It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Komodo
reply to post by ST SIR 86
I totally agree!!!!!!! Anyone with a basic understand of physics KNOWS that even at the 'supposed' 500mph of which the impact was... jet airliner parts DO NOT & CAN NOT completely evaporate upon impact!
Airliners in history that nose drive have ALWAYS scattered debris over a very wide area..
Originally posted by beachnut
There is not one thing about the flying on 9/11 that the terrorist needed flight training for. No one has yet to point out one maneuver or flying feat the terrorist did on 9/11 that required flight training. This is why kids who have never flown can hop in a simulator and hit buildings. Any one who can try, could do it.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Oh and it was only 1 side of the Pentagon which is 77 feet hight about 1,000 feet long. So he had a kind of small area to aim at, not the whole building.
Any kid can turn the plane. The terrorist bank in the 330 degree turn was sloppy. BTW, that turn was boring, it is simple to do, so do not let the number scare you. That is not an issue. Ask a pilot. How are you able to turn your car around? I mean if you stand up now and turn around you have executed a 360 degree turn. Wow, who trained you?
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Well you forgot about the 360 degree turn that flight 77 made before hitting the Pentagon.
A perfect 360 degree turn (with no changes to the flight controls, accoding to the FDR) and come out lined up perfectly with the Pentagon.
Oh and it was only 1 side of the Pentagon which is 77 feet hight about 1,000 feet long. So he had a kind of small area to aim at, not the whole building.
Also ATCs thought flight 77 was a military plane because of the spped and manuevers it was doing.
snoopy, no the B777 is not fly-by-wire....except for the throttles.
That would have been a highly experienced pilot probably doing no more than 200 mph. Not a person who has never flown a 757 flying at 500mph and dodging obstacles.
I have put kids in simulators who have never flown and they hit the WTC towers with wings level,
Originally posted by Disclosed Of course it is only going to hit one side. One plane - one side.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Back to the turn....I'd like to see real DFDR data, compared to the TRACON data...
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Disclosed Of course it is only going to hit one side. One plane - one side.
Well thanks for agreeing with me that the pilot could only see 1 sied of the building and it would have been a small target at the speed he was going.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Disclosed Of course it is only going to hit one side. One plane - one side.
Well thanks for agreeing with me that the pilot could only see 1 sied of the building and it would have been a small target at the speed he was going.
Originally posted by beachnut
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Disclosed Of course it is only going to hit one side. One plane - one side.
Well thanks for agreeing with me that the pilot could only see 1 sied of the building and it would have been a small target at the speed he was going.
A 77 foot tall target is easy to hit. If a pilot can not hit a 77 foot standing target they can not land precisely enough to be a pilot. If they hit low, the crash before the runway, if the go over, they land long. On 9/11 if Hani hit high he would have still killed everyone on the plane and do great damage to the Pentagon, so his target was BIG.
A standing target is easy to hit. Hani did it and all of 9/11 truth call him the pilot who can't fly. I suspect those people have an agenda or have not flown yet.
Why would you think hiting something standing up 77 feet would be hard to hit? What if he was aiming at the roof, is he a bad pilot?
Originally posted by ST SIR 86
Yeah but the airplane theory now says its possible?
however i wont change my stance on this ..... No way that i could have been an airplane
Not enough mess on the front lawn! ....
Originally posted by beachnut
A 77 foot tall target is easy to hit.
Originally posted by beachnut
It looks exactly like 77 hit the Pentagon. But that is just the expert testimony of a trained accident investigator.