reply to post by TheRepublic
I'll agree with you that the Amero is not as simple as the basic economics described, but at the same time you have to remember that people on the
whole have ADD. We focus on a problem for a bit, then go find the tabloid with the newest celebrity scandal, or complain about gas. So in order to
get things done that may be in the best interest of everyone, certain shocks have to be engineered or ran headlong into.
My economic Geography teacher saw the bubble burst coming 3
years before all of this, and you can't tell me that none of thsoe at the top didn't see it coming . The evidence was all there, and how many
economists were caught with their pants down supposedly?
If historical conspiracy theoriests are right, then FDR refused to pass along a telegram warning of the Pearl Harbor attack a few hours before it
happened in order to get the US into WWII. On Dec. 6,1941, many Americans were against going to war, and were resistant to the Lend-Lease Act. On
Dec. 8, 1941, every thing was different. The warning signs had been there days before, and it was only by luck that the carriers were out to see that
day.
True, the anti-globalist in me hates the idea of the Amero, and the patriot wants the US to stand alone, but the scholar in me (I'm an economic
development minor) dissents saying its not that bad of an idea. So I try to argue both sides of the issue to help those on either side understand one
another, try being the operative word.