The problem here is that originally the calculated the masses of the planets wrong. They went back and recalculated the masses which made the disturbance in orbit disappear. The question to be asked is why our solar syatem has only one star when most have 2 or 3. It is very unusual for a star to not be paired. Does nibiru exist? Not likely! Is their a dwarf unseen star in our solar system not detected I do not know! The corrections to the masses to both planets did however rectify the problem with their orbits!
Is this conspiracy no!!! I wish I had the link to the article I had read!! It explained this entirely mathematically!! It was I believe a 0.05 error in mass that caused this hypothesis to begin!!!

My question, and this is the fourth time I've asked, still unanswered...

WHY does a 'fleet' that orbits Saturn 'defend' Earth????

Any one or any thnkg that wants to come and attack our planet will not have to 'fly by' Saturn just to get to us!!!!

People....let me make this clear!!! Space is not two-dimensional!

When we look at the constellation Orion, or any othr constellaton, for that matter, we are looking at a combination of stars that FROM OUR VANTAGE POINT happen to resemble a pattern....these various stars are NOT in that pattern, if viewed from another angle!

These stars inhabit our Galaxy, and exist in three dimensions....they will NOT appear the same when viewed form a sufficiently distant point, and I mean some point LIGHT YEARS distant!!! IT is called 'parallax'...it is well understood by most educated people.

This is what saddens me, the apparent lack of understanding of bsic science....

Sidebar: I am told that a recent poll of British school children, as part of one of their 'standarised' tests, found that most of them either didn't know who Winston Churchill was, or thought he was a 'fictional' character.

And I thought the US school system was bad.................

If there is a planet X why isnt there any pictures of it. I mean, you seem to know the location and all. Also, it could be a mapping error or something, as already stated.

Can anyone prove if or how Sitchin 'mistranslated' the sumerian tablets? Thanks

[edit on 28-3-2008 by xnibirux]

Originally posted by Dr.Greenthumb

NASA seems to be silent about Planet X. They certainly are not warning anyone to prepare for its passage. If you did not know any better you would conclude from this alone that Planet X is a hoax. However, the fact is that NASA was the first to announce the discovery of Planet X, back in 1980s as reported in the June 19, 1982 edition of the New York Times:

Something out there beyond the furthest reaches of the known solar system is tugging at Uranus and Neptune. A gravitational force keeps perturbing the two giant planets, causing irregularities in their orbits. The force suggests a presence far away and unseen, a large object, the long-sought Planet X. Astronomers are so certain of this planet's existence that they have already named it "Planet X - the 10th Planet."

Apparently the announcement of the discovery was a slip because within a week they retracted it and have been publicly silent ever since. Yet, there is sufficient evidence that they have had an internal project tracking Planet X as this NASA internal document records:

That same year, Myles Standish used data from Voyager 2's 1989 flyby of Neptune, which had revised the planet's total mass downward by 0.5 percent, to recalculate its gravitational effect on Uranus. When the newly determined mass was used in the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Developmental Ephemeris (JPL DE), the supposed discrepancies in its orbit vanished.

Debunked.

It doesn't exist. Get over it and move on.

[edit on 29-3-2008 by Teki187]

I don't know much about Nibiru or whatever, so i'm not exactly an educated opinion on the matter. However, i do know a bit about software applications. I know that Microsoft likes to release their products with security holes and other issues that are corrected over time with service packs, things the like that users point out.

I would imagine this black space in Google Sky is a missing piece that will be resolved in the next version. Just a missing thing, that's all.

While I don't put a huge amount of credence in Zacharia Sitchen's interpretations of ancient scripts; he might understand the literal interpretations fine but he then takes a huge leap when it comes to interpretations, recent observations suggest that it's not impossible.

Statistic evidence on objects in the Oort cloud suggest that there is at least once Earth sized planet out there and maybe as man as a dozen. The distances involved make a proper survey very difficult because any planets will be moving very slowly relative to the background stars.

There is the possibility of a Niburu planet and a Niburu like orbit; but if it existed, at that distance even it's atmosphere would be frozen out.

There is even the possibility that the sun may be part of a binary star system with a dark failed brown dwarf companion.