Originally posted by seasalt
Originally posted by sir_chancealot
Ok, I'll buy that ***IF*** you can give me a plausible explanation for this one.
Andrews Air Force Base is 16 miles BY CAR from the Pentagon. It is tasked with defending Washington DC in the event of attack. That is an
How did a guy in a cave in Afghanistan get Andrews Air Force Base to stand down, and not launch fighter jets after the second tower was struck?
Andrews Air Force Base is 16 miles away.
You are correct.
What does that have to do with 9/11 and my theory?
I assume you are refering to Osama, when you ask me how a guy in a cave gets Andrews Air Force Base to stand down, and not launch fighter jets after
the second tower was struck?
He was in Afghanistan.
The 19 hijackers assigned to that task did the job.
Osama was a key mastermind.
he meant why didn't the worlds so called greatest air force and rapid response system react or better said, why was it sabotaged imho.
(9/11 norad is swamped with civilian plane hijacking training excercizes when 4 planes just happen to be hijacked for real, norad fails horribly.
(even shooting down the hijacked planes after the frst wtc hit would have been the correct option, it was a situation that called for the lesser of 2
evil's approach, 200 people on aplane dead is less bad then 200 people on the plane plus a 3000 on the ground dead.
7/7 Britisch security and rescue teams are staging bomb scenario's for training in the subway of london real bombs just happen to go off, again the
training becomes reallife confusion severely hampers unit response and efficiency.)
The theory that holds the most merit without agreeing with the official story and has pretext in united states history:
-laden & co pan wtc month and months before september.
-they find that notebook containing airplane suicide attack plans in asia, not sure maybe fillipines? would have to look it up.
-next to all the stuff about it made public the details of the plans were not.
-osama changed his timetable likely after the laptop find.
-At least 2 weeks prior to 9/11, intelligence learns the date and time of the planned attack.
-Mouths are kept shut, certain people are warned not to work in the wtc that day.
-security inside the wtc is diminished (bomb sniffing dogs removed amongst other things)
-the wtc is willingly sacrificed to a terror attack that was known about long in advance, not tomention all the talks high on up about needing a new
pearl harbor (the pretext, australia warned the us about spotting the japanese fleet steamng to hawaii a week! prior to pearl harbor, (not to mention
they forced japan to react with their suffocating embargo on them despite saying "we're neutral".)
The point is, the world is a stage and before you know it you are suckered into following the wrong guy sort to speak.
take the pearl harbor example, america wanted to get in on the war (profit) but the people didn't.
They needed something big and something that would make america look like the victim and japan like the aggressor to get the people steamed up.
They started trade embargo's against japan despite maintaining neutrality (illegal, as it's a contradiction) eventually forcing japan to react.
Japan chose the only possible tactic with the surprise attack, can't blame them when you are up aganst such a military behemoth as the usa you need
something extra, surprise e.g.
They received several warnings of intelligence, when the fleet left japan (target unknown), when australia saw the fleet a week before ph steaming on
a direct course to hawaii (safe to say target definately known now)
A japanese sub was spotted on that morning a while before they were attacked. And yet despite all this warning, america was caught "completely by
surprise" *makes innocent face*
this is not an attack on america anyway, just saying above is politics, economics and powerstruggling without "pink glass" media (not sure if it
applies in english, there'sa saying in dutch about looking at the world through pink glasses)
But what I do want to say is that these kinds of manipulation of the people, history and other countries are tactics that have been used by people in
power since the days of the pharao's, rome, even in the moronic downtrotten middle ages. As we progress they don't change, the tactics just get more
advanced. Morals is a semi fictitious word when politicians, emperors and bankers & businessmagnats are involved.
it's the same everywhere so this is not a hatemail towards the usa (not that I would mistake a country for the persons that just happen to be in
Take the E.U.france and holland voted no for a EU consitution.
Now they have changed the language a bit, called it a treaty and now they don't have to give us a referendum in their second attempt to get it
so we are getting it anyway on jan 1st, 2009 unless the irish vote no as they are the only ones where they couldn't get passed their still very
How often do you think this "treaty" has been featured on tv? It changes so much for everone in a eu member state.
it goes so far as to influence sovereignty and our respective consitutions.
I haven't seen it at all on tv here, just the crap about wilder's movie Fitna (crap movie just saw it yesterday)
So ony the well informed are even aware of the undemocratic power changes in the EU.
My point is don't believe any story just as is. neither the conspiracy theories nor the official story.
Another good idea is to simply look at who had what to gain.
To me its al just funny or sad depends on mymood, the whole world not just america, like I said this stuff happens everywhere.
take america's stance on spreading democracy, they will spread it to everyone regardless if you want it or not (that's not very democratic is it?
lol)to me stufflike that is just funny, humans are naturally insane
anyway it ultimately comes down to 120 global leaders, banking leaders, media conglomorates and big business tycoons having a public but secret
meeting annually to prvately chit chat about what they want to do with europe and america with bankers at top of the foodchain