How old is civilization?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 12:36 PM by Nohup
Originally posted by BroonStone
Does anyone have any insight as to any older civ.?
I would appriciate any feedback on this subject you can provide!


That would probably be the Shoosh.

dooroodiran.blogspot.com...

There may have been some slightly older cultures that existed but didn't leave behind many artifacts because they may have constructed their houses out of dirt or wood or animal hides, so nothing much would be left of them. Archeologists are always digging around trying to find them.

Otherwise, there are some theories about an earlier, relatively advanced civilization existing 12,000 to 14,000 years ago, coinciding with the rapid end of the last Ice Age. But the evidence is scant and circumstantial. This civilization was supposed to be interested in widespread seafaring and trading, astronomy/astrology, and was the first to define laws and lay the foundations for large stone monuments in various parts of the world.

That's a lot for a culture to do and not leave behind much of anything in the form of good evidence. But it was a really long time ago, and there may have been some major catastrophes like large regional floods and asteroid strikes that might have destroyed a lot of the available evidence.

www.robertbauval.co.uk...
www.grahamhancock.com...

Small fragments of strange out of place objects have also been found at odd layers supposedly millions of years old. But these vastly pre-date when humans are agreed to have evolved, and some of them might be natural objects that only appear to be manufactured artifacts.

www.mcremo.com...


reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 03:12 PM by Harte
Originally posted by Nohup

That would probably be the Shoosh.

dooroodiran.blogspot.com...

There may have been some slightly older cultures that existed but didn't leave behind many artifacts because they may have constructed their houses out of dirt or wood or animal hides, so nothing much would be left of them. Archeologists are always digging around trying to find them.

Nohup,

The usual definition of civilization cannot be applied in the case of the Susa because they had no writing, as far as we know.

Your linked site says:
By civilization, we mean civilized city government or city state or Empire or Kingdom or any type of local civilized system.


Most anthropologists require quite a bit more from a culture than this before they can classify it as a civilization.
I sort of like a combination of these:

In 1936, the archeologist V. Gordon Childe published his book Man Makes Himself. Childe identified several elements which he believed were essential for a civilization to exist. He included: the plow, wheeled cart and draft animals, sailing ships, the smelting of copper and bronze, a solar calendar, writing, standards of measurement, irrigation ditches, specialized craftsmen, urban centers and a surplus of food necessary to support non-agricultural workers who lived within the walls of the city. Childe's list concerns human achievements and pays less attention to human organization.

Another historian agreed with Childe but added that a true definition of civilization should also include money collected through taxes, a privileged ruling class, a centralized government and a national religious or priestly class. Such a list, unlike Childe's, highlights human organization. In 1955, Clyde Kluckhohn argued that there were three essential criteria for civilization: towns containing more than 5000 people, writing, and monumental ceremonial centers. Finally, the archeologist and anthropologist Robert M. Adams argued for a definition of civilization as a society with functionally interrelated sets of social institutions: class stratification based on the ownership and control of production, political and religious hierarchies complementing each other in the central administration of territorially organized states and lastly, a complex division of labor, with skilled workers, soldiers and officials existing alongside the great mass of peasant producers.

Source

Agreement must be reached on the definition before one can argue for or against a "lost civilization," right?

Funny how that criterion is rarely met here at ATS. Makes me wonder sometimes if people arguing about lost civilizations realize that their opinions may not be all that different, just their definitions!

Anyway, if you like really old artifacts for "proof" of civilization, you could do worse than to consider the Jomon. As far as we can tell, they invented pottery. Read the following and be astonished:

It has long been known that the Jomon pottery of Japan goes back a very long way. (Jomon means Twisted cord, so this is the pottery made with twisted cord decoration.)

Recently however pottery has been found that dates back to 13,000 years ago, which, if you use the latest radiocarbon calibration, gives a date of 16,000 years ago. (or 14,000 BC).

Source

Holy crap - middle of the end of the last Ice Age!

Harte

[edit on 3/28/2008 by Harte]



reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 03:43 PM by Harte
reply to post by gingern



Run a search on the Piri Reis map right here at ATS to see why you're wrong.

Harte


reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 04:02 PM by gingern
reply to post by Harte



I'm not going to lie. I have looked at some of the stuff on ATS as you suggested.

However I still believe, and so do some of people who have posted on said forums, that this map throws up more questions than answers.

It's not just this map that that makes me think there is a missing time period.

