Greetings
Originally posted by whiterabbit
I'm not a Christian, but I don't how anyone could actually doubt that there was a real historical Jesus.
Many writers and historians doubt that Jesus ever existed, here is a brief list :
C.F. Dupuis, 1791, Abrege De L'Origine Des Cultes
Robert Taylor, 1829, Diegesis
Bruno Bauer, 1841, Criticism of the Gospel History of the Synoptics
Mitchell Logan, 1842, Christian Mythology Unveiled
David Friedrich Strauss, 1860, The Life of Jesus Critically Examined
Kersey Graves, 1875, The World's Sixteen Crucified Saviours
T.W. Doane, 1882, Bible Myths and their Parallels in Other Religions
Gerald Massey, 1886, Historical Jesus and Mythical Christ
Thomas Whittaker, 1904, The Origins of Christianity
William Benjamin Smith, 1906, Der vorchristliche Jesus
Albert Kalthoff, 1907, The Rise of Christianity
M.M. Mangasarian, 1909, The Truth About Jesus ? Is He a Myth?
Arthur Drews, 1910, The Christ Myth
John M. Robertson, 1917, The Jesus Problem
Georg Brandes, 1926, Jesus – A Myth
Joseph Wheless, 1930, Forgery in Christianity
L.Gordon Rylands, 1935, Did Jesus Ever Live?
Edouard Dujardin, 1938, Ancient History of the God Jesus
P.L. Couchoud, 1939, The Creation of Christ
Alvin Boyd Kuhn, 1944, Who is this King of Glory?
Karl Kautsky, 1953, The Foundations of Christianity
Herbert Cutner, 1950, Jesus: God, Man, or Myth?
Guy Fau, 1967, Le Fable de Jesus Christ
Originally posted by whiterabbitTrue, we have almost nothing, other than the Gospels, that even mentions Jesus.
Indeed.
There is no contemporary evidence for Jesus or the Gospel events at all.
And, the Gospels are clear derived from the OT, and other literature of the day.
Originally posted by whiterabbitWhat we do have, though, is concrete evidence that the Christian movement sprang up out of nowhere in
the holy land
It did not start out of "nowhere" at all.
The origins of Christian belief can clearly be seen in :
* the Tanakh
* pagan mystery religions
* literature and writings of the time
Originally posted by whiterabbitand people promptly started getting themselves martyred for it.
Martyred?
The legends of martyrs are from long afterwards.
Just more legends supporting earlier legends.
Anyway - people die for false beliefs all the time - so what?
The Cathars died for their beliefs (against the Church's beliefs) do you think that makes the Cathars right, and the Church wrong?
No.
Muslims died for their beliefs to this day (such as suicide bombers) - do you claim that make Islam right?
No.
The Heaven's Gate cult all died for their beliefs - do you argue they were right about hitching a soul-ride on a hidden space-ship?
No.
So why claim a myth about Christian martyrs means anything?
Originally posted by whiterabbitI find it hard to believe that a movement like that, with people as dedicated as that, could form like
that and fool so many people without there at least having been an actual Jesus founding it.
Why not?
The vast majority of Christians never met Jesus anyway - they simply believed in what others told them - that proves nothing.
How could Scientology grow unless Xenu was real?
How could Hindusim succeed unless Krishna etc. were real?
How could the Greek religions succeed unless their myths were true?
Belief means nothing.
Many people believe many things about religion.
You reject all other beliefs, and accept your own - just like they do.
It proves nothing at all about Jesus.
Iasion