It seems like either information was suppressed or else there the little information there was was left intentionally ambiguous so that it
could be taken advantage.
Well, that's well supported. Earlier in this thread, one mentioned Roman records of his brother James, etc. But, to protect the divinity of Jesus'
birth, the idea of his mother and father having additional children in the normal fashion, simply didn't help to contribute to the wonder of the
tale, so he was omitted. Funny though, that in order to use these references to support the existence of Jesus, you'd then also have to acknowledge
the existence of James, hehe...
Here's an interesting thought...
Many modern magic tricks rely on a very simple concept....a twin.
Example, you put a woman in a box, and she vanishes under the stage. Then, from a box hanging high overhead, suddenly, her twin emerges! Tada!!!!
I've often wondered if Jesus and James were perhaps twins... Many of the "miracles" (aside from healing, unless they employed other twins or
tricks), could likely be done this way, even the resurrection... Intriguing idea anyhow... Wow, what power such a trick would have back then...
[edit on 11-1-2005 by Gazrok]