reply to post by Locoman8
friend, respect is recieved and is reciprical. And so, I respectfully disagree.
II Eucharistic Communion
The fact that there is only one unequivocal usage of koinonia that refers to the eucharist should not make us think it is unimportant, or a late
development The First Letter to the Corinthians was probably written in its present form before all the other texts quoted above (AD 55). It should
however show us that eucharistic communion is only one aspect of communion. We can still see this today when we speak of 'the communion of saints'
and 'the Anglican Communion'.
How did eucharistic communion develop in the church? Jesus and his disciples were Jews. The Old Testament was their Bible. In that, hospitality at
meals was a vital expression of fellowship. Thus Genesis 18 (see Rublev's ikon); contrast Psalm 41:9 and 10. In the Old Testament sacrificial system
the worshipper ate from the sacrifice of the peace offering, as it were with God. This was particularly true of the Passover (Exod. 12; Lev.7:15), but
eating the blood was not allowed (Lev. 17:10-12). In the New Testament Jesus is known for having table fellowship with people (Luke 5:30; unlike John
the Baptist, Luke 7:33, 34 and 15:2).
Whether or not the Last Supper was at Passover, it clearly was a fellowship meal to which Jesus intended to impart new religious significance. The two
earliest recorded accounts mention a (new) covenant in Jesus' blood, which the disciples are to drink (contrast the Old Testament), and use the words
"This (is) my body", "This (is) my blood" (Mark 14:22-25; 1 Cor. 11:23-26) over the bread and the wine. Only I Corinthians mentions the
instruction to do it regularly in memory of Christ. Jesus broke bread with the disciples at Emmaus (Luke 24:30, 35), and Acts 1:4 may refer to Jesus
eating with the disciples. It is clear that, however the eucharist developed in those early days, it was very important for holding local churches
together, and Paul in particular emphasised this (I Cor. 11: 17-22; Gal. 2:11, 12). The rules agreed at the Council of Jerusalem were probably
formulated to maintain eucharistic communion (Acts 15:19,20).
source
1 Corinthians 11:23-26 NIV
23For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you: The Lord Jesus, on the night he was betrayed, took bread, 24and when he had given thanks,
he broke it and said, "This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me." 25In the same way, after supper he took the cup, saying,
"This cup is the new covenant in my blood; do this, whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me." 26For whenever you eat this bread and drink this
cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes.
Passover is from the Old Testament, and YES, Jesus did take part, but he also used it to start something NEW. I do not believe (and please, correct me
if I am wrong) that the NT says the the sharing of the Lord's supper (we call it communion) should only be on Passover, and that we are not called to
take part in communion, and dare I say it, as often as we can.
Anytime we are sharing with eachother, be it through "sacrament" (Bread and wine - not juice, a meal - Lord's supper, love feasts, Jesus meals)
study, discussion, and prayer (spiritual food), etc... if we do it in remembrance of him, it is communion.