance, there's a copy of Tacitus that dates to 850 in the Vatican library (so that would make some of his assumptions wrong. I don't know if you're in the mood to read a mildly long-ish web page, but there's a superb answer here about the Tacitus: answers.google.com...
(I might make a list at some stage of some I find plausable as coverups)