It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kramtronix
3/4 of the states already support this, so getting it to pass should not be difficult.
I support it.
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
Banning gay marriage changes nothing about a gay persons life nor does it affect them negatively in any way aside from taxes, probate law, and other legal considerations which should be given to them. We can call it whatever we like, be it "civil union" or other
Originally posted by kegs
Conservatives are funny sometimes. They go on and on about liberal governments being too big and having too much control over people, and then they support control over the most personal aspects of peoples lives - who gets married, abortion, what you can put into your body etc.
Mad.
Originally posted by RANT
Ahhh, I see KJ, you're for "SPECIAL RIGHTS" set aside for Gays. Seperate but equal. Hmmm, thought you were against special rights. I guess it all just depends huh?
Where'd you get that idea from?
So Gays get this special legal union thing, and straights get (not a right) but the PRIVELEGE of marriage. How nice for you all smug and hypocritical, rebel without a clue.
No stupid. I didn't comment on how it should work. I think that ALL unions going through the state (not a church) should be civil unions (to include straight and gay people). They would be afforded the same rights, but not the title. They would get a different licence.
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
They would be afforded the same rights, but not the title. They would get a different licence.
But thanks for putting words in my mouth.
Originally posted by RANT
If the words fit, SUCK ON 'EM.
They don't fit, cause you put them there. Thanks for dreaming what I mean though.
Can you say SEPERATE BUT EQUAL?
This is not even close to the same thing, but it's cool, shout your banner phrase from the rooftops cause it makes others sound like they support racism. Let the religious people have the term. The only thing the government is required to give is the rights and I am all for that.
I'm a proud son a bitch by the way and will say whatever I think. However, if it's a gay issue, or womens issue or minority issue I'm not STUPID enough to speak for them.
That is by far the least intellegent thing you could possibly say. Hell, if it was only gay people speaking for gay marriage or women's rights, they would have been trounced by now. It's stupid NOT to speak for what you believe, as misguilded as I think it is.
I defer to those affected. Interesting point of view isn't it? Think you could handle it?
Sure, one less person to fight. Thanks for hindering your causes.