reply to post by ShaunMK
Is a New World Order Good or Dad? You ask.
Well, i personally like what some people arround the '30 wrote about this "New World Order", also seen as a totalitarism Goverment.
I always liked the ambiguity yet obvious similarity between Huxley's Brave New World and Orwell's 1984 (both are book that with luck you can find
them to read right from the internet.)
Both speak of totalitarian overments that, after killing many many people took power.
A Brave New World speaks of a "happy" world. A world that revolves arround sex, drugs and inmediate pleasure. This world is happy, and the book is
about the only person that is not happy in this world.
On the other side 1984 speaks of a facist/comunist (if it may called like that) world that lives with the fear of a constant war, and constant fear by
a dicatorship goverment. Anyone who thinks diferent is tagged as a "mind criminal" (actually im traslating from spanish so i may no be completely
) and is "pulverised". (that last one... i don't even remember the word in spanish
If you haven't red any i recomend you do, both are marvelous pieces of social study.
Now my opion.
It would be BAD.
Why? well. the key word is Order.
Somewhere right now in someplace of the world is scolding his dog for running arround the house. Why? because he is breaking the house "Order".
Order is subjective. Two persons could have a completely diferent idea of "Order". Hitler was creating a New world order. And for everything to be
in "order" for him many people had to die.
Just notice that "order" always involve the "reordering" of somthing that is "disordered". But what is disordered? are the moles stealing some
carrots disordered? or the bum living under the highway? or that kid with a mental desease?
Even if the "new order" is not planing on killing people? would it reorganize them? would it oblige people to do any kind of activity?
Who gives anyone the right to choose for another?
A new world order, where people loves each other and willingly submit themselves to the people (And not a power figure in the throne like happened
with comunism) would be ideal.
But until the people is ready to unite until a single banner, a single ideology. Or just accept any other that anyone may have... Forcing a new world
order won't make it happen. It will just bring slavement to the human race.
One more thing i like to ad is that uniting the world would not make us prolifer scientifically.
Most of the biggest inventions of the human race come from misfits of society. Mostly because the idea of order eliminates free will. And free will
We allready have free energy technology and some crazy (and thats why i love them) people is already testing and using it. I'm talking about water
run engines, electrolisis devices and more.
For any human advancement the idea of freedom has to live.