It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dismanrc
You show people photos
You show people video
You show people eye witness reports
You could even stand some people right in front of something.
But they still believe what they want to believe.
You show people photos of a small amount of debri.
You show a video we have all aready seen and considered
You show people eye witness reports con and we have seen witnesses who say pro
If I had been there, I would be in jail right now for posting photos of evidence tampering.
We believe what we believe based upon our consdioeration of the evidence and as I said, even if it was a 737, I know without a doubt that 9-11 was a Inside Job.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Chad Brooks (PentaCon) also thot it was a 737, and a UNITED Airlines one using a paintjob they didn't even use until 2004. So a 737 rashed into the Pentagon? Hmmm... As long as you think it impacted, I won't argue the point.
Quick! Look at this pic for 2 seconds only, no research.
Was that a 737 or a 757? Report accurately!
I'll post the answer later.
JPM - sounds like a nifty smoking gun picture. Hope you can find it again (hint - Google image search).
Others - thanks for the stars.
Originally posted by want2believe
I dont understand why a missile would have been shot at the pentagon, These would be the people involved in any conspiracy. Why would you blow yourself up. I dont buy it However I do wonder if explosives could be involve with the buildings, just because of building 7 and the fact I have not seen a good explanation for it falling
Originally posted by shiman
Its pretty much common knowledge that those planes that hit the twin towers were not 757.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by 281011
281011, it seems evident that non-pilots have difficulty identifing aircraft types. Happens all the time, and what is in a quite obvious way, with that B727 picture!!
A B737 and B757 have obvious similarities, from a distance. Especially since AA only flies the B737-800 model, which is stretched, not as long as a B757 of course. AND the engines don't have the 'squashed' look as you see on the B737-300, -400 and -500. (those are the SNECMA engines....it's the cowling underneath that is 'squashed' to provide extra clearance in crosswind landings...the engines are quite round!).
Originally posted by azzllin
I have never gone for the whole conspiracy thing for the pentagon, but had a feeling that something was not right, now if im right something here is or has been deliberately changed and i need you all to check it out for me?
If im right it is going to knock this thread on its ass, so please can you check?
Ok the video on the link the OP posted at the end shows the video from the security booth? that was the only footage released am i right?
So how come this is the first time after seeing this footage dozens of times that there is a plane in the video? and i mean an honest to god whole AA plane? wasn't there the last time i saw this, i even just checked on you tube again and it is different, go see for yourselves, i think someone is trying to play a game, and is it coincidence that that Ron Paul fella is advertised right after?
Please check and let me know , or everyone know, talk about in your face manipulation if i am..