It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Depopulation Theories - Why?

page: 3
<< 1  2   >>

log in


posted on Feb, 7 2009 @ 08:09 AM

911 was the first step to get control over civil rights.
the destabilization of the markets will be the next step.(of course EXXON benefits)
this is the base for ´them´to blow up the power of the FED.(which should be removed completely instead)
the next step will be creating further war conflicts for profits.

Written in April 2008. Rather prophetic, don't you think? Impressive anti72. I would't have believed it then, but I sure believe it now.

[edit on 7-2-2009 by sweetpeanc]

posted on Feb, 7 2009 @ 08:40 AM
Same communist, Propogation and splitting of the american people. Thats the simplist way i would put it

posted on Jan, 24 2010 @ 05:21 AM
Common, don't you know about the ultimate weapon? They can kill an entire country in five minutes. Did you forget about the EM waves? The brain runs at 5 to 10 kilohertz. They just point to a region and give everyone a brain hemorrage. Of course they don't want to hurt wild animals, so they will be selective. And it will take time. So example: kill an entire city in five minutes. Then have security come in and secure entrances to the city. City is under quarantine. That is the major depopulizer. Before that of course, they use other methods. They will do it in layers. Kill and then have people clean the environment, or they could have some environments cleaned by time. For instance perhaps choose an island like Java. Kill all. Ban entrance to the island. Import wild animals and then let the island be for 20 years. After 20 years in a tropical environment, most of it will turn back to jungle. The only question I have is which small community will they not kill? I am thinking Australia might be safer. They will probably allow certain small communities in every region to live.

posted on Jan, 24 2010 @ 05:36 AM
Oh why, you want to know why? Simple: It's called paradigm shift. After the shift, is a society with people who don’t age and cancer won’t exist. There will be no need for money in this society, the air will be clean and new technologies will be for everyone. There will be no need for a military etc. Unfortunately, almost seven billion people won’t be making the shift. There is no way the same seven billion people can live on the earth for thousands of years and not die, and then add there descendants. Sorry!!!, no can do

posted on Jan, 24 2010 @ 09:29 AM

Originally posted by daddyroo45
From what I've read,depopulation will be started by making the food raised with no nutritional value.Starve to death with your stomach full.
People need to collect all the heirloom seed stock they can.These seeds are not hybridized and seed can be saved and replanted.
I have no doubt that there is "something in the wind" They want us dead alright.
Or they could somehow see to it that large populations are destroyed in natural disasters like the tsunami of Indonesia, hurricane Katrina, and now Haiti. huh? maybe?

posted on Oct, 9 2010 @ 01:25 AM
I really get so sick and tired of hearing about these "depopulation agendas". Seriously, these are just signs of severe incompetence, ignorance, narrow-sightedness, and deranged mental faculties of those in power (I prefer the term, "cerebral insufficients", or those who don't know how to formulate any other solution to handle social problems appropriately. That's why. Here is a powerful article to debunk this nonsense, in a hope of actually providing a realistic, implementable, humane alternative by not having resort to kill billions of people:

Additionally, here is a parody of the Georgia Guidestones:

posted on Jan, 27 2011 @ 08:55 AM
The real danger regarding the depopulation idea is not from governments or military industrial complex or even some imaginary cabal secret society that is supposedly controlling the world behind closed doors.

The real danger is from lay people who who are, disturbingly, in favour of these ideas but have no understanding of the underlying issues. All it will take is one nut job with the capability to engineer and release a deadly, contagious disease. I read someone on another forum once suggest we need to "get over this outdated religious idea that its unacceptable to cull human populations". Just take a minute to think about the idea of the government running a lottery to select the 1 in 10 people who are to be spared compulsory Euthanasia and you will see how ridiculous the idea is.

Dr Eric Pianka was investigated by Homeland Security and the FBI following his comments about eliminating 90% of the population with airborne ebola. Would Pianka release a deadly disease on purpose? Probably not. Given the means, would a schizophrenic misanthrope or a religious extremist?

95% of the stuff that is manufactured in the world goes to waste within a year (how often do you replace your phone or computer?). If we used the world's resources more sustainably to first and foremost look after the basic needs of every human being on the planet (nutritious food, comfortable accommodation, education and healthcare) instead of churning out useless consumer junk to anaesthetize people who hate their jobs and are constantly stressed about finances (see the inherent irony?), we could probably support 12 billion.

We already have the technology that we don't have to burn fossil fuels for anything and could produce electricity so cheap it wouldn't be worth charging for it. The only problem is oil companies hold most of the patents and turkeys don't vote for christmas.

top topics

<< 1  2   >>

log in