It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Google Earth Keeping Planet X a Secret!

page: 8
36
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 04:23 PM
link   
These are not real time images. My understanding of this software is that it takes a snap shot and pieces the pictures together to give you an idea as to what's out there. These pieces of pictures could be taken several weeks, months or years apart.

Question: did these 'blackouts' just appear all of a sudden or have they been there since the technology was made available to the public?




posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 04:32 PM
link   
of a cover up.

This is supposition and crazy belief dressed up as fact. Planet X doesn't exist. There is no Nibiru. And the world will not end in 2012. Prove me wrong.

LW

Rubbish! Even if the person isnt correct he has still found black areas in google sky. To say Planet X doesnt exist is a very bold statement!So I presume you believe that Sumerians/Egyptians/Aztecs were Mass Hallucinating????????

Their is very strong evidence it does exist so you prove me wrong
do your homework come back and tell me its all hogwash.

SOTM



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 07:08 PM
link   
Planet x DOES NOT EXSIST!!!I take college astronomy and have been interested in all this stuff for atleas 10 years,not to mention my major is theroritical astrophysics or anesthiesiology-so I do know a lil bit about what I am talking.If there was a brown dwarf star anywhere NEAR our galaxy the whole orbit of everything in the solar system would be whacked out.Earth would prolly not be able to sustain life as its orbit would be extrmely changed.We do have brown dwarf per say though:Jupiter is a failed star and could be regarded as a brown dwarf.Now as far as 2012-I do think something will happen,just not cause "Nibiru".



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 07:35 PM
link   
Funny I dont have a "blackout"spot on mine,mine is just fine,and oh by the way-no Nibiru,no brown dwarf,NO PLANET X-JUST STARS LOTS AND LOTS OF STARS!!!



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 07:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by jkrog08

If there was a brown dwarf star anywhere NEAR our galaxy the whole orbit of everything in the solar system would be whacked out.



So you're saying that a brown dwarf (a failed star) existing in (or near) our galaxy would result in orbits being whacked out, but our sun (not a failed star) keeps everything in order? How so?



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 07:51 PM
link   
An Australian news site published some information about Planet X so I posted them a few photo's that I had and I also provided them with links to this forum and the "Black Out" picture , they wrote to google and got this response ...

Full story here : www.australia.to...

Has Google Earth intentionally blacked out a portion of the night sky.

Friday March 28, 2008 8:16am EST

BRISBANE, Australia - Google provides a service known as Google Earth. The facilities are used world wide to provide details of real time, real life images of the earth and night sky.

Google's night sky image for the region LAT -6.01931° LONG -91.5903° appears to show either a very empty part of the sky or an incomplete image.

Planet X is said by some inquisitive people to be visible in that portion of the sky and have expressed disappointment that Google has apparently not provided a full service.

Google provides its services at no cost and is under no obligation to show all of the sky.

There may be many reasons why that portion of the sky is not shown.

Interest in Planet X and or Nibiru is widespread and the lack of detail of all of the night sky creates all sorts of conspiracy theories.

We will send an email to Google to find out for www.Australia.to readers why there is a blank portion of the sky. There may be a reasonable explanation that could include the fact that the above image is not genuine.

Discussion on the missing part of the image can be found on the internet as as example of how imaginations try to fill in the gaps of incomplete images.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Australia.to will publish any answer received from Google and any updates that are sent.but Google is under no obligation to respond.

Google Help to news Re: [#257653916] Other/miscellaneous

Thank you for your note on how we can make our database better. We
appreciate your feedback and use your comments to improve both our
database and our Help Center.

We investigate all data errors and pass all imagery requests on to our
data production team.

We're aware that the imagery for some areas may appear blurry, contain
cloud coverage, appear slightly discolored or out of focus. We strive to
provide the clearest data possible so it's likely that better resolution
data is currently unavailable from our data providers. Once it becomes
available, we'll surely update our database.

Although we do update and/or add new data on a monthly basis, we do not
have a list of when currently low resolution areas or data anomalies will
be updated.

A great way to stay informed of updates is through The Sightseer, our
monthly newsletter, which highlights all of our data additions on an
ongoing basis. If you'd like to subscribe, please visit
earth.google.com...

In addition, we're aware that some addresses are not roof-top accurate.
This is the result of how addresses are matched up to an exact position on
the Earth. We rely on a technique called "address interpolation," which is
a fancy way of saying that we take our best guess. More specifically, we
take the total number of addresses in a given block and assume an even
distribution of the addresses along that block. For example, if there are
ten addresses for the 800 block of Main Street, we assume that the fifth
address is located at the halfway point.

Ideally, we'd use a database that could precisely match addresses to their
rooftops, but unfortunately, such a database doesn't exist. We hope to
have a system in place in the near future that will allow users to correct
their location search results.

We do, however, currently have a way to add and edit business listings:
local.google.com...

Regards,
The Google Earth Team



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 07:56 PM
link   
reply to post by xnibirux
 


What I meant to say was solar system,not galaxy.And as to why it would disrupt the orbits-thats common sense,if "Nibiru"exsisted our entire solar systems planitary orbit would be completly different,it would be lke adding another star into our solaar system,no matter if its outside the Ortt cloud or not,it is a massive body in space.I am anticipating your next response:"Well you said Jupiter was a Brown dwarf!"-NO,I said it was nearly one,a real Brown dwarf would be about 5 times larger than Jupiter.Not to mention that Nibiru is said to have a "mini-solar system"orbiting it.Well if it did the planets would not be capable of supporting life because a Brown dwarf gives of no form of heat,only infra-red and UV radiation.Brown dwarfs

[edit on 3/27/2008 by jkrog08]

[edit on 3/27/2008 by jkrog08]

[edit on 3/27/2008 by jkrog08]



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 08:03 PM
link   
reply to post by jkrog08
 

to be completely accurate jkrog08, there STILL could be a large body out there in the Kuiper Belt that some astronomer will call "Planet X" -- such as the Pluto-sized object found in 2005, now called Eris, which has been classified along with Pluto, Sedna, and the asteroid Ceres as "Dwarf Planets.

