The Nibiru Myth, page 9

privacy

Pages: << 6 7 8 9 10 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 25 times

reply posted on 4-4-2008 @ 11:07 AM by genprinciple

Not that this is the Niburu everyone is talking about but proving there is a planet x doesn't get any more obvious than this.

science.nasa.gov...

Note the domain name.

reply posted on 4-4-2008 @ 01:11 PM by Mogget

jkrog08,

I (and several others) keep trying to tell the die hard believers that Nibiru doesn't exist, but we might as well be talking to a brick wall.

reply posted on 4-4-2008 @ 01:37 PM by jkrog08

reply to post by genprinciple

Those exo planetoids(I didnt even read the link or go to it,I know what your talking about)are not planet "x",they are simply rouge planetoids(A planetoid is a body in space that does not meet the THREE criteria that a body must meet to become classified as a planet.Yea there are several objects,some bigger than Pluto that are between Pluto and the Heliosphere(true boundry of our solar system).But they are nothing more than rouge planetoids not large enough to secure planetary orbits,but rather act more like rouge moons-which infact is what they are.They are not Nibiru or a brown dwarf.

reply posted on 4-4-2008 @ 01:42 PM by Leviatano

reply to post by genprinciple

Judged by the fact that it was back in 05 and being the fact that we lost pluto in 06 proves that really, that many scientist were frustrated more than likely at the findings. They probably just found a vast amount of planetoid bodies drifting about in there orbit or what not. Rather than add more planets and names for people to know and memorize, take one planet it and re-design the planet field. Much easier that way.

So the scientist did find Planet X, they also found planet XI and Planet XII and so on

. They just changed planet X to planetoid X!

reply posted on 4-4-2008 @ 01:55 PM by jkrog08

reply to post by Leviatano

take one planet it and re-design the planet field. Much easier that way.

Dont quite understand that comment,could you explain?????

reply posted on 4-4-2008 @ 02:00 PM by Leviatano

reply to post by jkrog08

Ment to say take one planet out and re-design the whole planet field. Sorry got side-tracked while typing that

reply posted on 6-4-2008 @ 05:38 PM by jkrog08

As a final comment from me(unless some believer challenges my knowledge on this subject

I hope I have helped lay to rest any doubt that Nibiru DOES NOT EXSIST.but Im sure I havnt.I would like to restate three(3) FACTS THAT PROVE TO .00000000001*10% THAT NIBIRU DOES NOT EXSIST.

1.If a brown dwarf star(Nibiru)was within one light year(which would far exceed where people say it is,actually if you go by believers it is less than 6AU away(****Astronomical units=the distance from Earth to the Sun)our planet would likely not be able to support life,we would have multiple intersectng orbits of Jupiter,Saturn,Uranis,Neptune...infact it is likely some planets would collide or go into the Sun.

2.You claim NASA or the PTB are hiding the truth...THEY COULD NOT!!!If a brown dwarf star was anywhere AGAIN within one lightyear(the distance it takes light to travel in ONE year) everyone would know.

3.For those of you that would claim....."well its been here before,it just has a long orbit.....)No,impossible,yes there are stars that move indepentantly through space,but NOT IN A ORBIT.....a few physics calculations will prove beyond doubt that it is not possible for a star(even a dwarf star)to maintain an excentric orbit w/o interfering with the neighboring sol. system.

***On a side note I suggest you wory about such things as............energy crisis,global warming,NWO(If its real),alien invasion(again if its real,which I belive aliens are here and do exsist.so Im not a skeptic),astroid/comet impact(this is most likely within 20 years,GRB(Gamma Ray Burst)again more likely,or makind destroying itself than a fabled Nibiru.

- JKrog

EDIT to add

SP)I know,Im just to lazy,lol............

But I forgot,someone said "precession",lol do you even know what that is?

Precession-the multi-thousand year (16-26000)"wobble"of our planet.

***This is NOT caused by a brown dwarf star...........this is caused by the fact that Earth(and other planets)are not perfect and are "missed massed" so to speak....by that I mean,that a tug due to gravity and the Earths instability cause this wobble,which builds over time........EDIT again to disuade any further arguments..this gravity tug is NOT DUE TO ANOTHER STAR,it is due to the gravity influence of Jupiter and the other Jovian planets(which ARE NEARLY BROWN DWARFS)

[edit on 4/6/2008 by jkrog08]

[edit on 4/6/2008 by jkrog08]

reply posted on 6-4-2008 @ 06:30 PM by Leviatano

Okay I must shoot some things down now.

Apparently in one C2C interview, some guy made it "clear" as to this planet X thing. What he said was that there was another star (The brown dwarf if I remember) out there and Planet X was revolving around it, which is how it keeps coming back and forth. I don't know where/how they get the information to all come together to get a picture like that, but that is what he said.

Site here.
xfacts.com...

reply posted on 6-4-2008 @ 06:57 PM by OzWeatherman

Originally posted by Leviatano
Okay I must shoot some things down now.

Apparently in one C2C interview, some guy made it "clear" as to this planet X thing. What he said was that there was another star (The brown dwarf if I remember) out there and Planet X was revolving around it, which is how it keeps coming back and forth. I don't know where/how they get the information to all come together to get a picture like that, but that is what he said.

Site here.
xfacts.com...

