Google Earth Keeping Planet X a Secret!, page 3

Someone posted Orion is in another galaxy. Orion's stars are within our galaxy. just wanted to add that quick...

It's weird how people use the defense FOR Nibiru existence as "it exists because you cannot prove it does not exist" Under that logic, no one can prove that I do not have the ability to create unicorns out of midair and use them to teleport to the Moon. When trying to prove something exists, you try to prove it exists, not the other way around.

First this whole Nibiru thing, and it's location in the sky. How can anyone give it's location, when they cannot prove it exists? Before anyone mentions Stichin, please research his translations against others. Don't fall into the trap of using him as a source of information when it is not reliable.

Planet X. When talking about planet X in "NASA" terms, it is a planetary body predicted to be found outside the orbit of Neptune, large/massive enough to disrupt the orbit of Neptune.

Walk through the logic on Nibiru. If it can only be seen from the south pole (or southern hemisphere) then clearly it is location "below" Earth. (Using Earth's orbital plane as a fake horizon, north being "up"). Now Nibiru is supposed to be close to intercepting Earth's orbit. How does an object that is near 93 million miles interrupt Neptune? How can it NOT interrupt our Moon and all the other inner planets? How does it actually stay in an orbit shaped like an oval so extreme and not decay like anything else would? If our Sun captured an object (would have to of been a capture, not formed due to orbit) it cannot have such an extreme orbit. Our Sun would have just altered its path and it would keep going, or be pulled into the Sun. Having an orbit that is that far out, means it does not travel as fast as Earth does in order to keep a sustained orbit if using logic that it is a native part of the solar system. It really comes down to Suns' gravity vs another objects mass/velocity. What is being used as a definition in this case simply cannot work.

Every so many years it makes a comeback that THIS time, it will appear. 1996, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2012. Those are the years it was guaranteed (by various people) to appear. I understand that people might have just heard about it, and don't know about the "last time", or the time before that. (Any one remember Nancy and the Zeta's?) Baffling how it got tied into when the Mayans calender ends and restarts. (If that was the sign of the end..we should see it every December 31 when our calendar ends)

The logic of Nibiru does not make sense. Things that some people use to legitimately prove its existence (Neptune's orbit for example) are flawed because of the defined path Nibiru supposedly follows. The only thing that can be done is seperate Nibiru from that information, which now leaves trying to prove it's existence with no evidence at all. Or keep changing the information to match what is needed at the time.