It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Google Earth Keeping Planet X a Secret!

page: 9
36
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 10:09 PM
link   
The problem here is that originally the calculated the masses of the planets wrong. They went back and recalculated the masses which made the disturbance in orbit disappear. The question to be asked is why our solar syatem has only one star when most have 2 or 3. It is very unusual for a star to not be paired. Does nibiru exist? Not likely! Is their a dwarf unseen star in our solar system not detected I do not know! The corrections to the masses to both planets did however rectify the problem with their orbits!
Is this conspiracy no!!! I wish I had the link to the article I had read!! It explained this entirely mathematically!! It was I believe a 0.05 error in mass that caused this hypothesis to begin!!!




posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 10:46 PM
link   
My question, and this is the fourth time I've asked, still unanswered...

WHY does a 'fleet' that orbits Saturn 'defend' Earth????

Any one or any thnkg that wants to come and attack our planet will not have to 'fly by' Saturn just to get to us!!!!

People....let me make this clear!!! Space is not two-dimensional!

When we look at the constellation Orion, or any othr constellaton, for that matter, we are looking at a combination of stars that FROM OUR VANTAGE POINT happen to resemble a pattern....these various stars are NOT in that pattern, if viewed from another angle!

These stars inhabit our Galaxy, and exist in three dimensions....they will NOT appear the same when viewed form a sufficiently distant point, and I mean some point LIGHT YEARS distant!!! IT is called 'parallax'...it is well understood by most educated people.

This is what saddens me, the apparent lack of understanding of bsic science....

Sidebar: I am told that a recent poll of British school children, as part of one of their 'standarised' tests, found that most of them either didn't know who Winston Churchill was, or thought he was a 'fictional' character.

And I thought the US school system was bad.................



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 11:58 PM
link   
If there is a planet X why isnt there any pictures of it. I mean, you seem to know the location and all. Also, it could be a mapping error or something, as already stated.



posted on Mar, 28 2008 @ 01:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by jasonm56
If there is a planet X why isnt there any pictures of it. I mean, you seem to know the location and all. Also, it could be a mapping error or something, as already stated.


There is but all of them have been explained as other things or phenomena. The whole thing is ludicrous so I created the post below....Yeah I know looks like I am advertising (can I do that?)

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Mar, 28 2008 @ 05:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by IMAdamnALIEN



Your right,

This is quite odd!

Thanks for bringing this to my attention!

Star and flag for you


[edit on 25-3-2008 by IMAdamnALIEN]


It's a perfect square, so it's simply a missing scan of the sky survey data.
There's a lot of information to be found on good reference sites and science news sites that publicly talk about threats like asteroids, we know a huge one might hit us around 2036. This is public knowledge (about a potential hit of a mass extinction sized object)
Nobody kept Tunguska quiet which hit in 1908 if I'm not misstaken.
While not an object that would change the world, if it would have hit a few hours earlier paris could have been wiped from the face of the planet (or a few hours later, new york).

Public knowledge not covered up because people might panic.

GRB's, public knowledge. If a grb hit us even from 1000ly away it would boil off anything living on this planet. Not covered up.

A new exoplanet is found about every week, not covered up.

But because of a missing scan in google earth and some obscure website there MUST be a conspiracy about Nibiru.



posted on Mar, 28 2008 @ 06:58 AM
link   
reply to post by weedwhacker
 


This isnt a post about battle fleets..........also that is not the definition of parallax.Parallax is when you view something that is closer to you it appears to mover side to side,when you view something further it appears to stand still.



posted on Mar, 28 2008 @ 08:46 AM
link   
Can anyone prove if or how Sitchin 'mistranslated' the sumerian tablets? Thanks


[edit on 28-3-2008 by xnibirux]



posted on Mar, 28 2008 @ 08:53 AM
link   
reply to post by xnibirux
 


Can anyone prove he correctly translated them?



posted on Mar, 28 2008 @ 08:58 AM
link   
reply to post by VIKINGANT
 


No, so no one can say they were translated incorrectly.



posted on Mar, 28 2008 @ 10:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by xnibirux
Can anyone prove if or how Sitchin 'mistranslated' the sumerian tablets? Thanks


[edit on 28-3-2008 by xnibirux]


Given the circumstances of what is being challenged as of late, I implore you to visit these two websites:

www.michaelsheiser.com... - As it stands at the moment from my vantage point, this inividual has continued to challenge and critiques of Zechariah Sitchin's errors in his work.

