|
reply posted on 27-3-2008 @ 12:54 PM by LLoyd45
|
 
Does anyone else think of The Superfriends and the " Justice League of America" when they see
the words League of Democracy?
I can just imagine John McCain in blue leotards and cape surrounded by his Super friends Dick Cheney, George Bush, and Karl Rove..
[edit on 3/27/08 by LLoyd45]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2008 @ 01:03 PM by Maxmars
|
Originally posted by LLoyd45
Does anyone else think of The Superfriends and the " Justice League of America" when they see
the words League of Democracy?
I can just imagine John McCain in blue leotards and cape surrounded by his Super friends Dick Cheney, George Bush, and Karl Rove..
[edit on 3/27/08 by LLoyd45]
 That's too rich! My imagination is hard at work creating a script for a pilot as we speak! The best part will be hashing out the villains!
They would all be poor, uneducated, taxpayers - who must be kept in line! Zig Heil!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2008 @ 01:09 PM by LLoyd45
|
I don't know why, but that was the image that popped in myhead when I saw the title. It'd make a great politcal satire.
Maybe we could all work on a story line, cast of characters, and script, then sell it to Comdey Network!
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 27-3-2008 @ 01:44 PM by centurion1211
|
Originally posted by TheColdDragon
Democracy isn't the greatest thing since sliced bread, not to mention that the States were based upon a Democratic Republic, which is a very specific
beast different from a run-of-the-mill democracy. Even so, it probably isn't the final say in political movements. That would indicate that history
was ending somewhere.
You have a better form (from the ones currently operating in the world) of government in mind than democracy (et al)?
If so, I'd love to hear what it is.
If not, and/or you're wishing/hoping for some utopian form of government to come along a "save us all", I will simply say, "Meanwhile, back in the
real world".
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2008 @ 01:48 PM by Maxmars
|
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by TheColdDragon
Democracy isn't the greatest thing since sliced bread, not to mention that the States were based upon a Democratic Republic, which is a very specific
beast different from a run-of-the-mill democracy. Even so, it probably isn't the final say in political movements. That would indicate that history
was ending somewhere.
You have a better form (from the ones currently operating in the world) of government in mind than democracy (et al)?
If so, I'd love to hear what it is.
If not, and/or you're wishing/hoping for some utopian form of government to come along a "save us all", I will simply say, "Meanwhile, back in the
real world".
How about an anarcho-syndicate commune? Sorry, couldn't resist.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2008 @ 02:14 PM by 44soulslayer
|
What a ridiculous proposition!
How would the bar to this league possibly be enforced?! This is farcical.
The only country to be excluded under non-democratic rules would be China. Even Russia is supposedly a democracy.
Problems with this:
1. China will be excluded. You cant do jack in world affairs without involving China.
2. Corrupt democracies cant be excluded just because we think they are corrupt, that would engender more bad feelings around the world.
McCain ought to stand on a platform of reformation of the UN if anything, not some silly idea involving democracy as a basis of friendship.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2008 @ 02:50 PM by whaaa
|

I can't believe that you can't see thru this transparent appeal to Americans to accept the North American Union by calling it a League of
Democracies; with a few other token countries thrown in like Jamaica and Puerto Rico and Australia.
The NAU is very unpopular. Change the name and hype it on the MSN and you got the same old deal to undermine the traditions and culture of a once
proud US of A.
It's a brave new world, welcome to the monkey house.
Habla Espanol? Better learn!!!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2008 @ 02:53 PM by Maxmars
|
Originally posted by whaaa
I can't believe that you can't see thru this transparent appeal to Americans to accept the North American Union by calling it a League of
Democracies; with a few other token countries thrown in like Jamaica and Puerto Rico and Australia.
The NAU is very unpopular. Change the name and hype it on the MSN and you got the same old deal to undermine the traditions and culture of a once
proud US of A.
It's a brave new world, welcome to the monkey house.
Habla Espanol? Better learn!!!
I am feeling dumb. I should have realized that right off! I wonder why re-marketing the concept under a different name actually threw me off the
track. I gotta stop drinking heavily and doing drugs!
I wonder if they'll rename the Amero to something less 'global' like "sparkles" or "happy money.?"
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2008 @ 03:42 PM by St Udio
|
All McCain is doing is sowing the seeds of-> 'needed change'...
He knows full & well that the many NATO, UN, G-8s, and many more alphabet acronyms are the real avenue to go down...
not some new fangled 'United Democracy Coalition'
He's blowing smoke up the electors noses, & the initial response seems to be giddiness....,.
it's a good ploy, but is nothing more than rhetorical posturing
to make himself 'look good' in a swath of the voting public...
 , with the stammering candidate, trying to seem deeply philosophical
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 06:47 AM by jsobecky
|
reply to post by 44soulslayer
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
What a ridiculous proposition!
How would the bar to this league possibly be enforced?! This is farcical.
 What is the issue you're confused about?
Surely we can come up with rules and guidelines. We are men, are we not? Why do you see this as an impossible task?
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
The only country to be excluded under non-democratic rules would be China. Even Russia is supposedly a democracy.
Negative. It's already been stated that Russia will be excluded. Merely calling oneself a democracy won't be enough for membership. Certain criteria
will have to be met.
China may be initially excluded, but might be enticed to change her ways to gain membership.
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
McCain ought to stand on a platform of reformation of the UN if anything, not some silly idea involving democracy as a basis of friendship.
What's silly is the thought of reforming a corrupt organization like the UN.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 07:07 AM by neformore
|
  