Oh yeah C2C, the most accurate source of information regarding planet x, lol

That just adds to more confusion. Half the PX'ers are saying that planet x is a brown dwarf and the other half are saying its revolvin around a brown dwarf. Then they post supposed photos of it, nice and bright and orange in the sky. Jokes on them though as a brown dwarf would not be bright orange in the sky even if it was (by some miracle) near earth

reply posted on 6-4-2008 @ 07:02 PM by jkrog08

Originally posted by OzWeatherman

Originally posted by Leviatano
Okay I must shoot some things down now.

Apparently in one C2C interview, some guy made it "clear" as to this planet X thing. What he said was that there was another star (The brown dwarf if I remember) out there and Planet X was revolving around it, which is how it keeps coming back and forth. I don't know where/how they get the information to all come together to get a picture like that, but that is what he said.

Site here.
xfacts.com...

Oh yeah C2C, the most accurate source of information regarding planet x, lol

That just adds to more confusion. Half the PX'ers are saying that planet x is a brown dwarf and the other half are saying its revolvin around a brown dwarf. Then they post supposed photos of it, nice and bright and orange in the sky. Jokes on them though as a brown dwarf would not be bright orange in the sky even if it was (by some miracle) near earth

Yea the only way you can vsee a brown dwarf is in the infrared spectrum of light,you cannot see it in the visable wavelengths.As far as c2c......come on?!Also IF a planet were revolving around a brown dwarf,it would not be able to sustain anylife anyways as the only form of energy it emits is infrared(well it does emit some others but not enough)So, I wouldnt worry about "planet x"...........remember Y2K???Dang,I almost forgot what happened there?

reply posted on 6-4-2008 @ 07:04 PM by Leviatano

Hey don't attack the messenger

I'm just trying to show everyone what others think about this. Since we never could get a clear understanding on whether it was a planet or a star. Not saying it's reliable just throwing it out there. So as you both can see(read) it seems this is a close case from that link, as well as the myriad of other links.

reply posted on 6-4-2008 @ 07:09 PM by OzWeatherman

Originally posted by Leviatano
Hey don't attack the messenger I'm just trying to show everyone what others think about this. Since we never could get a clear understanding on whether it was a planet or a star. Not saying it's reliable just throwing it out there. So as you both can see(read) it seems this is a close case from that link, as well as the myriad of other links.

Lol...yeah I know its not you

You know better right

There is so much conflict with the theory, and PX'ers on here keep changing their story. xnibirux once said planet x was travelling at the speed of light and was entering Jupiters orbit, then he changed it once someone calculated that planet x would reach earth sometime the following morning, pmsl

He also pressed the red foe button when I started this thread

Strange how he didnt attempt to write a reply post

reply posted on 6-4-2008 @ 07:47 PM by Leviatano

reply to post by OzWeatherman

In a way yes, But it's still fun to try and wrap your mind about what the believers believe about this planet and brown dwarf we have in our solar system.

reply posted on 16-4-2008 @ 11:51 AM by genprinciple

reply to post by Leviatano

actually from what I read they called it Xena. I would like to review your sources because until I see it from something like NASA, in my opinion, I see it as a possibility or mere speculation based on reason. I have this thing about evidence coming from chief authorities. No offense. I cant find anything to support what you said. As far as just calling them planetoids but maybe I am not googling the right words. I would love to read about what you are talking about.

reply posted on 16-4-2008 @ 11:59 AM by genprinciple

reply to post by jkrog08

Where did you get your information about exo planets or rouge moons/ planets, whatever? I would really like to read from your sources. I have not found anything to support what you posted. I have this little thing about me where I must read from a cheif authority like NASA. Since NASA and Sky and Telescope are both calling it a planet well I am going to have to side with them until proven otherwise. No offense. I am a proof it/ show me kinda guy.

reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 05:33 PM by Anonymous ATS

reply to post by ElectroMagnetic Multivers

People,
Don´t try to minimize evidences. We all know about the pre-historical animals that were found frozen so rapidly they could not even hide for safety. Inumerous ruins and ancient cities found underneath the surface of the Earth along with several ancient objects we can´t even understand what they were used for ! Something has happened in the past... something catastrophic... and several times ... great civilizations just vanished under cataclismatic events... why it should not happen again???

reply posted on 18-5-2008 @ 12:08 AM by OzWeatherman

Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
Something has happened in the past... something catastrophic... and several times ... great civilizations just vanished under cataclismatic events... why it should not happen again???

Yeah but a planet/ star?

Totally unplausible and not one bit of proper evidence to suggest otherwise

reply posted on 18-5-2008 @ 07:11 PM by OzWeatherman

I cant believ how many new Nibiru posts have just popped up out of no where

Can any of those Ops explain using astronomy, astrophysics and in general science to prove that this ridiculous theory is plausible?

I seriously doubt they can

reply posted on 18-5-2008 @ 08:13 PM by Agent Venom

Originally posted by genprinciple
Not that this is the Niburu everyone is talking about but proving there is a planet x doesn't get any more obvious than this.

science.nasa.gov...

Note the domain name.

Replying to an old post I know, but that article is about 2003 UB313, now known as Eris, the largest known dwarf planet in the solar system. Not Planet X and not Nibiru that is supposedly coming to get us in time for 2012! Seriously, Nibiru falls into the same category as fire breathing dragons, leprechauns, unicorns and the tooth fairy, all are myths.

Pages: << 6 7 8 9 10 >> ^^TOP^^