Originally posted by Badge01
I started looking at it from a 'Systems Management' point of view.
They really need to hire you at NASA.
Originally posted by Badge01
That includes use of nanotechnology (very small scout ships, but unmanned), and virtual technology (visiting in 'active' hologram form).
Both of these are extremely viable possibilities. Here's why I think so:
1) Nanotechnology - As humans are beginning to discover (regarding space applications) smaller can be better. There are plans in the works to deploy
a satellite array (I prefer 'swarm', but that's not what NASA calls it) that will orbit in formation. Each small unit makes up a part of the
larger whole. Using interfereometry, these small units will combine to form an enormous telescope. Now, while this isn't exactly Nano-tech, it's
certainly taking into consideration the fact that several small devices costs much less to launch, and much less to maintain. If we're talking about
civilizations with perhaps a 1000 year edge on us or greater, I find it highly likely that this concept would eventually reach the Nano level. A
swarm of microscopic nano explorer robots could even concievably hitch a ride on a comet or asteroid. And something that small could make great use
of the force of 'solar winds'.
2) The Hologram theory -
First, let me be clear, I'm not saying that I think crop circles are the result of EBE activity. I'm not saying that some aren't either, I simply
don't know because I haven't researched them enough. Having said this, it occurs to me that using microwaves (or something similar) to actively
'beam' a message/communication to the surface of another world makes a whole heck of a lot of sense in this context. For reference on the
possibilities of Microwaves, I'll reference the HAARP facility in Alaska. There is a lot of speculation about the facility, but one thing is for
certain, they are using microwaves there, and they have the capability of crossing microwave beams (focused) to 'heat up' layers of the Ionosphere.
Further, they are exploiting the physics of their local environment to generate electricity. At any rate, my point is that if Humans can do that,
imagine what an advanced species might be capable of doing.
It certainly makes sense from a systems management point of view, to save on cost (I'm really talking about energy requirements as opposed to money,
but as they are equivalent in our society I guess there isn't a distinction required).
Originally posted by Badge01
4. On arrival in interstellar ships, atmospheric-capable craft must be deployed to allow night flight and visitation;
I completely agree on this point, but am contradicted by personal experience. I know that this is just a personal testimony I'm about to make, and
that I can't 'prove it' to you or anyone else, but I'm going to say it anyway.
Last fall in Los Angeles I saw what I can only describe as a 'mothership' in the sky over downtown headed West. It looked like a flying Oil
Platform.
Now I know nobody is going to just 'believe' me, and I don't expect anyone to really, but since we're talking about this stuff in depth here, I
thought it worth mentioning since it's absolutely the truth as I witnessed it, and it seems relevant to this discussion.
I guess my point is that while atmospheric craft makes sense to me (and if I were planning such a mission, I'd recommend it) it might not be a
requirement for a sufficiently advanced species. They might have ships that can travel equally well in both space and atmo.
I think that a lot of it (they manner in which a species chooses to visit a new world like Earth) will depend upon the amount of energy available and
disposable to that species...
Other than wanting to speculate with you a bit further on these points, your post makes perfect sense to me. I've also spent many years thinking
about these issues, and it has been a sincere pleasure speculating on the possibilities in such a rational way with you and others here at ATS.
What a great way to start the morning!
-WFA