This topic is in the ATS Skunk Works discussion forum.  (rss)


Google Earth Keeping Planet X a Secret!


<<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>



reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 06:44 PM by zorgon


Perhaps the "Orion" reference came from the fact that they found Extra Solar planets there...



Ten New Extrasolar Planets Announced

The star HD 38529 is 137 light years away, in the constellation Orion. The planet's period is 14.3 days; its average distance from the star is 0.13 AU. The lower limit on its mass is 0.77 Jupiter masses.


www.spaceref.com...

Listing of Extra Solar Planets

www.matessa.org...

I personally like this one...

Planet Osiris, Pegasus Constellation HD 209458 b
Osiris transiting its sun...
www.thelivingmoon.com...

Oceans in the Air Gigantic oceans of water girdle HD 28185 b
Jupiter size
www.thelivingmoon.com...

So maybe Nibiru is 'out there' somewhere...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 07:31 PM by amicrazy


First image is a screenshot taken from google sky.
Second image is the nasa photo from a post on the first page.
Only difference I can see and probably explainable.




reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 07:34 PM by Rockpuck


reply to post by dk3000



From my understanding most of these photos are taken from airplanes not satellites.. in fact, I don't believe Google actually owns a single satellite.. So these photos cannot be taken every month, year or even few years.

When I look at my city.. i see entire neighborhoods that are not on the map, its still a farm or a forest though the development is over 5-7 years old. Many photos are meshed and combined archive photos individual cities take and keep in records.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 08:33 PM by zorgon



Originally posted by Rockpuck
From my understanding most of these photos are taken from airplanes not satellites..


That would be quite a feat... taking star photos from an airplane...



Yup you got the mystery solved



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 08:43 PM by eastbosbud


i posted this on the end of nibirus first phase forum

Member


Registered: 25-3-2008
Location:

Mood:
Member is on ATS now.


ATS Points: 7
BTS Points: 3
PTS Points: 2







posted on 25-3-2008 @ 12:07 PM single this post "quote"REPLY TO:


If you go to google sky and search the area of orion's belt yoiu wioll find 2 areas of space that have been cut out and filled with black emptiness...
BLANK SPACE
LAT -6.01931°
LONG -91.5903°
Directions: To here - From here

this is the area from where nibiru is to come from


signature



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 08:43 PM by eastbosbud


i posted this on the end of nibirus first phase forum

Member


Registered: 25-3-2008
Location:

Mood:
Member is on ATS now.


ATS Points: 7
BTS Points: 3
PTS Points: 2







posted on 25-3-2008 @ 12:07 PM single this post "quote"REPLY TO:


If you go to google sky and search the area of orion's belt yoiu wioll find 2 areas of space that have been cut out and filled with black emptiness...
BLANK SPACE
LAT -6.01931°
LONG -91.5903°
Directions: To here - From here

this is the area from where nibiru is to come from


signature



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 09:04 PM by weedwhacker


reply to post by zorgon



zorgon, one who mocks a perfectly plausible possiblity from user rockpuck?

Seriously, why couldn't a telescope be gyroscopically stabilized on an aerial platform? Ummm....isn't that the basis of the HST?

WHAT a brilliant (no pun) concept! Mount a telescope on an airplane, so as to be above most of the pesky atmosphere. Sure, wouldn't be as big a mirror as at Keck or Mauna Kea, but the point is to get out of the atmosphere as much as possible....I don't know of many telescopes on Everest, up there at a mere 19,000 feet (and I'mbeing generous).

SO, your sarcasm seems slightly out of character, even for you, considering some of the claims you make. OH, and DEW destroying the WTC? (off topic, I know, but needed to be mentioned, to make a point...)

[edit] This last was an indirect reference to something else, some time ago...but it sort of relates to other recent threads re: dangers from space...guess if we have this DEW tech, then we shouldn't be worried about aliens, is my point here....my logical hat just won't fall off, I guess.

[edit on 26-3-2008 by weedwhacker]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 09:06 PM by Shadow_Lord


reply to post by dk3000



But those dates do not match every page that makes up an image. Thats the problem.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 09:09 PM by Shadow_Lord


reply to post by zorgon



I think he was replying about the pictures of land, specificly about an amusement park outdated picture with an old rollercoaster in it.

Too many mini threads in this thread



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 09:10 PM by MrPenny



Originally posted by weedwhacker
zorgon, one who mocks a perfectly plausible possiblity from user rockpuck?


Oh it's even better than that weedwhacker. He didn't even to bother backtracking and discovering that Rockpuck was referring to a post about Google Earth images, photos of terrain....therefore making perfect sense.

Typical though....wouldn't want to research too deep.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 09:14 PM by Shadow_Lord


reply to post by Conluceo



I will U2U so I don't hijack.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 09:21 PM by geologist


reply to post by xnibirux



After reviewing the link showing the orbit of Planet X, I had a question. How is it that Planet X will pass between Earth and Mercury when the diagram shows the projected orbit between Mars and Jupiter? The diagram shows it in the asteroid belt, that should make for some interesting interactions. The notes on the diagram also had this occuring in May of 2003 crossed out and replaced with "Time of arrival unknown! Coming soon".

