The Nibiru Myth, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 25 times


reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 10:49 AM by ElectroMagnetic Multivers
To be honest, I believe in the Nibiru theory, that is as a planet, and not as a brown star. The things you cite as 'facts' and 'evidence' are merely conjecture on other peoples part, it is the conclusions they have drawn, how do you know we won't find that large eliptical orbits aren't possible? with the standard model of our solar system slowly fading away, as it piles on the questions it just can't answer.

Another thing, Sitchin, didn't by any means have everything locked down, some of the things he states ARE his own conclusions and thus are based on his (then) current perception of the world, this does not make him a fraud or an idiot, just human, he put to much of himself into his work. I agree with some of his theories and disagree with some of them, it isn't all gospel, he is looking for answers as much as the next person.

And now were saying people who don't go to university can in no other way be qualified for a type of field. From what I remember Einstein taught himself Physics while he worked in a patents office, so of course, Einstein must've been a fake. This is whats quickly becoming wrong with most western cultures, university is seen as to be the only way of 'advancing' oneself, there are better ways, but university is nice and convenient.

So this is me, coming out of the wood work!! There are many things out there that we have no idea about, yet people decide to refute it so not to mess up their perfect little world, Nibiru maybe complete myth, but the acceptance of the possibility can go a long way and I for one accept it.

p.s. I loved this bit on the link (regarding the Akkadian seal):

"But what you see isn't a map of the solar system at all. It's decoration, PROBABLY. OR a picture of Venus, as seen from our planet, and surrounded by stars. The ancient Babylonians made funny little drawings like this all the time. And they all looked different. So it's just coincidence this one resembles a solar system.

thanks. EMM



[edit on 28-3-2008 by ElectroMagnetic Multivers]


reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 10:52 AM by jfj123
reply to post by OzWeatherman



Good job !!!
I'm so tired of seeing thread after thread claiming that planet x is coming and are full of pro planet x'ers who don't want to see factual information but instead just want to pretend for whatever reason.

Once again good job and I really like the way you've presented it- FACT vs FICTION.

I give you 1 x 10 12th power thumbs up !



reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 11:07 AM by Mark Roazhar
reply to post by Essan



Originally posted by Essan
no reference in any source to such a planet prior to the 1970s


I think he sat down and watched the Sci-Fi movie "When Worlds Collide" (1951) which was based on a book from 1932




Nibiru fans who cant wait until 2012 may like to know that a remake of this film is currently in production and expected
Steven Spielberg has announced that he will be the executive producer of a new version of When Worlds Collide to be released sometime in 2008. The film is currently listed as being in the pre-production stages, and will be a co-production of Paramount Pictures and DreamWorks.
I have no information whether he will change the name of the planet to appease Zecariah Sitchin or if he will even get a mention

[edit on 28-3-2008 by Mark Roazhar]



reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 11:07 AM by Choronzon
Anyone new to the Nibiru Hoax scene, should really research the cult of Nancy Lieder:

en.wikipedia.org...

Nancy Lieder has been proven to be a fraud, time and time again. But the gullability train keeps on truckin as one generation falls off and the next generation of gullible minds hops on.


reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 11:18 AM by ElectroMagnetic Multivers
reply to post by branestorm




'Logic' minded people like to apply the current perception of reality to the past and future, they don't admit changes could happen, because they don't want change to happen, it coud make them...dare i say it....wrong?

I'm not condoning people who start threads like 'ULTIMATE NIBIRU FACTS' because it just perpetuates a bad cycle, but a thread like this just does the same thing, but the direct opposite. I use logic, but within the environment of creativity, it is how i choose to 'progress', I accept any and every possibility and deduct my perception from there. Why can't our solar system have a captured planet? why haven't we been visited by an ET race in the past or present? absence of evidence, is not evidence of absence. We find things from ancient times all the time that we have no idea what they are, or what they do. We try and fit them in to what we percieve about a time millenia ago, its pottery or an abstract musical instrument (to name a few).

You don't have t believe in it, just believe in the possibility of it.

thanks. EMM


reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 11:25 AM by weedwhacker
reply to post by diablomonic



diablomonic, While I understand your point, that ALL orbits are ellipses, what was attemped to point out by the OP was that an EXTREMELY erratic ellipse would likely not be stable over geological time periods.

AND....if this is a supposedly 'stable' 3,600-year orbit, then why has our Solar System remained so relativly stable for...oh, 4 billion years???

See, if this 'interloper' actually existed for all this time the orbits of the planets would eventually be affected. In fact, we probably wouldn't even have evolved, since the Earth would have been affected as well......

Best, Tim/WW


reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 11:33 AM by ElectroMagnetic Multivers
reply to post by weedwhacker



We know nothing of our solar system, galax or universe. We're not sure how they work or how they interact with each other, yet you state this so matter of factly as evidence against Nibiru, the facts with which you 'nail this theory to that wall' so to speak are no more credible than the facts that keep it a float. Why must we continue to prove other people wrong to bolster our own theories?

EMM



reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 11:46 AM by weedwhacker
reply to post by ElectroMagnetic Multivers



EMM, do you think that Einstein and Newton are wrong? If so, please provide YOUR evidence, your math, your proofs to allow us to conclude that you are correct, and thousands of physicists are wrong.

Thanks!
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 68 replies