To no surprise, that challenge remains on going and Mr.Sitchin has never responded, albeit it, his advisors or secretaries chimed in on his behalf.

www.sitchiniswrong.com... - Mr. Heiser's tongue n' cheek humor is strewn across his works to maintain a highten level of amusement whilst shattering the paradigms of those read and ponder his material.

Take Care.

[edit on 28-3-2008 by Nephilim2012]



posted on Mar, 28 2008 @ 10:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by OzWeatherman

Originally posted by jasonm56
If there is a planet X why isnt there any pictures of it. I mean, you seem to know the location and all. Also, it could be a mapping error or something, as already stated.


There is but all of them have been explained as other things or phenomena. The whole thing is ludicrous so I created the post below....Yeah I know looks like I am advertising (can I do that?)

www.abovetopsecret.com...


All that you gave me were theories as to why it is real. I have yet to see a photo of it. If the location is known, im sure there will be photos out there. As for the time right now, im not seeing it.



posted on Mar, 28 2008 @ 02:09 PM
link   
reply to post by Byrd
 


OK now SHEEPLE, lets be all be cool...IF and WHEN anything as big, and distinctive as a huge (rogue) brown star shows itself out in space, and is seen by the naked eye, we will have our answer. One way or the other, there isn't a damn thing we can do about any of it. Wait to worry!

If this planasterostar is real, and coming, and does to the Earth what the ancients claim, we'll all be FUBAR in short order...arguing about it NOW isn't going to solve anything.

In the coming short years, TRUTH is going to be a rare commodity. The only truths you will be able to believe, are the ones that slap you on the side of your sheeple heads. That is it! Never expect our or any other government agency to tell you the facts openly, or timely. It ain't going to happen. Period!

Keep digging...



posted on Mar, 28 2008 @ 03:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by xnibirux
reply to post by VIKINGANT
 


No, so no one can say they were translated incorrectly.

Well, yeah...but if that's your only evidence, then your argument is pretty weak.

If Nibiru is so close that it will be visible to the naked eye next year, then some amateur astronomer would have seen it by now -- and the "only visible from the South Pole" argument doesn't work, because NO PART OF THE SKY is only visible from the South Pole. If part of the sky is visible from the South Pole, then it is also visible from other parts of the Southern Hemispere, and can be seen by amateur astronomers living there.


...using your argument, if tomorrow I tell you that I also translated the ancient texts, and they said that there is NO 'rogue plane' coming anyhere near the Earth, would you believe me? Can you prove that I translated it incorrectly?

My point is anyone can say anything. However, without scientific evidence, then what they say is only a bunch of words. Show me the scientific evidence rather than only the word of some guy who made his living selling books on the subject...then maybe I'll begin to believe.



posted on Mar, 28 2008 @ 03:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by xnibirux
Can anyone prove if or how Sitchin 'mistranslated' the sumerian tablets? Thanks




Sitchin's translations are totally different to those of everyone else. And in this case, everyone else includes all of those who have spend decades studying the Sumerian language and text.

You might also like to look at this: www.sitchiniswrong.com...