Also, as noted by others, how is it that Planet X is in several places at once? Behind the sun, in the area of Orion, or from the south pole? Or are there several Planet Xs/Nibirus out there?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 09:34 PM by xnibirux



Originally posted by geologist

Also, as noted by others, how is it that Planet X is in several places at once? Behind the sun, in the area of Orion, or from the south pole? Or are there several Planet Xs/Nibirus out there?




Like I said, it isn't in the area of Orion, that is just a section of its orbit, it does not mean that is where its current position stands. Sorry for the confusion.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 09:38 PM by weedwhacker


reply to post by MrPenny



MrPenny!

Ahhh....HaHaHaHa!! thanks for that, I needed it!!

Can I add you to my 'friends' list? It's long overdue....

WW



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 09:52 PM by VIKINGANT



Originally posted by xnibirux

Originally posted by geologist

Also, as noted by others, how is it that Planet X is in several places at once? Behind the sun, in the area of Orion, or from the south pole? Or are there several Planet Xs/Nibirus out there?




Like I said, it isn't in the area of Orion, that is just a section of its orbit, it does not mean that is where its current position stands. Sorry for the confusion.


If this is the case why do they not show that area when 'Nibiru' is not in that position? Why also have they not blacked out the other said positions?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 09:56 PM by mageofzhalfir


reply to post by VIKINGANT



Indeed. This is conclusive evidence that OP's claims are incorrect.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 10:13 PM by zorgon


reply to post by Shadow_Lord




LOL did anyone even look art the google Earth image of the Naval Observatory??

People like Mr Penny and Weed Wacker add nothing to a thread but smart ass comments...

Here is the obvious editing from google maps image of the Naval Observatory... you can zoom in and see what I am talking about... and this is on Earth

image source: http://www.thelivingmoon.com/45jack_files/04images/Naval_Observatory/Naval_001.png


So since the thread is about google editing I see this as a pretty good example... of course some people just prefer to stuff a thread with meaningless babble... fortunately most people at ATS are intelligent enough to see through these children...





[edit on 26-3-2008 by zorgon]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 10:15 PM by mageofzhalfir


reply to post by zorgon



The undeniable fact that Google Earth blurs images on this planet for national security purposes by no means proves that it is done in outer space. The Nibiru/Planet X believers are going to have to do better than that.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 10:21 PM by weedwhacker


reply to post by zorgon



zorgon, clever try, but it has been already noticed...months ago!!! ...THAT the Office of the Veep decided to blur the location of the Naval Observatory...the location that every American knows is the 'official' residence of the Veep...or, if you like, the VPOTUS...better said as 'VeePOTUS'

Funny thing is...I can drive my car....yes, my actual automobile, right by the gates to the NAVAL OBSERVATORY. It ain't a big secret, it's right there on my map....and, it's on the TomTom map, and the Magellan map, etc, etc, etc.....

What is most telling, of course, is that while the Dark Lord Cheney insisted Google blur the NAVAL OBSERVATORY, he didn't bother to insist the same treatment at the WHITE HOUSE. NOR, at the Executive Building, right next door....the same place that had the suspicious fire, several months ago, just near Dick's offices....hmmmmmmm....and, of course, we can never know what was burned, since it is a National Security matter. [coughing....ahem....BS!! ....OK, I feel better....]

I had to corrct a typo...oops, now I have to correct another typo...guess it's the English teacher in me!! (private joke...) No, I spent most of my life flying airplanes, just happened to be a perfectionist along the way, and learned how to spell.

Back to topic, since we ARE talking about 'Planet X'....as I asked before, it has been posited that this 'Niburu' is hiding as it approaches from the south, that is, it is implied it is coming from the South as we understand it, relating to the orbits of the planets, and 'South' being down...how convenient, since the Earth is mostly inhabited in the Northern Hemisphere...I mean, what we consider 'Western' civilization, and hence, technology, reside in the Northern hemisphere.

Of course, that is a subtle slap in the face to all of the intelligent people who actually have technology and civilization and, indeed, live in the SOUTHERN hemisphere!!!

SO....'Niburu' is sneaking up on us. It must be in an erratic, off-plane orbit, since it is coming from the 'south', so to speak....

BUT, it is only a few years away....it's a 3,600-year orbit? Wow! It has to be very close, guess we'd see it by now....oh! It's a brown dwarf, so invisible....except, brown dwarfs put out a lot of heat.....guess that idea fails....

Really, I could go on, but logical people get the point already......



[edit on 26-3-2008 by weedwhacker]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-3-2008 @ 10:38 PM by zorgon



Originally posted by weedwhacker
Seriously, why couldn't a telescope be gyroscopically stabilized on an aerial platform? Ummm....isn't that the basis of the HST


Please be so kind as to show us your evidence on how google takes space images from an airplane... seeing as you seem to believe this to be so...

Besides everyone knows DigitalGlobe is the provider of imagery for Google Inc's interactive mapping program Google Earth, and they use a satellite not an airplane...

But then research is not your strong point is it?

The rest of your post... meaningless drivel totally unrelated to the thread or the topic... as usual...

I hope you and your new 'buddy' will have many hours of enjoyment being ignored




reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:

































ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

,
















ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 1.072 seconds
Page processed in 0.296 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread