So, one group advances a theory, another group debunks the theory, but still no-one is any the wiser.
It seems the battle lines have been drawn, and that this will continue for some time as the two sides have at it.
Henrik Svensmark has already disoputed this claim and is "unimpressed" according to the article.
I'm also a little confused as to how you can say there is no effect based only on the last 20 years...
news.bbc.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)

