 |
|
Topic started on 31-3-2008 @ 09:17 PM by helium3
|
I have been going over my JFK research material and wanted to named my top 3 gunman:
1. Badge man (Could be bottom 2 or unknown)
2. James Files
3. Lucien Sarti
involved:
George H. W. Bush (had to play some part in the assassination)
I would be keen to hear other peoples opinions on who they think was involved or pulled the trigger.
[edit on 31-3-2008 by helium3]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-3-2008 @ 09:30 PM by Solarskye
|
Why it was Lee Harvey Oswald who assassinated JFK. It's in the history books and is teached in government schools.
Seriously I think it's a conspiracy that will never be solved. If they can keep top secret things secret then why can't they do the same with JFK.
Only if someone on their death bed spilled the beans about the assassination and had absolute proof to hand over to trusted people would we know, but
then my bet would be it would still be a conspiracy and the fellow on the death bed would be shot before he died. Maybe it was the guy in the bushes.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-3-2008 @ 10:57 PM by lnaphx
|
I always had an idea that it was Jacqueline's family connections that got it happening. After "Happy Birthday, Mr. President" things went
downhill, and someone's wealthy and powerful daddy could not handle that sort of crap.
Another idea is the Freemasons, or a similar secret society group. I think they had to do it to keep the Kennedy from making some laws about exposing
things.
The most magnetic personalities always seem to pull in the worst types of punishers around. Like trophy kills or something. I don't want to get
into murder-psychology at the moment.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-4-2008 @ 01:57 AM by jackinthebox
|
I think it was the Federal Reserve Bank, working through Skull and Bones and then finally the big-money Texans were the lowest on the totem pole.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-4-2008 @ 06:04 AM by helium3
|
Originally posted by jackinthebox
Federal Reserve Bank 
I think JFK posed a massive threat to the Reserve Bank with returning to a sliver standand, also Israel was not to happy with JFK's inspections of
there so called nonexistent nuclear weapons. Id say there was a queue around the block of people wanting to kill JFK.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-4-2008 @ 06:10 AM by Peruvianmonk
|
I heard it was Booba Fet with the assistance of Master Chief from Halo  Will we ever know? Iv'e seen many things on who killed him and none of
them are compelling enough for me to believe them. But if i was forced i would say it was Harvey Oswald, backed by a conspiracy involving the mafia
and radical elements of the government.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-4-2008 @ 06:24 AM by helium3
|
Originally posted by Peruvianmonk
i would say it was Harvey Oswald 
So you mean to say that knowing Oswald shot JFK from behind his head was forced back towards the shooter....reverse physics ?.
Has anyone seen this clip where Jack Ruby tells reporter "it was Johnson!" ?
www.youtube.com...&hl=en
[edit on 1-4-2008 by helium3]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-4-2008 @ 06:38 AM by Peruvianmonk
|
reply to post by helium3
Yes that is what i am saying............................  Master Chief must have been involved.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-4-2008 @ 06:40 AM by Karlhungis
|
I think the JFK conspiracy is the classic case of how the government can cover up any large scale conspiracy. Once people started to question the
official line, they simply start fanning the flames of conspiracy by dumping all kinds of false leads, bogus info and new theory after new theory.
Combine that with public ridicule of the people questioning it and viola, here we are.
Decades later, no one knows anything. There are so many bogus theories out there that it is impossible to know what really happened. We will never
know what happened then, just like we will never know what really happened on 9/11. The cover up is done and the truth is buried.
In both cases, even if someone gave a press conference and gave the 100% true account of either event, it would still be dismissed as a conspiracy
theory. I would guess that someone already has told the true story on both accounts, but we will never know for sure.
It is like trying to find one specific grain of sand on the beach. It's out there, you just won't be able to find it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-4-2008 @ 06:44 AM by gmac1000
|
I heard Cardinal Spellman was in the Chapel located there at the square and over saw the whole thing...
For those who don't know who Spellman was..Treat yourself to the coruption of catholism at its best..This guy was the One that also ordered the
Veitnamese war aka"Spelly's War"
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-4-2008 @ 06:47 AM by gmac1000
|
As A Quick follow up on my laPost ...Keep in mind that most figureheads of CIA, NSA and all the 3 letter groups where devout Catholics and Jesuit
trained And to follow the man who personally reported to the Pope who personally talked to God was an Honor for these people , with No questions
asked..
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-4-2008 @ 06:58 AM by helium3
|
Originally posted by Karlhungis
I think the JFK conspiracy is the classic case of how the government can cover up any large scale conspiracy. Once people started to question the
official line, they simply start fanning the flames of conspiracy by dumping all kinds of false leads, bogus info and new theory after new theory.
Combine that with public ridicule of the people questioning it and viola, here we are.
Decades later, no one knows anything. There are so many bogus theories out there that it is impossible to know what really happened. We will never
know what happened then, just like we will never know what really happened on 9/11. The cover up is done and the truth is buried.