...HOWEVER just because there may be another large bobject out there in the Kuiper Belt DOES NOT mean that the large object is the legendary "Nibiru".

The term "Planet X" is a general term that usually means "previously unknown Planet". Asrtronomer Alexis Bouvard in 1821 calculated the orbit of an unkown planet that some called "Planet X" -- this would be latered discovered to be Neptune. Before Pluto was discovered. people said that a "Planet X" would be found beyond Neptune. As I said above, even as recently as 2005, Astronomer Mike Brown temporarily named the object he found (later to be officially named Eris) first "Planet X", the "Planet Xena".

So saying "Planet X" is just a general term for an unseen planet that is speculated to exist...but it is NOT the same as saying "Nibiru".



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 08:05 PM
link   
That is strange, but even more strange is that I got Google Sky when it first came out last year, and at the time Orion’s belt was there, clear and visible, now all of a sudden it’s blacked out?

Mikey



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 08:06 PM
link   
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
 


You are correct,actually another planetoid outside of Plutos orbit was found to be BIGGER than Pluto,which was really the main factor in Pluto becoming a rouge moon-rather than the 9th planet.There are many"planet x's"out there but none of them are Nibiru.



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 08:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Mikey84
 


Its not blacked out!My Google Earth is just fine and shows everything!



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 08:13 PM
link   
Thats hilarious....to say it DOES exist is a bold statement. You obviously haven't done any research into Zacariah Sitchin who apparently started this whole idea when he translated sumerian incorrectly. Read any proffesional scholar trained in ancient semitic languages and you will find that all of them confirm sitchin is wrong

You're the one that needs to do homework

[edit on 27/3/2008 by OzWeatherman]



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 08:19 PM
link   
reply to post by LoneWeasel
 


You need to chill out loneweasel I think your taking this way too seriously... take a break or somthing lol



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 08:20 PM
link   
reply to post by OzWeatherman
 





Their is very strong evidence it does exist so you prove me wrong

This is to stateofmind-What "very strong evidence"do you have?Youtube video,a blacked out Google sky,mistransslated ancient text(and even if it wsnt mistranslated it was prolly a myth anyways.)No on the contrairy-there is OVERWHELMING evidence that it does not exsist.I am a firm believer in alot of conspiracies-but not this one,it has nothing at all to back it up and is shot down w/ pure scientific knowledge.



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 08:21 PM
link   
My take on is its just a mistake.. google never said that the star charts would be perfect... its not like we need them to be correct like our earth maps... at least not until we get interstellar travel.. for the masses anyways



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 08:24 PM
link   
reply to post by jkrog08
 


I just edited my above post....I am on your side

I tried a quote and accidently deleted the other users post and left yours. It was supposed to be the other way around....oops

Sorry bout the confusion

Just to add...there is no strong eveidence Nibiru exists. There is more pointing to why it cant exist rather than why it can

[edit on 27/3/2008 by OzWeatherman]



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 08:27 PM
link   
reply to post by OzWeatherman
 


I am just sick of this Nibiru stuff,I mean there i s more evidence of a "hellenic andromeadian battle fleet"than this,lol.Anyone who knows anything about astronomy will immediatly know this is a load of C-R-A-P.



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 09:23 PM
link   
This thread was originally about Google Earth omitting Planet X from the sky, but as my 'very good friend' xnibirux has pointed out this is a total farce and quite possibly just another opportunity to flog the Nibiru story.

But since this has now become a is it or isnt it real thread ( surprise surprise!) I would like to reaffirm my position. Perched firmly upon the fence.

I am pretty have the same point of view as Soylent. It is quite possible there is another planetoid object in the far reaches maybe even as big a a dwarf star. Who knows? but if it has always been there it wont affect our orbits too much unless it is a recent addition. As an example, If you take Jupiter out things will go haywire add another Jupiter in and things will go haywire but since things are as they are and always have been all is well with the universe so to speak.

I am also in agreeance with Ozweatherman, in that when you start suggesting a collision with earth or some superbeing (Annunaki?) residing on the planet then credibility os lost.



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 09:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mikey84
That is strange, but even more strange is that I got Google Sky when it first came out last year, and at the time Orion’s belt was there, clear and visible, now all of a sudden it’s blacked out?

Mikey

Orion's belt is NOT blacked out in Google Sky, nor did the OP ever say it was -- the blacked out part is a very tiny patch of sky near Orion that is hard to see unless you know where to look.

...but as the OP himself graciously admitted, believers in Nibiru (and I am NOT one of those believers) say it is supposedly coming from the south and is only visible from the South Pole. Since Orion is nowhere near the sky's "South Pole", and is best viewed from middle latitudes, then this blacked-out patch could not be due to some conspiracy to hide Nibiru.



EDIT: spelling

[edit on 3/28/2008 by Soylent Green Is People]



posted on Mar, 27 2008 @ 09:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
 


Darn it! SGIP keeps stealing my thunder with his ridiculously salient posts!!!!

Thank you, SGIP, for keeping it real!!!

Tim/WW




top topics



 
36
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join