I believe, just for starters, that the Indus valley holds secrets as well.


reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 04:24 PM by cormac mac airt
reply to post by BroonStone





As far as I can find the oldest know settlements were found in the middle East and date to around 8000 B.C. This area is associated with the first agriculture as well. Also around the same time 7000 B.C. the first agriculture was being developed in India and around 6500 B.C. the Chinese were starting to farm as well.
Does anyone have any insight as to any older civ.?


BroonStone,

Here are several settled areas that may be of interest to you. Each has an interesting story of its own.


Tel Aby Hureyra, Syria
Pulli Settlement, Sindi, Estonia
Gobekli Tepe, Turkey
Jericho - Pre- Pottery Neolithic A
Deepcar, England
Catal Huyuk, Turkey
Ain Ghazal, Jordan
Cayonu, Turkey
Jhusi, India
Mehrgarg, Pakistan
Jiahu, China
Tel Megiddo, Israel
Susa, Iran
Knossos, Crete
Lepenski Vir, Serbia
Atlit Yam, Israel
Yesilova Hoyuk, Turkey
Tell Halaf, Syria
Vinca Culture, Serbia
Sialk, Iran
Sesklo, Greece


reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 10:40 PM by Tenebrous
Other than small villages of hunter-gatherers/farmers, the first known large scale town with permanent residents is Jericho, which being inhabitance in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic (8500-7300 B.C)

The earliest civilization by archaeological standards was the city states of Sumer, in lower Mesopotamia, modern Iraq. These people are considered to have the first form of writing (c. 3400 B.C. 200 years before the earliest in Egypt and many think is was trade is Sumer that got the Egyptians thinking about writing) They also invent the wheel and the plow.

Someone mention the Indus valley as a potential for this. Well very little is known of its early civilization, the Harappans, mainly due to no surviving records, and the inability to decipher what little is left of their language, such as on walls palaces and other large structures. This is made more difficult as unlike the Egyptians, they did not write very much. What little is left is likely to be names of people or locations, or other short nouns, which are near impossible to decipher. We are still waiting for the "Rosetta Stone" for the Harrapans. (Interestingly enough, this may be found in Bahrain of all places, due to this being a nexus of trade between Harrapa and the city states of Mesopotamia, and if we can find something with matching writing in both languages there, it would be the key). The one thing that is not seriously debated is age. Although there were large villages in late 4th and early third centuries B.C. found there, general consensus is that mature Harrapan civilization was c. 2500-2050 BC after which they basically ceased to exist. This is the earliest known Indus valley civilization.

Now, this was all taken from my university textbook, so don't go all crazy asking for sources, I'm not pulling this out of thin air tho .

Complex chiefdoms, like those of the Great Lakes, or the Pacific islands can get incredibly advanced and complex. There is no doubt many of these existed back then. Due to there very nature however, they leave very little evidence, as most of what they worked with, produced and lived in was bio-degradable.



reply posted on 6-4-2008 @ 07:49 AM by St Udio
Originally posted by BroonStone
As far as I can find the oldest know settlements were found in the middle East and date to around 8000 B.C. ...

Does anyone have any insight as to any older civ.?



google up the cave paintings, France has several famous ones,

whatever civilization made the cave art, they met the definition of civilization some 30,000 years ago.


see:
education.yahoo.com...

NOUN:

1. An advanced state of intellectual, cultural and material development in human society, marked by progress in the arts and sciences, and extensive use of record-keeping, including writing,
and the appearance of complex political and social institutions.



the pre-historic cave art, was also meant as a type of record keeping, and a sort of naturalists list of migrating herd animals...
the specialization of people allowed for artists to record the world around them, and not be primarily concerned for food or safety... now that sounds like civilization to me.

of course the academics will say the cave painters of some 30,000 years ago were only a part of a Culture,
such as a clovis culture, a neo-lithic culture, but surely not a Neanderthal culture.


reply posted on 6-4-2008 @ 11:21 AM by Astyanax
reply to post by grover

The historian Felipe Fernandez Armesto in his book "Civilizations: Culture, Ambition and the Transformation of Nature" defines civilization in terms of...

Oh, there are plenty of definitions of civilization. At the end of the day, most of them boil down to 'civilized is what I am'.

However, the word is derived from the Latin civis, i.e. 'citizen'; the same root, via the Latin civitas (a derivation, according to my Shorter Oxford Dictionary), gives us 'city'.

The earliest meaning of 'civilization' (early 18th century) was 'the assimilation of common law to civil law', which rather suits my definition, don't you think?
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 7 days ago with 96 member flags
12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 4 days ago with 81 member flags
The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 15 days ago with 70 member flags
Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags
Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 16 days ago with 29 member flags
R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 11 days ago with 21 member flags