In both cases, even if someone gave a press conference and gave the 100% true account of either event, it would still be dismissed as a conspiracy
theory. I would guess that someone already has told the true story on both accounts, but we will never know for sure.
It is like trying to find one specific grain of sand on the beach. It's out there, you just won't be able to find it. 
So we should all just quit now....
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-4-2008 @ 07:16 AM by Karlhungis
|
reply to post by helium3
It is an act of frustration to hope for any sort of resolution or closure to these issues. I guess it depends on if you are after closure or not. If
you are just in it for the discussion with no real desire for resolution, then there is no reason to stop.
Do you honestly think that we will ever know what happened?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-4-2008 @ 07:29 AM by hinky
|
I have tossed this one around for years. I thought LBJ was involved, he absolutely hated the Kennedy Clan. I thought Nixon was involved, still have
some thoughts about this one. Always a Cuba factor as Fidel had a hard*n against Kennedy after the failed Bay of Pigs invasion. Then there are other
groups i.e. mafia - to get back at Bobby, agencies i.e. CIA even the DoD, and nations. There was no shortage of people who wanted JFK dead and all had
reasons.
This is were all the conspiracies come into play. So many players, so many agendas to choose from.
People just have a hard time realizing that one individual can make a historic change. There is no debate here, it's just a matter of accepting the
real facts, not made up or even revisionist history.
Anything I say to those who want to believe otherwise will be debunked with fake or misleading "facts".
All I can really tell you is read a real history book. Not some paperback book put out by someone wanting to make a buck on the conspiracy of the
month club. A real history book will tell you everything you want know.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-4-2008 @ 07:42 PM by helium3
|
Originally posted by Karlhungis
reply to post by helium3
It is an act of frustration to hope for any sort of resolution or closure to these issues. I guess it depends on if you are after closure or not. If
you are just in it for the discussion with no real desire for resolution, then there is no reason to stop.
Do you honestly think that we will ever know what happened? 
Theres no way in hell the government will officially admit to what really happened in Delly Plaza. The older i get the know i understand 99% of what i
was told at school was BS, if you want the truth you have to find it for yourself.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-4-2008 @ 08:17 PM by Wally Conley
|
I think it was a working combination of both the anti-Castro Cubans and the Mafia, with an assist in the form of a coverup from the Federal government
who didn't want it's connections to either to be exposed to not only the U.S. Public, but to the world at large. Not that other countries,
particularly the Soviet Union, China, and Cuba, didn't already know about it. It was just that we didn't want them to know which anti-Castro Cubans
or Mafioso we were working with to help get rid of Castro. This is my opinion anyway. And other people can disagree with my opinion as long as they
aren't disagreeable about how they disagree with it. I think Oswald was a part of the conspiracy, though, with the mafia and anti-Castro-Cubans using
him as a patsy just to throw everybody off of their trail.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-4-2008 @ 08:58 PM by CA_Orot
|
I can't say for sure any names (I haven't looked too deep into it)...but I definitely think that Lee Harvey Oswald went down as the Patsy...poor
guy...I don't believe for one second, that he shot Kennedy.
I think it was an inside job for sure...Maybe Kennedy was turning out to be too good of a president, too smart, maybe he had such great potential that
could expose the kind of dishonest people in the Government...Maybe he p*ssed off the wrong person...The Federal Reserve definitely raises some
suspicions...and as was stated earlier Skull and Bones could have definitiely been involved....
One day, maybe we'll know the truth...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-4-2008 @ 09:19 PM by mrwupy
|
Talk about an age old question. Still, I guess I should play along, in the interest of conversation mind you.
I think Jackie did it. She finally got tired of that philandering bastard humiliating her in public and making a disgrace of the whole family and she
busted a cap on his creepy ass.
SHE COULDN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE!!!!!!
She set it all up, even having her good friend Zepruder film it from the wayside. She was the inspiration for Helen Reddy's song, "I am woman, hear
me roar!"
She got her revenge, Then scooted of to a private island with Onassis.
"Hell hath no fury like the wrath of a woman scorned." (Forget the author of that)
Thats where I'll place my bets. Jackie did it.
If I'm wrong, she should have done it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-4-2008 @ 06:12 AM by St Udio
|
the reason JFK was eliminated was because of Executive Order 11110
see: www.freerepublic.com...
all the other reasons were pumped up so as to cause plausable confusion,
Oswald and others were there in Dallas, and others were waiting in the wings for another time/another place to eventually commit the deed
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-4-2008 @ 04:46 PM by salparadise
|
reply to post by hinky
[
in regards to the cuba aspect i recently read a biogrcheck aphy of che guevara an in it it the author mentions that che was considered as some one
that was involved officialynfor qite some time also it went on to sayepoirt that some people reported seeing che with jack ruby in south america cant
remember exactly were off the top of my head will check the book and try to give more details honestly though i realy do doubt this just think its
intersting
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |