This topic is in the ATS Skunk Works discussion forum.  (rss)


sending data through time?




Topic started on 24-3-2008 @ 06:23 PM by jdinaz


The realization of human time travel, if it is possible, seems to be a far distant event in our future. Due to the limitations of human anatomy and most of the current theroies of time travel the human shell would most likley be destroyed while traveling through time. Keeping this in mind, would it be any easier to send data through time? Data has no physical imitations and could be equally damaging or helpful in the right hands as somone with first hand knowledge of what is to come. Your thoughts please



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-3-2008 @ 06:29 PM by R3KR


Yes, would be easier to send data "through" time. Could be paper or a disk -prob wont survive cause magnetics involved in time travel.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-3-2008 @ 06:33 PM by jdinaz


I was not thinkins so much as physical data, I was thinking more along the lines of energy. Think of the way the internet works or a satalite signal. I wonder if it could be sent using our current systems as a reciver? IE seti or current satalites.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-3-2008 @ 12:49 AM by lnaphx


We do send things through time, all the time, already. I guess you could say it's a 1:1 time, aka real time. But, I know you mean, like back in time, or forward in time.

I think, the problem with the future is that there are so many futures. To send a binary message, for example, to the future, it would take energy to pop it into all the futures, for this time jumping to occur, to guarantee that you would receive the message in your future, to prove the time travel exists. This is assuming a straight-line time model to begin with.

Why would the future bother to notice a message from the past? An echo? Why would the future want to read a message from the dead? As for a message to the past, they don't have the technology to interpret the data, and even if they did, they could call it a fake.

Writing a message to my past, so that my past self will read it. Sort of spoils the adventure.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-3-2008 @ 11:12 AM by Mark Roazhar


Its possible to send energy faster than light. BUT, that doesnt mean its going backwards in time. It arrives faster but not before you send it.

There is nothing to actually stop this from happening, as it fits in with the majority of known sciences.

This could be handy for sending messages over huge distances, ie Mars, where you have a large time delay of 6-41 minutes. This is speculation though and how much time you shave off the time is a different matter. The fastest speed needed there would be 41xLight Speed or hopefully faster for further away where the signal would be instantaneous.

As for sending information back in time, I dont think its probably, or ever would be available. The problem is cause and effect. If you sent a message back to yourself, what happens if you dont send the message when youre supposed to?
Do you get a paradox effect, with the universe ripping itself apart, or just a migraine caused by the GOD OF TEMPORAL MECHANICS


[edit on 25-3-2008 by Mark Roazhar]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:






ATS MIX Podcasts:


Recently Added Videos















ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

(no tags)


















ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.013 seconds
Page processed in 0.069 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

thread