Clinton backers warn Pelosi on superdelegate rift , page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 27-3-2008 @ 08:27 PM by seagull
reply to post by jsobecky




It's not a foolish notion to want to know what religion some one is, who is running for high office. It gives a voter at least a glimpse of what their core belief system is. It doesn't mean they're good or bad, but it is what makes them, or at least helps, who and what they are.

Did that make sense?


reply posted on 27-3-2008 @ 08:44 PM by Shar
kosmicjack,



She is so going nuclear



Yes, that is exactly what this reporter said at the end of this news.


www.msnbc.msn.com...








Personally, I'm shocked that it came down to these two people!! If our elections were all held at the same time we wouldn't have this problem.

Why cant we hold an election to at least narrow it down to 2 people and then go from there. Instead of a few states chosing and the rest drop out. I think it's crazy they way they do it.

[edit on 27-3-2008 by Shar]



reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 06:20 AM by jsobecky
reply to post by seagull



Originally posted by seagull
reply to post by jsobecky




It's not a foolish notion to want to know what religion some one is, who is running for high office. It gives a voter at least a glimpse of what their core belief system is. It doesn't mean they're good or bad, but it is what makes them, or at least helps, who and what they are.

Did that make sense?

No, there's nothing wrong with that, in the interest of vetting a candidate. Religion could make a difference in a person's approach to national defense, for instance.

What I'm talking about are people who won't vote for anyone who has a different religion than they do.


reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 12:18 PM by seagull
reply to post by jsobecky



True enough, Jso, true enough. I suppose since I don't use religion as a basis for voting for or even against. I automatically, or almost automatically, think that most others don't either. I suppose I'm wrong in assuming that. Assumptions'll get you every time, .
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 113 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 12 hours ago, 65 replies
I saw a cat turn into a bag..
  The Gray Area, Posted 16 hours ago, 42 replies