Originally posted by FlyersFan
The UN is too corrupt to be of any value to Americans.
The UN wasn't set up to "be of any value to Americans"
It was set up to be of value to the world, with all countries having equal representation.
Fact is that five permanent members of the UN Security Council have abused their positon over the years to either forward their own agendas or veto
others.
If you're advocating this idea solely because of American interests, then its a pointless waste of time. It needs to built around full equality.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 07:33 AM by LLoyd45
|
Originally posted by neformore
Fact is that five permanent members of the UN Security Council have abused their positon over the years to either forward their own agendas or veto
others.
If you're advocating this idea solely because of American interests, then its a pointless waste of time. It needs to built around full equality.
Don't you believe the League of Democratic Superfriends will do just that? After all their motto is Truth, Justice, and the American
way.
[edit on 3/28/08 by LLoyd45]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 08:09 AM by Apolon
|
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
The only country to be excluded under non-democratic rules would be China. Even Russia is supposedly a democracy.
Negative. It's already been stated that Russia will be excluded. Merely calling oneself a democracy won't be enough for membership. Certain
criteria will have to be met.
I really don't know where to start here with my response.
You stated that merely calling oneself democracy shouldn't be enough!
I totally agree on that. All I hear on the news is white house and anyone in Washington repeating all along about US "the greatest democracy on
Earth".
If you repeat something hundreds of times in a simple brain becomes truth.
Same with a word terrorism. People are freaked out on some bogus terrorist because they were led to believe the hype they repeated dozens of time
every time they were on TV.
Real democratic country will have no need to repeat over and over again such a hollow statement if it was truly democratic.
Obviously they think it is better to use hypnotic repetitive words then to let People vote for instance.
Majority of us here shares believe that US is one of the most corrupt government in the world so are we to assume that they will be member No 1 by
default because of the money, power and influence or can we mere mortals vote them out if we find them unfit?
Next thing is to find someone of integrity to be on the panel, voted and put there in the place by the public not corrupt politicians.
From top of my head there are few People I would love to see there:
Prof. Steven Hawking, (if C. Clarke hasn't past away I would have liked to see him on board), Dalai Lama, Desmond Tutu, etc..
But, something disturbing in my chest is telling me that we will not see true democratic vote and People like that EVER deciding our future but
megalomaniacs and proven criminal record against humanity and the world.
[edit on 28-3-2008 by Apolon]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 09:57 AM by jsobecky
|
reply to post by Apolon
You could have saved yourself a lot of typing by simply stating what's on your mind:
You hate America.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 10:19 AM by Apolon
|

Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by Apolon
You could have saved yourself a lot of typing by simply stating what's on your mind:
You hate America.
I really hope this smiley is there for a cheeky response. Read my post above and many others and tell me if you see difference between hating current
government and People from USA in general.
I am constantly talking about zionist agendas and Kennedy assassination is one of them and somehow People call me anti-semit!!
Jews are not real Semites anyway. I wish People start commenting on the posts rather then using old proven tactics, if you can't beet them, lie and
discredit the Person who doesn't think like you.
[edit on 28-3-2008 by Apolon]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 10:52 AM by JanusFIN
|
This proposal reminds from GW Bush words: "You are with us, or with terrorists"
So, after years has gone, McCain wants to make that conclusion. "If you had work against US interests in recent years, you are out, but those who has
done and said nothing against these lethal acts of US, you are in!"
This is like the last step of fascism, the real "axis of evil" for me. Imperialism is a disease, what has overtake US. In the light of history, this
disease should be past, long time ago.
In my eyes USA have greatest corruption in the world, because its effects are most lethal to rest of us, and also them self.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 10:59 AM by Tenebrous
|
Seems to me that McCain wants a UN organization that legitimizes whatever the US does. That seems to be a big reason that the US does not like the
UN. This seems like an invite only club, and that anything the US puts through, will be unanimously agreed with. Seems very petty to me. Its
because of the US and others that don't want to lose sovereignty that UN does not have any teeth in the first place. Besides the US was a factor in
the creation of the UN. Now that the UN has proved to not be a puppet of the US, its going to leave the UN and create a better puppet? This is
depressing.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 11:05 AM by MikeboydUS
|
reply to post by Maxmars
If we have a TAU or TransAtlantic Union, the currency would be the Eurodollar.
Alot better sounding than Amero or Sparkles.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-3-2008 @ 11:12 AM by MikeboydUS
|
reply to post by Apolon
If Jews are not Semites why are they almost genetically identical to Arabs? Not recent converts but Israeli Jews, Sephardim and Ashkenazim.
Second, why even make a silly statement like "Jews arn't really Semites"?
What does it have to do with John McCain and his ideas?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |