Alien artifacts on the moon - six Apollo images

Hi, and thank you very much for taking a look on the images.

Regarding the third image, the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal has written transcripts of what the astronauts did on the moon. If you go to this website (I provided a link in my first comment in the thread), NASA describes this image as astronaut Gene Cernan examining a sample found on the moons surface. So it certainly can't be an object the astronauts had with them from earth.

I my first post I have also given the different ID numbers to the images, so you can go to NASA's website and look up the different images and the written transcripts that NASA has made public.

Best regards. Ziggystar60.

Interesting pics there, I don't know what to really make of them. I guess it's up to each observer to find in them more or less substance for something extraordinary. Keep on bringing them

Well, they kinda look like rocks to me, Im talking about the ones in the op. Personaly I think the op is jumping at nothing - no disrespect inteded.

-fm

Hi ziggy, nice pics! The first one looked pretty interesting so I hauled it through a few filters and this is what emerged...

Your pic..



And now the filtered versions...





You can see that it doesn't resemble a cog. As ArMaP had brought out, I tend to agree with him that it may be just a play of light and shadow!

The second pic you posted was interesting as also the last but one where the stone seems to have been cut!

Keep looking. There's more where where they came from!!

Cheers!



[edit on 3-4-2008 by mikesingh]

reply to post by mikesingh

---

Thank you so much for taking a look at these Apollo images! I value your opinion, and appreciate you taking time to post your own version of the first image in my thread. It is also relief that you didn't just label me a "lunatic".

And yes, I know that there are a lot more where they came from.
I have downloaded many Apollo images which shows very strange things indeed.

Best regards, Ziggystar60.

Thanks for your comment. I respect that you see only rocks, and I also wanted to thank you for giving me your opinion without being a total bastard about it.

Best regards, Ziggystar60.

It's not enough to perceive something strange. We all do that all the time, especially in unfamiliar environments.

There has to be no reasonable alternative to the anomalous interpretation. This takes careful scientific work, not just "lookit here!"

Hi, and thanks for your comment. But as far as I know, these Apollo images have not been posted here at ATS before, so I thought it would be good to share them with you people. And I actually did it for just the reason you mention - perhaps to get some scientific interpretation of them. And to get that kind of interpretation, you first have to make people aware of the images and get them to take a look at them, don't you?

I am really interested in what these features could be, and I welcome any explanation for them that makes sense. In my other thread, a poster who said she/he was a geologist posted a comment, and I contacted this person to get him/her to enlighten me in a more scientific way why the features can't be anything else than just rocks. I haven't heard from the poster again. Ah well, at least I tried.

Best regards, Ziggystar60.

What you are seeing is why we went to the moon in the first place. The U.S.A. hasent left the moon since the Apollo missions. Of course all twelve
Astronauts Have returned. What you need to ask yourselves is Why Havent we been back to the moon? Meanning N.A.S.A., of course others have been there and back. If you wish to know more please feel free to contact me. There is so much more to tell you.


my email address is:fahja777@yahoo.com
my cell number is 513) 833-5574

I think that this one slipped past the filters at NASA. Thats an image I have never seen before, not even in books or journals with other anomalies in.

Great thread, nice to see your plugging away and adding to it. Flagged because I really thing if nothing else that this one image is worth peoples attention..

reply to post by Dan Tanna

---

Just want to thank you so much for the comment. I actually have this particular image as my screensaver! I think it is reveiling. In my opinion.

reply to post by ziggystar60

---

Agree 100%.

That looks artificial to me. But who in Gods name could of made it and left it on the moon ?

reply to post by Dan Tanna

---

Excacly my point - WHO left these strange things on the moon? The more I study the images from the moon, the more certain I am that there must have been intelligent life there at some point. NASA has known about this for a long time now, and I think it is time they told the truth. The world is ready for it now.

My speculation: old-timey teleportation device.

Just throwing it out there: 1800's? Manipulation of gravity, somehow, and energy, maybe? I dunno. But given that everything is made out of rock, I can't assume anything traveling through space is going to lug around stone machinery. I can, however, see some dandy scientist in the early 1800's thinking stone is the way to go for something meant to teleport him to the moon.

Once there, it falls apart, and he dies instantly cause it's the moon for god's sakes!!

This is obviously entirely speculation, and by my wild speculation I in no way mean to discredit or distract from your finds. Just suggesting it may be terrestrial in origin after all.

What I find interesting about threads such as this is, why would NASA or any other agencies for that matter, spend literally millions of dollars...and travel millions of miles (i.e. Mars, Moon ect...) just to photograph plain old rocks.

I would imagine a mission briefing would go something like this:




I have to wonder...why so many pictures are taken of ordinary rocks or natural formations...doesn't add up. There probably is a good reason for each and every photo...whether it be just anomalous geographical features...or actual artifacts..guess only NASA knows for sure...keep looking.

[edit on 6/16/2008 by 1nL1ghtened]

reply to post by 1nL1ghtened

---

Thanks! I thought this thread was dead and forgotten. This was one of my first threads, and I guess I didn't present my finds and ideas very well, but hopefully I will learn with time. Anyway, it's nice to see that you showed interest in the images. , As you know, I believe that the astronauts found proof of intelligent life on the moon. I don't think they went there several times just to study rocks and dust.

And when you read the transcripts from the Apollo missions, it is remarkable how excited the astronauts seemed to get from time to time over plain old "rocks".

I would like to protest in the name of all rocks.

Rocks are interesting, and even a dead-looking landscape like the ones we can see on the Moon are interesting, but I agree that not all people find them interesting.

It's the same with all other things, I don't understand how someone can spend so much time looking at a baseball game, but I know that there are many people that consider it a time well spent (when their team wins).

So, if I could afford some millions of dollars (or euros) to study just Moon rocks I would consider it a well spent money (but it would have to be a more in-depth study than those already made by all the Moon missions).

That is one of the reasons I do not consider that saying "I see only rocks" is not the same as saying that there is nothing interesting in a photo, it only means that what I find interesting is different from what most people find interesting.

Marks from the bull dozer's.
Anyone come up with that one.
Perhaps they were on human ground moved into a studio.
I don't want to mess with your mind but they might have
messed with ours first.