If our government has been able to keep it's proof of ETs and their crashe and buried ships and technologies from us, then hiding any evidence of past civilzations shouldn't be hard or obvious.
Besides, many who might find such evidence may not realize it was that old either and think it was recently buried. Digging up some stainless steel flatware wouldn't seem like much of a find. Imagine anyone trying to use that as evidence. ........Or is that the running joke?

I had come across an article on The Book of Thoth site on some supposedly related finds such as an iron or steel tea pot buried deeep beneath the surface thousands of years old and now it's gone from the site. I suppose it wasn't proven as authentic?

I have wondered if anyone has found any real geological evidence of cyclical extinctions such as from the astronomical alignments or planet x etc. Where's the proof of massive upheavels?

There's most likely some really extensive and highly secret museum and library somewhere with all of these answers for just the elite groups. That would be an interesting and expensive tour. I wonder if ghosts or remote viewrs aren't allowed either?

What? So we're gonna the dig the Rama Empire weapon's technology or the Atlantians (vimana, Vailixi, molecular bombs, nukes) that destroyed their civilizations or almost the entire earth during that time, so that we can destroyed our's. Think people, Think. Just let it rot in the bottom of the earth okay .

I think it makes sense. If we imagine that all our cities would get wiped out along with 99.9% of people, we would have a handful of people trying to survive. They would have no way to write down their memories of what happened except maybe try to scratch it the walls of caves. Which is where we have found paintings of UFO's, helicopters, people and so on.

Its possible that these paintings were a way to try and pass on to the future that humans lived in a high tech world once before. Its actually quite likely. Its what we would do.



[edit on 16-8-2008 by Copernicus]

I'm amazed how many people are talking about 'archeological proof', but in the same time are ignoring, ridiculing or attacking people who have found some 'anomalies' that drop a lot of mainstream theories in water...

trouble is that modern science has created a lot of dogma based just on theories or half truths...

fine example are the pyramids... no one knows exactly how they were built (even with today's technology it would be a big problem, to build one out of stone) but still, scientist cling to the THEORIES like they are hard truth...

It really puzzles me why would anyone dismiss a possibility of ancient civilizations millions of years old just because time erased any evidence...?

this of course is problem of man's ego, especially scientist's arrogant, all-knowing ego which has become (unfortunately) a virtue these days...

there is a nice Max Planck quote that explains this:

“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it”