These hawks are relentless, aren't they? It's as though if they simply keep repeating that Iran is responsible, the accusation will acquire some
legitimacy and stick.
What doesn't get reported - at least, not by the mainstream media - is that the US is working with organisations they themselves have classified as
'terrosits' in order to destablise Iran. Is it really such a stretch of the imagination to see that these groups could well be responsible for
these attacks, and that they were acting at the behest of the US? It is, after all, a tried and tested method.
Every time I hear of some alleged Iranian or Iranian-sponsored wrongdoing, I'm reminded of the words of Zbigniew Brzezinski, the former National
Security Advisor under President Carter.
If the United States continues to be bogged down in a protracted bloody involvement in Iraq, the final destination on this downhill track is
likely to be a head-on conflict with Iran and with much of the world of Islam at large. A plausible scenario for a military collision with Iran
involves Iraqi failure to meet the benchmarks; followed by accusations of Iranian responsibility for the failure; then by some provocation in Iraq or
a terrorist act in the U.S. blamed on Iran; culminating in a “defensive” U.S. military action against Iran that plunges a lonely America into a
spreading and deepening quagmire eventually ranging across Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. (source:
Senate Foreign Relations Committe testimony)