It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Noah's Flood, and several other happenings on Earth
were probably caused by the planet Mars. I agree with Donald Patten
that the orbit of Mars was different in the past.I think starting
in (?) BC until at least the 8th century BC Mars had a very
elliptical orbit. One end of its orbit was out near the orbit of the
asteroid belt and the other end of its orbit around the Sun was near
the orbit of the Earth. So I think Mars used to pass astronomically
close to the Earth periodically until as least the 8th century BC.
Originally posted by Choronzon
Which leaves you with no scientific basis for accreditation. Which means at that point you are realying on faith alone to pour a foundation for the myth.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by ElectroMagnetic Multivers
EMM, do you think that Einstein and Newton are wrong? If so, please provide YOUR evidence, your math, your proofs to allow us to conclude that you are correct, and thousands of physicists are wrong.
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
Myth- Nibiru has a highly eliptical orbit and only reaches our solar sytem every 3600 years
Fact- According to astronomers, eliptical orbits are highly unstable. Chances are that if there was a planet in such an orbit would either revert to a circular orbit as it nears the sun, or fly off somewhere into space due to the distance from the sun
Originally posted by ElectroMagnetic Multivers
reply to post by Choronzon
illogical? you are basing a theory, and arguments for it using the current model are you not? for instance, the elliptical orbit. The model is by no means complete (IMO, way off aswell) yet people base their own conjecture (which they display as fact) using these models. You all talk as if people who believe in the 'Nibiru myth' are idiots and people who live in a dream world. Does it sound logical to you, basing a counter argument, on arguments that are yet to be substantiated? my only intention is to show you how ignorant this entire post is at the moment (some of the Nibiru threads have been similar in composition).