Originally posted by mystiq
The findings that connected alien contact or abduction memories with people more prone to fantasy thought is extremely questionable.
First of
all, thanks for your reply. Can you please explain the questionable elements of these studies. And please be specific about which study your are
referring too, as i have linked at least three, i have also linked other Alien Abduction sites that address this issue and they have there own
studies. Have you read all three studies?
Did they first study a large random sample of the public, i.e.. thousands, to determine how they thought and then spend years taking in the
random experiences of these individuals?
Ok, so now it is clear you have not read the studies you have already deemed questionable! And by
the way, these studies are not about random experiences, they are about specific experiences, specific claims of alien abduction and contact. So your
point on random experiences has nothing to do with the study, as random experiences could mean anything. Read the studies, one concentrates on a small
group, the other are referencing more numbers, Susan Clancy has selected a large cross section. It should also interest you that the estimations of
incidence(
estimated to be millions of people in the USA alone) was based on small group studies, Like Roper.....so there are many questionable
elements to these numbers and estimations. If you are inferring that we need a massive cross section to study, then we also need to re-evaluate the
estimations of people experiencing AAEC, which would totally remove these estimates from the arguments put forth by those who believe in ET and use
these estimates of millions of Alien Abductions to support their beliefs. Somehow i doubt many people who believe in ET find these estimates
questionable, as they support there beliefs.
For some reason I don't believe that is how the study was performed.
Please explain the "some reason" as it would be great to
discuss these studies and these topics with a more solid frame of reference other than "some reason". Once again, the study is of the Alien
Abduction Experience, In the vast majority of these experiences the only information is sourced from the person claiming to have had the experience,
that person attributes that experience to aliens, these studies are looking at the experience and what other possible explanations there may be,
especially as there are no "aliens" or any other evidence of aliens to directly attribute these experiences too. If you have a better way of
conducting it would make the thread better if you would share it.
If it was done after the experiences occurred then how fantasy prone the persons thinking became could not be ruled out as being directly
related to unusual events (i.e.. actual alien abduction) occurring and transforming the way they thought. Experiences do actually change us.
Let me address your first question. Of course the study was done after the experiences. If we could witness the abductions we would not be here
discussing alternative explanations as there would be overwhelming evidence that aliens were abducting these people, at the moment we do not have this
evidence and so must wait for the personal testimonies of those who believe they have had an experience. I find your first comment slightly
ridiculous, and poorly thought out. Your second comment is exactly what this study finds, that those prone to fantastical thinking are more likely to
claim alien abduction, it is not that because they believe in alien abduction, they are fantasy prone. At least two of the studies looks at
psychologically profiling individuals, when a pattern emerged that the vast majority of those claiming to have AAEC fell into a specific group this
was considered significant and a possible cause. This is generally how most studies or research is done. While it has flaws, and without any other
solid evidence of aliens abducting people other than personal testimony, it is all we have.
As for myself, with regards to the numerous sightings our family has had, and an actual sighting of a grey as a child, before I'd ever
encountered any idea like that in any form of media (in fact, only recently with pictures of greys on the internet did I confirm what I had seen).
And a memory. In the end, nothing has changed my spiritual beliefs, I've had them since my preteen years, after reading scripture and thinking
things out. In time my more traditional Christian beliefs turned into a blend of that and Gnostic thought. I'm really not interested in a static
religion where everything that we ever need to know is contained in an ancient manuscript with norms and dictates that don't comply with the
situations of modern people.
Thank you for sharing your personal experiences and feelings. Your story is similar to many others i have encountered, as I am sure others have shared
similar stories to you. When you say sightings, are you referring to UFO. As UFO stands for Unidentified Flying Objects. Not Unidentified Flying
Objects that have Aliens in them that we observe abducting people. Sorry if this sounds a bit condescending, but there is a huge leap of faith in
between seeing a UFO and believing in what is controlling it, and then another leap in attributing AAE to these same UFO. There those words again,
Belief and Faith.
So while I still like certain parts of the new testament, I am new age, Gnostic and on a personal journey of discovery.
All the best to
you, and i hope your journey is a fulfilling one.
This is just me, not related to any experiences or memories. How can an abduction dictate a faith? Et is a corporal being, and therefore
isn't a spiritual authority at all!
I believe you should look further into the Alien Abduction Experience. Look over the firsts two pages of
this thread for starters. There are many, many links that highlight the spiritual aspects of these experiences and the resemblance to more traditional
religious and spiritual phenomena.
When you say ET is a corporal being, why do we not have people with AAEc showing us any other evidence to support this?, why do the vast majority of
AAEc occur without any UFO activity? Why do more and more mediums now claim to have contact with a superior alien race, where as traditionally they
were spirits?
People experience spiritual changes after having these experiences, many contactees claim that they have a mission, or message to spread. The list
goes on, and on. The fact that there is no definitive proof of ET to attribute these experiences to places these ET's along side the likes of God,
Spirits, demons, Angels......people believe that these also, based on a personal experiences and/or contact.....and as we have no definitive proof
that they exist we call a belief in these a faith, religion.....can you not see the similarities. What about the groups that have grown purely on the
claims of a persons Alien Influence or Contact experiences, Scientology, Raelism, Aetherius Society, Heavens Gate, Unarius, Galactic federation. This
is exactly how religions grow. All these have traits that promise the redemption or salvation of humanity or the individual via alien intervention or
influence, but with no aliens to show, requiring a belief based on faith in an experience, now if you replace the word alien, with God, or A spirit,
or an Angel.....you'd call that what? Religion. These are just a few examples of the religious nature and characteristics that we observe in relation
to Alien abduction and contatee experiences.
Though I'm delighted to discover the more positive human types, I still don't allow my faith to be dictated in any capacity.
That is great. I am happy for you.
Thank you once again for contributing to the thread, and for sharing your own experiences and feelings.
Cheers.
[edit on 21-8-2008 by atlasastro]