Of course, Sitchin might be right and everyone else might be wrong. Or, I might be right - in which case Nibiru will just bounce off the earth. Can you prove my idea that Nibiru is 1400ft across and made of rubber is wrong? Otherwise it has to be considered as at least as valid a theory



posted on Mar, 29 2008 @ 01:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by Mark Roazhar
Im slightly confused by all this Planet X 'stuff'.
Orions Belt (and surrounding stars) is visible from the Northern Hemisphere, BUT, Planet X, which is flying in to meet us, will only be viewable (for 3 years from 2009) from the Southern Hemisphere

How is this possible?


Spot on! So called Niburu is supposed to be visible only from the Southern hemisphere by the end of 2008 as its approach is from the South. Probably this is the reason the SPT has been established there!

I don't subscribe to the theory that so called Niburu or one of its planets (Planet X) is going to skim Earth causing an ELE! But then again, can we be absolutely sure this isn't going to happen? More on why it is a possible scenario is in this thread here...

Cheers!



posted on Mar, 29 2008 @ 11:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by Dr.Greenthumb

NASA seems to be silent about Planet X. They certainly are not warning anyone to prepare for its passage. If you did not know any better you would conclude from this alone that Planet X is a hoax. However, the fact is that NASA was the first to announce the discovery of Planet X, back in 1980s as reported in the June 19, 1982 edition of the New York Times:

Something out there beyond the furthest reaches of the known solar system is tugging at Uranus and Neptune. A gravitational force keeps perturbing the two giant planets, causing irregularities in their orbits. The force suggests a presence far away and unseen, a large object, the long-sought Planet X. Astronomers are so certain of this planet's existence that they have already named it "Planet X - the 10th Planet."

Apparently the announcement of the discovery was a slip because within a week they retracted it and have been publicly silent ever since. Yet, there is sufficient evidence that they have had an internal project tracking Planet X as this NASA internal document records:


That same year, Myles Standish used data from Voyager 2's 1989 flyby of Neptune, which had revised the planet's total mass downward by 0.5 percent, to recalculate its gravitational effect on Uranus. When the newly determined mass was used in the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Developmental Ephemeris (JPL DE), the supposed discrepancies in its orbit vanished.

Debunked.

It doesn't exist. Get over it and move on.

[edit on 29-3-2008 by Teki187]



posted on Mar, 29 2008 @ 12:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by xnibirux
Can anyone prove if or how Sitchin 'mistranslated' the sumerian tablets? Thanks


[edit on 28-3-2008 by xnibirux]


Check my thread, myself and another user have posted i there

www.abovetopsecret.com...

There is a link on the first page from an ancient language scholar too. Sitchin is not an ancient language scholar by the way



posted on Mar, 29 2008 @ 12:36 PM
link   
reply to post by jkrog08
 


jkrog, you're right about the battle fleets, sorry folks I posted on wrong thread, had the late-night stupids affecting me!!

Best, WW

[text]

[edit on 29-3-2008 by weedwhacker]



posted on Mar, 29 2008 @ 12:43 PM
link   
I don't know much about Nibiru or whatever, so i'm not exactly an educated opinion on the matter. However, i do know a bit about software applications. I know that Microsoft likes to release their products with security holes and other issues that are corrected over time with service packs, things the like that users point out.

I would imagine this black space in Google Sky is a missing piece that will be resolved in the next version. Just a missing thing, that's all.



posted on Mar, 29 2008 @ 07:40 PM
link   
While I don't put a huge amount of credence in Zacharia Sitchen's interpretations of ancient scripts; he might understand the literal interpretations fine but he then takes a huge leap when it comes to interpretations, recent observations suggest that it's not impossible.

Statistic evidence on objects in the Oort cloud suggest that there is at least once Earth sized planet out there and maybe as man as a dozen. The distances involved make a proper survey very difficult because any planets will be moving very slowly relative to the background stars.

There is the possibility of a Niburu planet and a Niburu like orbit; but if it existed, at that distance even it's atmosphere would be frozen out.

There is even the possibility that the sun may be part of a binary star system with a dark failed brown dwarf companion.







 
36
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join