Let's see what the common ideas are about 9/11, and see if we can eliminate a few to maybe shine some light on this otherwise confusing event.
The official version is that 9/11 was an organized attack on United States conducted by an Islamic terrorist organization called Al Qaeda. I won't
get into details... but it doesn't hold up to scrutiny. There is no evidence pointing towards this, and seems as if the govenment knew exactly who
the perpetrators were all too quickly. Also the many inconsistencies with their stories, some of which were later changed, and the incompatibilities
of the official version to the claims of others who have supposedly been on the scene... etc. Also, considering the Pentagon attack and the obvious
issues with evidence in that area.. like the damage on the building, the lawn, the debris... I won't go into too many details. The point is, the
official version doesn't seem to work too well now.
This leads to suspicion of foul play, and many theories arise. One of which seems to be that the war on Afghanistan and Iraq isn't about terrorism,
it is about oil. I'm rather curious... and a little confused by this. It seems plausible that it may be about oil, but what about the BILLIONS spent
on the war, where does that come in? Aren't they actually LOSING money that no amount of middle eastern oil can compensate for? What exactly am I
missing here... they go to war for oil, and spend over $100 billion to get oil that is worth less than the total spent to obtain it? If I'm wrong,
then how much would all middle eastern oil hypothetically cost?
Although one idea about 9/11 does seem to stick in my mind and just won't go away. It DID greatly help them eliminate many of our freedoms, and
greatly expand the powers of FBI, CIA, NSA and other letters of the alphabet
Now, the Secret Pentagon Report is supposedly leaked that shows that we're approaching climate change at cataclysmic proportions. Does it seem
rational that 9/11 was simply a beginning, to terrify a nation with an otherwise false sense of security, and make us docile enough to allow for more
powers to be given to the elite and freedoms taken away from us in the name of security, and THEN to continue with fear-tactics as they introduce more
How does the possible climate change play into this? Well, could they not take away MORE of our freedoms if we're on the verge of some kind of
possible national destruction.. as some scientists are suggesting that the threat level of the climate change is far in excess of the "terrorist"
threat. It seems to me that this could allow them to either militarize the nation, or claim that they need more powers to protect citizens not only
from terrorists but now also from nature.
Maybe the climatic changes really DO begin to occur, and just as the people are in chaos and panic, the governments grab the opportunity to declare
martial law in order to at least attempt to preserve "peace". This is also the time when the New World Order can most easily arise, and also the
time when the introduction of Aliens as our "saviors" can also occur... in the midst of chaos, panic and confusion on the planet.
But what I'm really curious about is the cost of the war VS the value of the oil. What makes someone believe that we aren't losing money even if we
monopolize the middle eastern oil... like I said, it doesn't seem to be able to make up for the money spent to get there and obtain it.